724
Paycheck rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 months ago by nifty@lemmy.world to c/196
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] StoneGender 212 points 2 months ago

Always talk about your pay. It's better for everyone

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 33 points 2 months ago

Employer: We fired Asafum for disobedience and poor conduct. (No mention whatsoever of retaliation for discussing pay.)

I was told when I was hired that they would fire anyone discussing pay. We work in a factory, there is no such thing as email proof when you're a meat machine with no email.

[-] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 months ago

Single party recording consent laws if you're lucky

[-] StoneGender 4 points 2 months ago

Well depending where you work that could have been illegal. This is where unions come in. I'm sorry to hear of such mistreatment my friend. I was also forced out of a job for talking about wages

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

I did that at my first job. I got docked pay for it. I didn't mind, the others used it to leverage for more.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 75 points 2 months ago

I often wonder similarly. comes down to double income. We went from families being raised on 40 hours a week labor to 100 or more.

[-] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 36 points 2 months ago

Yup. Something to remember whenever Forbes or WSJ publishes some feel-good article about how, "household income is keeping up with inflation."

What they don't mention is the "household" now includes everyone except the family dog. And even with everyone working, the quality of life continues to decline.

[-] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 28 points 2 months ago

As someone currently raosong 2 kids on a single fairly meager income, it comes down to budgeting, extreme price sensitivity and using the annual child tax credits as a cash injection to rebalance everything every 12 months and/or subsidize major needed purchases

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 28 points 2 months ago

imagine if that credit was removed due to certain politicians who respond with people need to budget better and bootstrap and crap.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Politicians should have to live on the federal minimum wage. Their jobs and staff can be managed by an office manager. Any personal wealth has to go into a blind trust so there's no cheating.

Let's see how fast that wage comes up.

[-] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

A trump presidency would be the beginning of the end. Republicans want complete control because they need it inact their cruel policies. When the common folk are on the streets hungry, the rich start to look awfully appetizing.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Don’t worry rich people, the police will get a wage increase to keep those hungry beggars away from you.

[-] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 1 points 2 months ago

I'd be more concerned about that if I were looking at my current economic situation continuing for the long term, but realistically once both kids are in school (which might happen within 12 months even!) my wife can start working, plus I haven't reached the coasting phase of my career yet, so I have plenty of opportunity to increase me income.

This year's tax credit will be paying off the last of the nasty debt accrued from my wifes various jobless phases before I went back to college and started making just enough that she didn't need to work anymore, so that'll be $200ish/mo back in our pockets to start building a proper emergency fund then figure it out from there. Plus my special needs child should have Medicaid very soon which will be another $200ish/mo back in our pockets as well given his very expensive appointments that had us to hit the deductible before March

[-] tmcgh@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

Glad I'm not alone in this. Tight budgeting that slowly trickles down to negative and then the tax credits come in and give us a boost to hopefully last the next year.

[-] Wilzax@lemmy.world 63 points 2 months ago

Food pantry time

[-] gearheart@lemm.ee 20 points 2 months ago

In addition to this way too many people I know are receiving SSI disability checks on top of that. 😅 I got folks on oxygen and walkers that get less SSI then a bunch of 20 year olds I know.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

The entire SSI/SSDI system is fucked. It's arbitrary and unnecessarily complex. Linking disability benefits to time worked is also cruel and arbitrary to younger workers who become disabled. And especially to people who never have the chance to build a work history at all. Then the idea that it has to be capped to an even outcome instead of a livable floor plus medical expenses...

That last part might just be why the younger people get paid more. They have less assets that count against the monthly pay.

But there is one thing SSI/SSDI have in common. The pay drops in step with money earned. So if you go get a job then you're not going to get much of an SSI check, if any at all. And SSDI can be outright revoked for working.

[-] fishbone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 months ago

I find this hard to believe. I'd be curious to hear roughly how many people you know that are on disability.

For those unaware, social security is extremely strict with earned income affecting benefits. It's also incredibly difficult to start getting disability benefits, even with mountains of documentation and medical records. It's quite common to have to appeal a case multiple times, and it often takes years for people to be approved.

[-] iheartneopets@lemm.ee 18 points 2 months ago

The trick is that they are working another job, and their partner is probably working two as well 🙃

[-] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

They aren't. Your coworkers are making more. Talk about pay with coworkers as you may be getting screwed

[-] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 5 points 2 months ago

My kiddo is just a toddler, but in our VHCOL area, at this age the only thing that really matters is childcare expenses. If we had family/grandparents taking care of them, the additional cost would be pretty minimal, in the scheme of things.

The max contribution to dependent FSA (tax free account for daycare) is a joke, less than 2mo of care.

The material things we've needed probably amount to less than one month of daycare expenses (diapers notwithstanding).

Saving for college, on the other hand...

this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
724 points (100.0% liked)

196

16359 readers
2217 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS