606
submitted 1 month ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 121 points 1 month ago

Vance also said he was “outraged at Trump’s rhetoric, and I worry most of all about how welcome Muslim citizens feel in their own country. And there have always been demagogues willing to exploit the people who believe crazy shit. What seems different to me is that the Republican party offers nothing that’s as attractive as the demagogue.”

Exploit the people who believe crazy shit. Exactly what Vance is doing now that he’s sided with the demagogue.

Vance is even worse than a narcissist. He knows better and chooses to be evil for his own self-interest. I get why Trump likes him. He understands a life being driven by self-interest. And he knows Vance will burn everything down to advance he and Trump’s interests.

[-] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 44 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

These people are the worst indeed. They know it's wrong, they know it's evil but they're still doing it and doubling down whenever they can, just to get some power.

Fucking sociopaths.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

Vance was the liberal heartthrob until he went full MAGA so that he could become a senator.

[-] CameronDev@programming.dev 14 points 1 month ago

If we are lucky he is a trojan horse. Doubt it, but we could dream

[-] ImADifferentBird 11 points 1 month ago

Oh, he is 100% a Trojan horse, but the people he's a Trojan horse for are just as bad. Basically every shitty money-man in Silicon Valley that imagined himself a Randian Superman.

[-] 242@lemmy.cafe 70 points 1 month ago

JD Vance claimed he we was "just kidding" after texts saying he hated the police resurfaced after it was revealed he was arrested for breaking into an IKEA and abusing two dozen couches in one night.

[-] another@discuss.online 5 points 1 month ago
[-] iCy619@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago
[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Hopefully we don't catch him with CSAM (Couch Sexual Abuse Material) 🤮

[-] Psythik@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Since apparently it wasn't glaringly obvious to you, that comment was a joke.

[-] another@discuss.online 1 points 1 month ago

It was obvious, I just wanted to play. Something you don’t know how to do.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 62 points 1 month ago

Every single trump voter is morally reprehensible. Fucking traitors.

[-] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 month ago

Conservatives in general. Utterly without fail, I'm immediately repelled, uncanny valley style, whenever I accidentally trip into a conversation with one. Pray tell, what are they conserving except "shit for myself".

[-] at_an_angle@lemmy.one 8 points 1 month ago

I'm left, and one of my best friends is right.

Sure, we don't see eye to eye on a lot of politics, but we do have a lot of common ground. Even get into arguments now and again. But we always end up seeing things a little different and then telling some jokes about each other's parties after.

Immediately writing someone off because of a political view of a great way to get into an echo chamber.

[-] Kanzar@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Depends, some of us happen to belong to minorities that the conservative right are actively working to oppress, and that's not really something one can tolerate.

It'd be one thing if it was a disagreement about what colour to paint the new children's hospital.

But when they want ethnics in shit jobs for shit pay, queers dead, and AFAB barefoot and pregnant - they can fuck right off.

[-] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago

You're either privileged enougb to not belong to a minority your friend is actively voting to destroy or extremely forgiving. Either way, good for you.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

A medieval world view, near as I can tell.

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago

Pure jibbering, full-bodied, eyes wide, fear. Masked (poorly) by hatred, and xenophobia. Never resting. Always fearful, always cynical; always a new enemy just around the corner.

That's the vibe I get anyway.

[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 51 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Trump doesn't want a VP, he wants a doormat that will never pose a challenge to his power.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

Good news. JD Vance is 100% that guy.

[-] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago

And the elite that picked Vance want to use Trump’s VP slot as a back door into getting someone as awful as Vance as president without having to go through voters. He’s somehow even worse than Trump. Trump is vain conman. Vance is the real deal.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago

I love all this shit talking of Vance’s the press keeps digging up. And there seems to be so much of it! I’d love to see a steady drop of this all the way to Election Day, just to dig at Trump.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago

Seems like Republicans need some work on their vetting process.

[-] MediaSensationalism@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They had hoped it would demonstrate that fence-riding hardliners could be swayed to Trump's side. All it did was show that one was willing to sell out and fake it for a chance at the high chair.

With all the donor money passing hands to make Trump's campaign happen, the VP choice might have been over his head. Vance seems more like a pick the Heritage Foundation (Project 2025) would've made imo.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Trump promised “heavy vetting” in his last campaign!

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

That tiny part of me that loves stupid conspiracies keeps saying they picked him because his name sounds like Pence and either Donnie liked a name he sort of recognized, or if he says "Pence" by accident they can play it off.

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Weird man who ejaculates into inanimate couches calls running mate and fellow sexual deviant Trump, ‘morally reprehensible’

[-] magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org 23 points 1 month ago

If your biggest issue with the guy is fucking inanimate objects then you're not looking hard enough.

[-] TacticsConsort@yiffit.net 18 points 1 month ago

That may not be the biggest issue, but it's definitely the easiest to mock him over, and when you're a politician who needs your own voter base to take you seriously... Mockery is perhaps deadlier than getting called out for being a stain on humanity.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

he also fucks dolphins.

Or so I'm told. so those are animate objects.

[-] I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The ones that swim? Or the ones that take a 6V lantern battery?

[-] magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No, he's sexually attracted to software that emulates Power PC based Nintendo consoles.

[-] JASN_DE@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Weird man who ejaculates into inanimate couches

Which part of that is "morally reprehensible"?

[-] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago
[-] Trabic@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

Neither can socks.

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is just a simple reading comprehension error.

Vance “the couch fucker” is the one who called Trump morally reprehensible.

However, nobody said that the weird man ejaculating into couches was morally reprehensible. But I will say it is very weird.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 1 month ago

It's not. It's just weird.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

The Guardian Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [Medium] (Click to view Full Report)

The Guardian is rated with Medium Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

Bias: Left-Center
Factual Reporting: Mixed
Country: United Kingdom
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-guardian/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.

Footer

Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.

Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

[-] TacticsConsort@yiffit.net 5 points 1 month ago

Oh, this is a useful bot. Nice call, whoever added it

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Eh not really. MBFC is a website ran by some random man from North Carolina. It’s his opinions on what’s biased and what isn’t.

For example he will rate you lower if you’re critical of Israel. Meanwhile you can be a literal propaganda channel, RFA, and he will rate you highly as unbiased.

[-] flerp@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

We need a media bias fact checker fact checker

[-] JetpackJackson@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago

Did we lose the summary bot to get this one instead?

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago
[-] JetpackJackson@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

Bummer. I think I liked that one more

[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

while he isn't wrong, couchfuckers should also speak for themselves...

[-] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What I'd really like to know is if JD Vance would do something unconstitutional for Trump. If he wouldn't, and that could be the case since the man is just clearly an act, then you know what, he could be the best running mate for Trump because of how much he will eventually undermine him.

But I sort of feel that he will eventually get replaced by someone far, far worse, probably someone like Tucker Carlson. They will also wait to do it closer to the election, and I think it's why they might be projecting so much against Biden changing to Harris, they want to make the possibility impossible to oppose or at least make it so that it attracts controversy so that it is more difficult to make an issue of the many skeletons Tucker Carlson has in his closet. It's clear that Tucker Carlson has been getting pampered for a position of power in the US for quite a while.

[-] ef9357@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 month ago

In a childish singsong voice, “Tales one to know one,”

this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
606 points (100.0% liked)

News

22916 readers
3243 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS