305
submitted 3 months ago by HailSeitan@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] iiGxC@slrpnk.net 68 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

If you didn't realize the importance of privacy after the patriot act and seeing the continuation of right wing authoritarianism, it's definitely time to get on board asap. Get yourself and your community on signal instead of texts and tuta or proton instead of regular email, use a vpn (mullvad or proton are solid), and depending on what kinds of actions you may or may not be interested in, learn how to use tails os and tor (try to find a copy of the darknetmarket bible for a good intro)

Edit: simplex is a good alternative to signal too, and if you have a google pixel, grapheneos is solid. Next time you're getting a new phone, get a used pixel and install it. On your computer, there's a lot of telemetry and sketchy stuff windows does, either research and disable that or switch to linux if you can

[-] recklessengagement@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

I've gotten nearly my entire circle on Signal and it's incredibly satisfying. No more worrying about seeing ads based on my text conversations.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 months ago

I don't want Authoritarianism period I don't care if it is left or right. Specific political beliefs are a distraction

[-] iiGxC@slrpnk.net 6 points 3 months ago

Fair, but at least in the US right wing auth is a much more direct and realistic threat to people and their privacy, although left auth is bad too

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] greywolf0x1@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

Please don't use Signal, the US government has all the keys. Self host XMPP, Matrix and SimpleX servers and make sure encryption is properly configured. If you're not generating your encryption keys, why should you use them?

[-] metacolon 32 points 3 months ago

Source? And fyi, if you use Signal you are generating your own encryption keys. Your private keys are generated on your phone and stay on it. So what gives you the idea that

the US government has all the keys

?? Sounds a lot like a conspiracy theory

[-] Jolteon@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 months ago

Plus, the signal client is open source. You can literally be 100% sure that your keys are being securely generated.

[-] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 8 points 3 months ago

I don't think Signal is unsafe, but agree that it is a weird middle ground. Depends on threat model, of course, but overall I would prefer something selfhostable - for the sake of independence, easier anonymity and censorship resistance. Plus, Signal by default doesn't allow desktop registration (and desktops are much easier to make private than phones), so you'd need either a VM or a command-line application for it, which is a big pet peeve of mine.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago

I think the best option is to communicate about alternatives. Maybe get a few close friends on each and then decide

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago

Everyone should care

[-] kbal@fedia.io 26 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Declarations of an intent to reimagine social media are all well and good, but joining the actually existing Fediverse is probably a more effective place to start.

It may not be precisely what you would've designed, not the People's Democratic Social Media of your dreams, not exactly like whatever Tarnoff imagined, but it is what we've got and as it continues to evolve it has considerable potential for new kinds of Internet-based social organization.

Organizing a boycott of Twitter is beside the point. All we need is for more people to join us in building up the better alternatives we already have. How is it even possible to put so much thought into the subject and not mention this?

[-] pinjure@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago

Playing devil's advocate here: bringing awareness to the problem (and explaining why it is a problem in the first place) to more people is a pretty important step into carrying out this 'social media reform'. Ultimately though I do agree that at least some mention of viable alternatives like the Fediverse would've been nice.

[-] Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 months ago

Why are Americans so focused on left vs right? Both parties are fascists they're just trying to take away different rights for the time being.

[-] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 19 points 3 months ago

Bear in mind that the US' main parties do not define the extent of Left and Right.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 months ago

Yeah the good guys are the centrists who want to continue the status quo: grind the poor people, make them pay fortunes for basic needs while making the rich richer.

[-] Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

sigh because that's definitely what I said

[-] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Oh right you are talking about the Dem vs Rep and not left vs right. I totally misunderstood you.

I'm so fed up with enlightened centrists that I judged you wrongly. My bad.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hemmes@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

What rights are the left trying to take away?

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] glowie@h4x0r.host 7 points 3 months ago

The Left think they're morally superior... Prepare to be downvoted to oblivion kek

Meanwhile, me a Libertarian Socialist laughs at both sides for being totalitarian in their own way.

One of them lies about it while virtue signalling empty promises and the other says "what are you gonna do about it, huh? Yeah, that's what I thought"

[-] Blackout@kbin.run 26 points 3 months ago

Well the left wants to treat people as people and the right want to treat immigrants, trans and women as garbage. Pretty sure that makes us a bit more moral.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 months ago
[-] Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

You are so far off base it's not even funny.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bad_alloc@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 3 months ago

If you truly believe you have nothing to hide, please post your full name and address, telephone number, email, bank balance, an assessment of your relationship to your parents and a link to your complete photo folder as a response to this comment.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] uriel238 18 points 3 months ago

In an ideal (post-scarcity communist) society, we should be able to be completely libertine without judgement from society or from government systems (so long as we're not causing harm). But as with the rest of this ideal we don't know if we can actually get there.

I have an ancient (2016) paper about potential joys of full disclosure (on Wordpress, if you're interested) that portends the enshittification of Google. But it points out Google's original business model, which was to have an enormous body of data that no human being got to look at directly (except their proper owners), and in the meantime the computers would report on observable trends and correlations.

In the end, it got messed up by the usual suspects: Advertising interests pressured Google to reveal more and more. Technicians abused their positions of power to stalk. The police state forced Google to fulfill reverse warrants and list all people near the scene of a crime, making them all suspects. Or to completely reveal all the data of a given suspect, which poisoned the whole idea of your own safe private place to track contacts, dates, travel, etc.

As it is, we need privacy specifically because of all those interests that would want to link our data to us. All the reasons for commercial or state interests to have our data are causes for them to not have our data.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago

I'm pretty sure Communism is definitely not an option. I don't want to starve or die today.

[-] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Always cracks me up to see people who champion open source alternatives hate on communism.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 months ago

I don't want to starve or die today.

Yep, that's why we need Communism and not Capitalism.

[-] uriel238 9 points 3 months ago

Communism is a far-off ideal, and we don't yet fully know how it would work, or how we'd get there, but people starving or dying would be a sign that it wasn't working.

You might be thinking of USSR, which sought to create a communist state, but was subject to internal corruption and outside threats (not to mention, Wilson sought a pact with the European states -- some of which were still monarchist -- to sanction trade with USSR, so it was at a considerable disadvantage from the get go.

But while USSR was going through its growing pains, the rest of us were going through the great depression, and those of us living in cardboard boxes and stacks of paint cans were wondering if Lenin had a point, the industrialists boozing and gambling with Hoover were admiring the Austrian fellow. Eventually those industrialists decided they need to create a propaganda package and teach it in our schools.

Huh. I can't post images anymore. I wonder if it's a browser problem or a Lemmy problem.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Its funny that people dying of starvation, in the USSR, is seen as a crime of communism but the exact same people will refuse to accept, by their own "logic", that would make the rest of ALL the starvation in the world a crime of capitalism.

How do you even start to deconstruct that kind of indoctrination?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 16 points 3 months ago

God damn this is a beautiful fucking website

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

the left is/will suffer more of the consequences

[-] AncientFutureNow@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

I thought the left was the ones who cared, and the right was all like "If you dont have anything to hide you shouldnt be worried" bootlickers.

[-] autonomoususer@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Are people are using WhatsApp, Discord and Instagram because it's left or right, and not because that's what they see everyone else is doing?

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 9 points 3 months ago

I use discord because that's what social circle use to communicate. No one is going to follow me if I switch apps or care about my suggestions.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] moistclump@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Great article actually. Thanks for sharing.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 3 months ago

I know my name will be on future lists when fascist purges start. Not because I'm some great though leader or anything. Just because they hate people with my beliefs.

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 6 points 3 months ago

Nice username

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
305 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

32091 readers
409 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS