166
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LucidNightmare@lemm.ee 39 points 7 months ago

This is why I keep saying polls don’t matter, besides the whole small percentage of people who actually answer random phone calls in 2024.

I literally just saw a “poll” come back as Kamala leading, but now this is not true, and she is behind?

Just vote, everyone. Ignore any polls, and vote.

[-] BingBong@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 months ago

How are the polls done anyways? If they rely on TV ads or random phone numbers a large portion of younger generations will-not be in the sample. Seems like more technically literate populations will be missed rendering the polls useless.

[-] LucidNightmare@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago

I’m sure each poll has their own way, but the most common way I’ve heard them do them is to call people.

Which is why I think we should ignore them completely. A lot of the younger generation will not answer a random phone call unless they were expecting a random number to call them. Even then, when they learn it is about a poll, they will probably decline it.

[-] Soggy@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

I arguably qualify as "younger generation" because I remember when the PlayStation was new, and yes random unknown calls are screened out every time.

[-] TheDannysaur@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

I have to say this is not a good take. Polls aren't all the same, but news outlets treat them like they are. Even the same pollsters come up with slightly different numbers each time they run them.

Because there is a certain amount of uncertainty doesn't make them invalid. We just need to be more educated on filtering the good from the bad.

You sort of have 2 options:

  1. Get educated on polling errors, the statistics, and the methodologies of the polls and arrive at your own conclusions.

  2. Ignore anything written by the main media outlets about polls, because looking at a single poll is really dumb.

They definitely do matter, and there's validity to them, but they don't claim to be the exact truth. If you know how to use them, they are quite helpful.

[-] LucidNightmare@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago

Seeing as how the “news” outlets would obviously loooooove a dictatorship (We have always been at war with East Asia) I truly think the best thing to do is ignore the polls. Full stop.

[-] NataliePortland@lemmy.ca 29 points 7 months ago

Thank you for posting all this content here jeffw I appreciate it.

[-] radivojevic@discuss.online 9 points 7 months ago
[-] yemmly@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Lol what is this meta shit that’s happening?

[-] JonsJava@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I think he's mad that he had comments removed.

[-] radivojevic@discuss.online 2 points 7 months ago
[-] JonsJava@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I think you have communities confused. Your rule 3 removal is politics, which neither Jeffw nor myself moderate.

[-] radivojevic@discuss.online 2 points 7 months ago

Whoops. Still. Heavy hands.

[-] Xanis@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Questions the validity of a removal based on information readily accessible.

Completely fucks up who did it despite information readily accessible.

Still thinks his opinion is above reproach.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

You are right about those other mods though.

[-] ArghlBarghlFooFera@feddit.org 16 points 7 months ago

How can he be ahead in ANY poll, JFC?

[-] exanime@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

if these polls are accurate, I am sad about what they imply of the population in the USA.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Half of Americans are uneducated, angry, and too ignorant to realize this dingus (Trump) is the poster child for everything they should hate. Instead, they focus hate on minorities and people who have no power.

[-] solrize@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago
[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

What the shit is polymarket?

[-] solrize@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

It's a prediction market using cryptocurrency. Look at predictit.net for a more traditional one.

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Oh so it's a useless thing for dupes and idiots okay. Thanks.

[-] solrize@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Shrug, it's a way to bet on election outcomes. No different from betting on football or the stock market. The betting lines really do tell you something about the underlying reality, since if you are sure the true odds are different, they give you a way to turn that knowledge into an expectation of cash. I don't participate myself, but you could interpret that as a weak belief that the current odds are about right.

That particular one comes with the stench of crypto but the original one (Iowa Electronic Markets) didn't have that. Of course I'd expect the offered odds at all those things to be the same, or else there is arbitrage available.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prediction_market

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iowa_Electronic_Markets

Added: I just found this and it is pretty good:

https://mickbransfield.com/2024/01/18/the-last-25-years-of-the-iowa-electronic-markets/

The "accuracy" section claims that from 1988 to 2008, the IEM outperformed polls. It doesn't say about post-2008 so maybe there is more gaming of the markets now.

this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
166 points (100.0% liked)

News

26876 readers
3922 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS