120
submitted 3 months ago by filoria@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] filoria@lemmy.ml 72 points 3 months ago

IMF: your housing market is collapsing

China: yeah we know

IMF: so how about you bail out those poor housing investors

China: ...no thanks

IMF: surprised Pikachu

[-] Shard@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Majority of those housing investors being the common people who are buying homes...

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This isn't about people getting a place to live, this is speculation, like Bitcoin, but with housing. There's a mass of people buying housing to commodify it by selling it later at a huge price or by renting it out. This mass of people got scammed by housing developers who promised to deliver the apartment or house (at a good quality). Unfortunately, that didn't happen; developers ran ponzi schemes. They used investors' money to start new constructions and attract new investors, and stopped working on the old constructions or finished them poorly with bad materials.

This is how capitalism works unregulated. So the small investors fucked around trying to become petite bourgeoisie, and they're finding out the beauty of capitalism.

I know this is hard to hear for Americans, but if you're making money from being a landlord or flipping houses, you're a piece of shit.

Bailing out these investors would be like bailing out Bitcoin "common people" investors when the "currency" crashes.

edit: grammar

[-] johnyma22@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

If you buy a derelict house(that no human can possibly live in) and fix it up to a decent standard with the intent to sell it, are you still a piece of shit?

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

You add the repairs to the price.

If you're creating a luxury house/apartment, well, the word "luxury" is already there.

[-] johnyma22@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

I'm really confused.. Did you answer my question?

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I clarified how it depends. The answer was "it depends", which is a very displeasing answer, so I skipped a step.

[-] PanArab@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 months ago

if they bought the houses to live and not speculate, it doesn't matter

[-] realharo@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

But the article is specifically talking about unfinished projects.

So you don't have a flat to live in either, you have an abandoned construction site.

[-] PanArab@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 months ago

Homeownership rate in China is over 95%

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_home_ownership_rate

What kind of world are we living in where people who have no idea what they are talking about argue with absolute certainty?!

[-] realharo@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

So where do all the renters come from?

https://www.yicaiglobal.com/news/a-quarter-of-china-city-dwellers-rent-survey-shows - same website that your wikipedia link lists as source

But none of that is relevant to the article of this post. That article talks about money to complete unfinished projects. It's in the very first paragraph. There are people who took out loans to buy pre-construction apartments with plans to live there, who are now in trouble.

[-] PanArab@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

China made the right move here. If you think the IMF is right show me homeownership rates in countries that did as the IMF suggested.

There are people who took out loans to buy pre-construction apartments with plans to live there, who are now in trouble.

mostly foreign speculators, what's wrong with having them lose money?

There are people who took out loans to buy pre-construction apartments with plans to live there, who are now in trouble.

you do know that homelessness and lack of affordability in many Western countries has nothing to do with the supply or demand? there are more empty homes than there are homeless people

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 43 points 3 months ago

China rescues people, not investors. 😏

[-] protist@mander.xyz 37 points 3 months ago

That's quite a fantasy you're telling yourself. A huge portion of China's people's wealth is wrapped up in real estate, and tens of millions of stalled residential units have already been purchased by the Chinese people, and that money is now gone, taken by the developers.

The IMF recommendation here was "to deploy 'one-off' fiscal resources to complete and deliver pre-sold properties or compensate homebuyers." That would literally be rescuing the Chinese people who were burned by developers. Instead, the Chinese government is supporting the tech and manufacturing industries. Don't pretend like China is some paradise where the common people aren't getting fucked

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 27 points 3 months ago

Don’t pretend like China is some paradise where the common people aren’t getting fucked

[-] naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 months ago

Oh no! The millionaire is now not a billionaire... And the developer was sentenced to life in prison.

Anyway...

[-] yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 months ago

How is a family spending their money on an apartment they now won’t receive “a millionaire that is not a billionaire”? Not to mention, China loves billionaires. They have more of them than the US. It’s a fascistic shithole.

[-] coolusername@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Why are you lying? They bailed out buyers. And no it's not. Are you a fed? https://redsails.org/china-has-billionaires/

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

meanwhile in the real world

Chinese household savings hit another record high in 2024 https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/stock-market-today-dow-jones-bank-earnings-01-12-2024/card/chinese-household-savings-hit-another-record-high-xqyky00IsIe357rtJb4j

The real (inflation-adjusted) incomes of the poorest half of the Chinese population increased by more than four hundred percent from 1978 to 2015, while real incomes of the poorest half of the US population actually declined during the same time period. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w23119/w23119.pdf

From 1978 to 2000, the number of people in China living on under $1/day fell by 300 million, reversing a global trend of rising poverty that had lasted half a century (i.e. if China were excluded, the world’s total poverty population would have risen) https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/China’s-Economic-Growth-and-Poverty-Reduction-Angang-Linlin/c883fc7496aa1b920b05dc2546b880f54b9c77a4

From 2010 to 2019 (the most recent period for which uninterrupted data is available), the income of the poorest 20% in China increased even as a share of total income. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.DST.FRST.20?end=2019&locations=CN&start=2008

By the end of 2020, extreme poverty, defined as living on under a threshold of around $2 per day, had been eliminated in China. According to the World Bank, the Chinese government had spent $700 billion on poverty alleviation since 2014. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/31/world/asia/china-poverty-xi-jinping.html

https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2022/04/01/lifting-800-million-people-out-of-poverty-new-report-looks-at-lessons-from-china-s-experience

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Don't pretend like the average person in China is a fucking real-estate investor. This investment money is from the middle class and up i.e. people who don't need to be rescued. They're going to be fine. Even if their investments all go up in smoke, they won't be homeless. Common people just spend their paychecks and keep a little aside for savings, like everywhere else in the world.

[-] andyburke@fedia.io 14 points 3 months ago

My understanding is many everyday Chinese people bought real estate that wasn't yet built because demand was so high. Supposedly many of them sunk their whole life savings into units that developers had promised to build at some future point. That point seems unlikely to come if those developers go bankrupt, meaning that some decently large number of everyday people are going to lose their life savings.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

My understanding is middle class Chinese people bought real estate because they wanted passive income from investing in real-estate. China shouldn't have allowed them to do that but the solution isn't to bail out these developers. The actual solution is to make sure these people do not end up destitute because they wasted their money on gambling.

[-] Num10ck@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

it was basically the only kind of investment allowed in china.

[-] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 months ago

I don't know enough about this specific situation. But the history of the IMF and World Bank is such that, if they were to put out a statement saying that the sky is blue, I would immediately go and check if it had somehow changed colour.

[-] NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

Why subject your self and enslave yourself to the IMF?

[-] monovergent@lemmy.ml 22 points 3 months ago

IMF: Imperialist Monetary Fund

[-] TurboHarbinger@feddit.cl 1 points 3 months ago

Impossible Mission Force

[-] Sauvandu60@lemmy.ml 20 points 3 months ago

If it was my country's government, they would have accepted it without a second thought and the people have no say about it.

[-] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago

Isn't the rate of homeownership like 95%? Seems like a tough market.

this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
120 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32287 readers
372 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS