368
submitted 2 years ago by withersailor@aussie.zone to c/news@beehaw.org
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] storksforlegs@beehaw.org 73 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The fact that its been so normalized to be this openly shitty and callous toward frigging children... i dont even know how to react to this any more.

Im not saying its hopeless, but I feel like a lot of people on the "lets not let children go hungry" side of the fence are almost left speechless by these idiots. But i feel like thats almost part of their strategy - stunning the opposition. There has to be a better response.

What's the best way to respond to this kind of brazen cruelty? (Besides voting and campaigning for candidates who arent sociopathic).

[-] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 years ago

What's the best way to respond to this kind of brazen cruelty?

Voting is a must. Political apathy is how this stuff happens. Outside of voting, just being vocal about your distaste for these policies might help let people around you know that not everyone supports this. And if you come face to face with someone who is outspoken in their belief that some children deserve to starve, then you know who to avoid being around.

load more comments (25 replies)
[-] polygon@beehaw.org 22 points 2 years ago

Listen, this is hard thing for me to type but I think is relevant to the Republican mindset. Hundreds of children are being murdered in their classrooms. Literal murder. Of children. This is not enough to sway Republicans on gun control. If actual murder of 6 year olds doesn't have any effect on them, surely 6 year olds being hungry is not even going to make them blink. This is the reality with these people. They simply do not care about you, or your children, and everything they do is governed only by money and power.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] nzodd@beehaw.org 17 points 2 years ago

Oh this is nothing by comparison. Republicans also vote to legalize child rape (which they preciously insist on calling "child marriage") and are trying to bring back child labor because adults are getting fed up with unfair labor practices while little kids are easier to manipulate.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] evan_unit_one@beehaw.org 67 points 2 years ago

Beyond disgusting. Keep the kids hungry so they can't learn while sitting in their underfunded classrooms. Uneducated masses ripe for the conservative picking. Can't see through their lies if you've never been taught how to think. I hate it here...

[-] harbinger@lemmy.zip 46 points 2 years ago

Gosh... Just imagine that not guaranteeing a meal to children, preventing them from eating in some cases, is what you want more than anything.

Simply blows my mind.

[-] nzodd@beehaw.org 15 points 2 years ago

These people jerk off to the idea of hurting children. Every new policy Republicans come up with, whether its supporting ~~child marriage~~ legalized rape with 12 year olds or trying to bring back child labor, or making children too hungry to learn anything in school, makes their "moral" panic over a bunch of people who happen to be wearing dresses reading to kids even more hypocritical. Honestly I think it's the idea of children being functionally literate that probably terrifies them the most.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] shanghaibebop@beehaw.org 39 points 2 years ago

Why….. I grew up on free and reduced lunches. The return on investment here is immense.

[-] deedasmi@lemmy.timdn.com 29 points 2 years ago

I make six figures working at the highest levels of my career in support of government agencies. I used free/reduced lunches my entire schooling. It’s super ridiculous

[-] shanghaibebop@beehaw.org 14 points 2 years ago

Same, my property tax for this month alone will have more than paid for my entire schooling career of subsidized food.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Stoneykins@lemmy.one 37 points 2 years ago

Why aren't they self aware enough to realize they sound like cartoon villains?

[-] sirvesa@beehaw.org 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They are appealing to their voters who want them to "hurt the right people"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] doublejay3000@feddit.uk 33 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

imagine being in the strategy meeting with your team, when they suggest a play based on suspending withdrawing food from child would go well with your voters.

imagine agreeing to go with it. getting a speech written about it and one day standing at the lectern to say in front of crowd of assembled people "it is not our responsiblity to feed children". and then pausing for applause and going home and telling your spouse, "today went great".

in this supply chain of inhumanity, there were so many opportunities for the heart to say "yo...something is off here.....cant quite put my finger on it.......but it doesnt seem.....right ?."

to sail through all those checkpoints of human decency, and go through with it, is nothing less than psychopathy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lyam23@beehaw.org 32 points 2 years ago

It's really quite shocking how the GOP agenda can be predicted by asking yourself, "What's the worst thing someone would in a given situation?". What's even more shocking is that they have engineered the political framework to disproportionately grant them enough power to sometimes pass these regressive policies. But for most of America, sigh, just another Thursday...

[-] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.one 28 points 2 years ago

“It’s not enough that I should eat, children should starve. “ -the gop.

[-] TechyDad@beehaw.org 17 points 2 years ago

Either that or "I don't believe that anyone is starving. I just ate a large lunch so obviously nobody is going hungry."

They only recognize that something is real when it affects them personally. If it doesn't then they'll either claim the thing doesn't exist or will say it's that person's fault that they are going through that (likely for being "too lazy" to pull themselves up by their bootstraps).

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Gork@beehaw.org 24 points 2 years ago

How did this get normalized? Why is this even something that is even considered debatable? As a society, feeding our children should be the first priority.

I'm flubbered.

[-] ghostalmedia@beehaw.org 14 points 2 years ago

Echo chambers that reinforce the lie that democrats want to take your money to pay for irresponsible people’s children.

[-] jabjoe@feddit.uk 16 points 2 years ago

Maybe they are irresponsible, but that's not their kids fault. Feeding kids regardless of who their parents are, is a basic morality thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Plume@beehaw.org 24 points 2 years ago

Tearing down women's rights. Ruining queer people's life, especially trans people. Making sure children can't eat for free. Wow. Quite the priorities over at the Republican party.

I'm not American, I've just been looking from afar for a long time now. But from everything I'm seeing... it feels like they're going to be in for quite the rude awakening in 2024.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Myaa@beehaw.org 22 points 2 years ago

You know, I try to keep an open mind and try to understand how the other side could come to the conclusions they do, but sometimes they really make it difficult. I genuinely don't get how this could be construed as anything other than malicious. What's the benefit in this? How is this "thinking of the children?" How did a political party come to represent views that are so aggressively anti-humanity? It's such a bizarre platform to attach yourself to so proudly and openly.

[-] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 22 points 2 years ago

They're not even bothering to lie any more, and yet everyone still votes for them.

You know that scene in Final Fantasy 8 where Edea announces her evil plan to a huge crowd and calls them morons and they all clap and cheer? This is like that.

[-] Shhalahr@beehaw.org 22 points 2 years ago

What. The. Fuck. Is wrong. With. These people?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Jezebelley@kbin.social 22 points 2 years ago

They care about children until they’re born then they want nothing to do with them. Oh wait they also use children to pass anti lgbt legislation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bear_delune@beehaw.org 21 points 2 years ago

The whole point in these kind of moves is to cause congestion and exhaustion in political movement.

It’s a struggle to campaign for actual improvements when we’re all stuck fighting garbage like this all the time.

It’s deliberate obstruction and a standard GOP play

[-] AllonzeeLV@vlemmy.net 20 points 2 years ago

My Daily Reminder that this is a gold plated dystopia.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UnhealthyPersona@beehaw.org 20 points 2 years ago

What's crazy to me is it seems like they just want children to suffer. They want to force women to give birth, but then don't give a shit about what happens to the children after. On top of that, it's like they are trying to make them suffer even more for their parents being unable to provide.

I could somewhat get attacking programs for adults. Still disagree, but I guess it's the "they should be able to provide for themselves" mentality. But then doing this for children when they are literally unable to provide for themselves or have any responsibility for being hungry. Yes, let's make the helpless children suffer.

Disgusting times we live in.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] UnderlyingLogic@beehaw.org 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's just cruel. A disgusting, cruel mindset from those who genuinely just want to hurt others.

Anyone supporting this lacks the most basic of morals. There is no excuse for this.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] HappyMeatbag@beehaw.org 17 points 2 years ago

I’m reluctant to use the word “evil”, but I can’t think of another word that accurately describes their goals and behavior. They simply hate anyone who isn’t just like them. Different race? SUFFER AND DIE. Different economic bracket? SUFFER AND DIE. Different beliefs on sexuality? SUFFER AND DIE.

They think that others are a threat to the “moral fabric” of America, but they themselves are a threat to the mere existence of millions of Americans.

[-] nzodd@beehaw.org 17 points 2 years ago

Attention conservatives: you can't ~~marry~~ legally rape children or force them into child labor if you already starved them to death first.

load more comments (1 replies)

These are the same people who can expense up to $79 per day for food and drink. They're fine taking hand outs, they just don't want you to have any.

[-] Spzi@lemmy.click 16 points 2 years ago

"There is no such thing as a free lunch", they said :(

To pull more of the article into the comment section:

The Republican Study Committee (of which some three-quarters of House Republicans are members) on Wednesday released its desired 2024 budget, in which the party boldly declares its priority to eliminate the Community Eligibility Provision, or CEP, from the School Lunch Program. Why? Because “CEP allows certain schools to provide free school lunches regardless of the individual eligibility of each student.”

Of note is that the CEP is not even something every school participates in; it is a meal service program reserved for qualifying schools and districts in low-income areas. The program enables schools that predominantly serve children from low-income backgrounds to offer all students free breakfast and lunch, instead of means-testing them and having to manage collecting applications on an individual basis. As with many universal-oriented programs, it is more practically efficient and, as a bonus, lifts all boats. This is what Republicans are looking to eliminate.

It’s the kind of provision that many would want every school to participate in. Why not guarantee all our children are well fed as they learn and think about our world and their place in it, after all?

[-] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 16 points 2 years ago

what they fail to understand is that for poorer communities, kids rely on these lunches for meals when their families can't afford to buy food

[-] KickMeElmo@sopuli.xyz 31 points 2 years ago

No, they understand, they just don't care.

[-] anji@lemmy.anji.nl 20 points 2 years ago

No, they understand and they care... They want the poor to be trapped by debt and struggling starting at a young age.

[-] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 2 years ago

And they want those children to have jobs to pay for their own lunches.

"Toughen up little Suzie, you gotta get back to work if you want to eat."

Fucking psychopaths

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] whinestone_cowboy@beehaw.org 16 points 2 years ago

God this is depressing. What kind of world do we live in and when will we start creating a better one?

[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one 14 points 2 years ago

Getting rid of current Republican office-holders would be one place to start. Voting matters, and shit like this is why.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] literallyacat@beehaw.org 15 points 2 years ago

Give the poor nothing and we will have nothing left to lose. eyes guillotine hungrily

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SnowboardBum@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago

Very on brand for them. Especially after they denied free school lunch in North Dakota and turned around a week or so later and raised their daily meal allowance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Lells@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago

Aren't these the same people who claim that an unborn baby has every right to live, even if they're only like 4 cells and still dividing? Does like... that right to life just end once they're birthed? I really don't get how these people justify their stupidity.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Gollan@beehaw.org 15 points 2 years ago

Given that the Republicans are nominally a Christian party, has no one in the party had a look at what Jesus taught about feeding the hungry? It is pretty clear, and it is NOT this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] matzah 14 points 2 years ago

Really putting evil front and center this time, huh.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] fritobugger@vlemmy.net 13 points 2 years ago

Just normal GOP evil.

[-] Banzai51@midwest.social 13 points 2 years ago

Fuck your kids, billionaires need yet another tax break. -Republicans.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SmugBedBug@lemmy.iswhereits.at 12 points 2 years ago

It's like they say, universal free school meals leads to a lazy population and communism.

Jokes aside, I really don't understand their fear of anything that resembles socialized programs.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Pro-life, pro-child, pro-family values 👍🤗💖💯

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
368 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22097 readers
116 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS