733
submitted 2 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 152 points 2 months ago

This, this is what we need. If everyone votes. If we can get a progressive executive in and a progressive Congress where we can, we can potentially correct the course everything is going.

No more control of everything by the wealthy. That is the ultimate goal. We want to separate power from money.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 54 points 2 months ago

Listen to progressives, get progressive enthusiasm.

Democrats have had it backwards for so long, demanding that progressives must demonstrate more decades of unearned fealty before the party will consider listening to them.

Look what happens when they put the horse before the cart for once.

[-] glizzard@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I don’t need to be that guy, but I think we can thank Joe.

That man has been around for decades, championing neoliberal trash easily for the first two thirds. It’s taken someone like him being wrong over and over and over, getting up again, and making better decisions the next day.

Thanks, Joe.

It’s ironic that all these new lovers of geopolitics that hate Joe for his Israel stance over the years also refuse to consider American politics. Joe’s only doing what the American Empire has been working towards for a century. The fact he’s pushed back at all is incredible. This isn’t “gay marriage is a good thing” or “black people should use fountains” — the existence of Israel and western influence in that area is possibly worth trillions of dollars. Joe’s listening, he just knows more than us. Obviously.

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 6 points 2 months ago

And the decision to step aside for his country to boot. Admiration abound for demonstrating true leadership there, and overall.

[-] glizzard@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

What I was referencing really, but his entire fall into mostly progressive policies has been a kind of crazy sight. Like how’d we get to Walz? This feels like a Henry Wallace pick to me. Crazy.

[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Need to ungerrymander states or else you'll have nothing if the house is full of red shit state obstructionists

[-] ashok36@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Just have Harris murder them before they're sworn in and keep double tapping every new one that shows up until the state legislature get the message.

Impeachment is a joke and the scotus said presidents are immune. She can literally do whatever she wants.

/s of course

[-] Branch_Ranch@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Dark brandon still has 5 months to fuck shit up for the regressives. LETS GO!

[-] cacheson@piefed.social 11 points 2 months ago

We want to separate power from money.

Unfortunately, the two have an extremely strong attraction to each other. Keeping them apart isn't feasible in the long run without actively dismantling concentrations of power.

[-] Triasha@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Money is literally power.

It is a coupon that commands a fraction of labor and capital combined.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

If we can get a progressive executive in and a progressive Congress

Hold on there. Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts has other ideas. "...we are in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be.....”

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Ultimately, they are cowards. And when they see the numbers of voters for the progressives, most will abandon that when we also see that a huge amount of progressives are well armed.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If we can get a progressive executive in and a progressive Congress where we can, we can potentially correct the course everything is going.

Strong disagree.

Getting a progressive executive and Congress would be great, but there is no way in hell they're going to correct course before the next midterm election, or the next presidential election, or the ones a decade after that.

Remember that it took Evangelicals fifty years of strident work to get Roe overturned. That is the level of effort that will be required to change course on just one issue.

Stop putting hope in people's minds that we can unfuck ourselves faster than we fucked ourselves. This needs to happen every single election for the rest of my life before I would agree that the course has been corrected, and this sort of attitude makes people give up on voting because things won't change very much in the short term.

[-] Scallionsandeggs@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The difference between Roe and progressive policies is that said policies are broadly popular with the electorate. Making durable, unpopular changes under minority rule is virtually impossible with our federal legislature, and the right had to finally luck out and enact them by installing enough Supreme Court justices willing to upend the system. From a long-term view, Roe wasn't a sustained effort, or at least not a successful one until very recently. The evangelicals had been losing support on the issue every year and exploited a crack in the system that McConnell exposed in 2016.

The GOP and the conservative coalition within the Democratic Party can't afford to allow significant progressive policy through even once because it becomes political suicide to repeal without years of propaganda and budgetary ratfucking. Obamacare is the latest example. It's not even close to the same effort level.

A second New Deal Congress is coming within our lifetimes. The demographics say it's inevitable (as long as we have elections, anyway). Yes, it will take work, and it starts in the primaries.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

A second New Deal Congress is coming within our lifetimes.

That entirely depends on how old you think I am.

I've been hearing this sort of thing for decades already, and I don't see it happening.

I'll keep voting, but I'm done holding my breath. The American People have let me down too many times.

[-] Archer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Luck out? Hardly. It was the careful, planned work of decades of effort from Leonard Leo and the rest of the Federalist society weirdos

[-] UNY0N@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

I agree with you completely that need more than 2-4 years to correct the course. But we could get decades of actual progress if we just fix one glaring issue now.

We need to abolish the electoral college.

That alone would decimate any chances that the republican party has of winning a presidential election anytime soon, at least with thier current platform. It wouldn't be everything, but it would be a damn good start.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

We need to abolish the electoral college

Which will require a Constitutional amendment. Which most of the states won't go for because most of them will lose power.

So we'd need a supermajority in both the House and Senate to do it.

Which will take decades of elections to get to, if it ever happens. And even if it does there will be other, more urgent things to do before then, and then we'll lose the supermajorities and have to start from scratch again.

Telling people we just need a couple good elections is creating false hope.

[-] UNY0N@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

It's not false hope. It's just a long journey ahead.

You obviously understand more about the details of US politics than I do, and perhaps getting rid of the electoral college isn't realistic right now.

I get where you are coming from, this doesn't mean we can just sit back and enjoy. But this kind of turnout is a good thing. Harris is going to win, and that's the first step in the right direction.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I've seen this sort of thing too many times, only for it to fall apart completely because nobody explains to the kids that they need to keep this pressure up. I refuse to get my hopes up again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 115 points 2 months ago

Can't wait to hear the Trump/Vance take on this.

"THEY MAKE PEOPLE WAIT"

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I kind of pity trump’s sharpie. I’m not sure it has enough ink for all those stick figures he’s gonna be drawing.

[-] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago

I doubt he would know how. Suppose his cell mate could teach him, if he asks nicely.

[-] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

His cell mate Bowling Ball Bag Bob, Who like to play a game called "balls on chin"

[-] spamfajitas@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

Way better than when Trump made people wait and they ended up in the hospital

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 months ago

Some GOP Governor will declare the line for one of their rallies loitering and send in the police. Trump will demand the rallies be suppressed.

[-] experbia@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

their current shitty take is that these people allegedly only lined up for the "free concert" and "handouts" (that just must have happened to justify this many people in line, I mean, it's self evident isn't it? /s) and they then allegedly all left before Kamala even got on stage, lmao

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

“We make people wait longer!”

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 47 points 2 months ago

These crowds are incredible. Detroit was just as big. I'd post some Twitter, but you guys will whine no end.

[-] Botzo@lemmy.world 60 points 2 months ago
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago

Now why would truth social be OK with you guys and Twitter is not?

[-] macaro 22 points 2 months ago

Kamala is meeting people where they’re at. Even if it’s a cesspool swamp worse than Twitter.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

WTF are you talking about.

[-] macaro 6 points 2 months ago

The truth social link points to a post by the Harris waltz campaign.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

The argument isn't the presenter but the medium in which it is presented.

[-] macaro 3 points 2 months ago

The medium it’s presented in has a lot of Trump supporters. Showing up and being visible in that space is important.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You're telling me. My IPTV just changed from the Olympics to the Trump news conference all by itself and I don't think I'll ever be the same.

[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

Hell, at least Truth Social is clearly right wing; X is still pretending to be Twitter, wearing the blue bird like a skin suit.

[-] Drunemeton@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

“Put the lotion in the basket Elon…”

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

What would I care. For me confirmation of news happens with common sense story by story. A story can go though several modes of media before it gets to you. In fact, the whiners seem to dislike the owner of Twitter. I could give two shits because I know that a story can start in Twitter and end up on this very sub.

[-] Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

First time I've ever clicked a truth social link

[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 months ago

I found that I can either accept their cookies, or get more information about why I can only accept them, which concluded my brief visit.

[-] Masta_Chief@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Same here. I haven't felt filthy visiting a website in a long time

[-] Botzo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Me too! (I actually found it on mastodon)

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

It honestly gives me chills that Democrats responded to organic democratic efforts. We finally had a real Primaries, and look at that enthusiasm.

I'll say it again and again: Enthusiasm is contagious. Every one of these people are amped up; they will then turn around and talk to their family and friends. They will remind more apathetic people they know who lean left and convince them to register and vote. Because their morale is high, they're going to spend a little more time combating trolls on social media instead of letting them run their mouths unchecked and spreading misinformation unchallenged. They may be able to even reach out to their uncle or parent who leans right and gain a convert here and there... Again, because excitement is contagious.

I've been saying this for years that this is how Democrats win.

[-] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

fingers crossed for you, USizens - and for the rest of the world, I guess...

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Common Dreams - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Common Dreams:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.commondreams.org/news/harris-walz-2668918795
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
733 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19047 readers
3457 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS