433

Not sure what the deal is with tennis balls, raquet balls hurt a whole lot more!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Cobrachicken@lemmy.world 101 points 4 months ago

""[It's] utterly ridiculous," Robert Bauman, a Milwaukee City Alderman who proposed adding guns to that city ordinance, told ABC News. "I mean, I could just picture this image of somebody coming up to the entry point with, you know, an AR-15 strapped over one shoulder, a long rifle over another, and two pistols in his belt, and the cops asking him, 'You got any tennis balls?'"

^^I would pay money to see that scene^^

[-] Pandantic@midwest.social 19 points 4 months ago

Which one of you lemmings in Milwaukee gonna go show off your 2nd amendment rights? Leave the tennis balls at home, tho!

[-] krelvar@lemmy.world 61 points 4 months ago

Cut a hole in the tennis ball, stick it on the muzzle of your AR-15 and call it a silencer. Bet you could smuggle in a number of tennis balls that way

[-] too_high_for_this@lemmy.world 38 points 4 months ago

The ATF would like to disagree and kill your dog

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 months ago

What if my dog is my silencer?

[-] PyroNeurosis 9 points 4 months ago

As long as you've accounted for point-of-impact shift and paid your $200 tax, you're good to go.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 months ago

No, I will not and this Davey Crockett tactical nuke in my home museum agrees.

This is a Wasteland 2 joke I do not have a tactical nuke, a silencer, or even a working gun. I do have a 100 plus year old broken revolver though.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Never block your muzzle or you risk a "Bugs Bunny".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlfGZ7AU5Cs

[-] Pacmanlives@lemmy.world 32 points 4 months ago

That’s disappointing that tennis balls will not be allowed. Do the people with walkers coat check them in with there guns?

[-] Zak@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

No. They don't have to coat check the guns.

[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 25 points 4 months ago

If they’re going to allow guns in the RNC, I hope they at least manage to round up a handful of competent secret service agents, if that still exists.

[-] Darukhnarn@feddit.de 49 points 4 months ago

Im fine with republicans getting the secret detail they deserve.

[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

No, that’s not okay. People killing politicians to advance a political agenda is chaos writ large. It cannot be allowed to happen.

[-] StrongHorseWeakNeigh@lemmy.world 50 points 4 months ago

While I concur that assassination has no place in a functional democracy; if Hitler had been assassinated during WW2 it would have surely been chaotic for Germany. Therein lies the question: is chaos inherently worse than an actively unjust order?

[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

You can play all the theoretical moral games you want. Political assassinations of leaders is madness.

[-] WraithGear@lemmy.world 30 points 4 months ago

But ethically better then war, or letting them harm the vulnerable

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago

Everyone in Hitler's orbit was just as hateful as he was. But in many cases, they were smarter and less insane. Killing Hitler could have easily made WW2 a lot worse for everyone. What if you assassinated Hitler only to cause the Nazis to win?

[-] StrongHorseWeakNeigh@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

Maybe. Maybe it would have accelerated the decline of the third reich. It's impossible to know and fruitless to theorize about.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Of course it can't. Unless they are dumb enough to let the whole crowd be armed. At that point you just can't fix stupid. After all, in this case it is vigilante justice really. Since he is a convicted felon. But I suspect he will be behind bulletproof glass or something.

[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

You’re probably right that Trump will be behind bulletproof glass, but the threat of a domestic terrorist attack there did just go up about a thousand percent.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

They aren't allowing them in the RNC, that's the hard perimeter established by the SS.

The soft perimeter surrounding that is where they allow guns but not tennis balls.

[-] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 months ago

That abbreviation is kinda unlucky, ...you know

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 23 points 4 months ago

but tennis balls will not

Are they worried that Ryoma Hoshi might be real?

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

My life is being infected with DRv3.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mokus 23 points 4 months ago

This tells me the explosives they found in Crooks’ vehicle were hidden in tennis balls

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The restriction on tennis balls is apparently a city restriction that pre-dates the attempt so... 🤔🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤔

[-] mokus 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Aww that’s a lot less silly and therefore less fun (still pretty silly though I guess)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] vegeta@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago

I want the right to bare balls

[-] Contravariant@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Not sure if that's what's meant by 'open carry'

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 21 points 4 months ago

They should be allowed inside the venue. After all, gun free zones are a big problem.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago

I wonder what would happen if someone drove by one of those places and played bullet sounds on their ghetto blaster...

[-] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

Or the sounds of a tennis match

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Today@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

I took a golf ball to the forehead off a tee box. That wasn't fun.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

Republican events and rallies are the one place I support as many guns as possible being there.

[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 8 points 4 months ago

They should live their values.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 11 points 4 months ago

trump is a World Wrestling Entertainment Hall of Famer

Odds are they are terrified that people will toss a tennis ball around the same way people tossed a beach ball around to "protest" Super Roman (... while making sure to buy every available ticket).

[-] recapitated@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

How about a loaded soup-can gauge shotgun?

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

You kid, but the 2 gauge (not a typo!) "Punt Gun" was a thing! Used for shooting mass numbers of ducks and geese!

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

both these guys were deaf shortly after firing this

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Pretty sure this photo was just for scale, the normal use case was mounted in a small boat or "Punt".

But geeze... these pictures...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

This sounds like a Monty Python sketch or something. It's just so absurdist.

[-] zcd@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 months ago

Please proceed

[-] Pandantic@midwest.social 7 points 4 months ago

But what if my tennis ball is a gun? Which law overrides the other?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sudo42@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Not sure what the deal is with tennis balls, raquet balls hurt a whole lot more!

They consider tennis balls to be raquetball furries.

[-] thirstyhyena@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Are 4G/5G phones allowed? Because those can fry your brain.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
433 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3457 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS