168
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by TheTwelveYearOld@lemmy.world to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

https://reddit.com/r/privacy/comments/1dofyj1/how_did_mozilla_firefox_go_from_being_the_best/

Post Text

Seriously, every post I read that's upvoted is smack talking Mozilla in every way possible and it just so happens to take place exactly when Google quietly announces Manifest V3. Mozilla is not our enemy, Google is. Don't let all these bot upvoted comments and posts let you forget that. Has Mozilla made some questionable moves lately? Yeah.. the biggest being the purchase of Anonym. https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/mozilla-anonym-raising-the-bar-for-privacy-preserving-digital-advertising/

We'll just have to wait and see how that turns out. But I found it amusing when I saw this post and it got so many upvotes immediately after Mozilla announced the purchase. https://www.reddit.com/r/privacy/comments/1dkujuh/mozilla_anonym_is_a_datahoovering_monster/

Then Mozilla allegedly fired someone because he has cancer. https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/mozilla-is-trying-to-push-me-out-because-i-have-cancer-cpo-says-in-bombshell-lawsuit/ar-BB1oOjOZ

Then I was reading Mozilla android browser is suddenly the worst and least secure android browser.

It's never ending.. Honestly I think I am just going to take some time away from Reddit because it's becoming such a corporate shill and bot upvoted cesspool. I'm sure this will get heavily down-voted but I just wanted to give my two cents. Mozilla will always be my preferred choice for privacy and security and unless I see some actual changes within the browsers no one will ever convince me otherwise.

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works 146 points 5 months ago

I don't trust Reddit anymore, and to my knowledge Mozilla has always put user rights before corporate greed. Also Mozilla is a sort of non profit. So you're gonna need more than anecdotes to change my mind.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 32 points 5 months ago

Mozilla acquiring an ad company is something of a bad sign though.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 60 points 5 months ago

The BBC is a respected broadcaster in the UK that shows no ads as it is government funded. They have investments abroad that have ads showing their programs, for profit to fund more programming. It doesn't change their mission. In fact, some shows have cone from their for-profit division. You can have values and be for the people but still live on the real world.

[-] NOP@lemmy.zip 9 points 5 months ago

No, it's not government funded. It's funded by the people from a yearly licence fee, so has no ads. This is how it stays politically impartial too (mostly).

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 9 points 4 months ago

Yes, a licence fee approved by government and given to the BBC. Its not optional. Its a tax by another name with some arms length from the government to try to prevent conflict of interest. It does OK at that but not great.

However the point is that you can mix profitable endeavors successfully into a non profit to improve the non profit and fund the non profit parts. The problem is when the tail wags the dog.

[-] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

HAHAHAHAH are you fucking seriously comparing a company with free overhead to one that doesn't? Fuck thst might take the cake for the dumbest shit I've seen all day.πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 7 points 4 months ago

You do of course realise that despite the name, it is not a company?

When you rudely try to correct someone, but are inaccurate, you make yourself look like even dumber than what you complain about.

[-] cupcakezealot 1 points 4 months ago

creating a privacy friendly ad organization for people as an alternative to google is what they should be doing.

[-] Hugin@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Not always look at pocket or the mr robot promo.

[-] tyler@programming.dev 58 points 5 months ago

It’s happening on lemmy too. People making posts in multiple subs saying that FF is super buggy, etc.

[-] realbadat@programming.dev 13 points 5 months ago

I wouldn't say they are wrong, I've got plenty of issues with Firefox that aren't in chromium-based browsers. Mostly with media playback, but on Android the toolbar hide on scroll is a mess, no matter what it just covers the page. Makes it really hard to use a menu or click a button depending on where it is. I also have some locally run services that throw js errors in FF but not in cromite, chromium, or chrome.

Doesn't mean I don't prefer FF because I acknowledge it has problems. I don't generally view videos in my browser anyway, and I disable the hide-on-scroll feature. And if I have a particularly problematic site (the js errors), I open cromite or whatever.

The bigger issue isn't people talking about bugs, but downplaying the role the foundation plays in supporting users. That, imo, is where a lot of misinformation and disinformation seems to live.

[-] cupcakezealot 31 points 5 months ago

They're still a great company reddit just likes to whine and argue

[-] LordCrom@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago

Reddit is full of bots posting whatever the payer wants to promote. This sudden hatred of Firefox by all these reddit accounts sure does line up with Chrome manifest V3 coming out ..... Coincidence? I think not

[-] Hugin@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

Firefox and it's forks are the best browsers. They are still not very good. There are a ton of bad decisions and poor code. From old legacy stuff like how user profiles are stored to closed source shit like pocket.

The mozilla foundation has been on a downhill slide since google hired the skilled programmers to make chrome. Bad leadership,poor spending, and stupid priorities.

So yes firefox is the best browser. But that's kind of like being the best cable company. Not exactly a great thing.

[-] D_Air1@lemmy.ml 14 points 4 months ago

There are real issues with Mozilla, but most of these people are complaining about nothing. Constantly whining about every little thing to the point you would think they are saying they are worse than Google.

[-] raph55@jlai.lu 14 points 5 months ago

I stopped using Firefox for 2-3 years before coming back. FF WAS very buggy, crashing almost every day. I understand why it has a bad reputation.

When I reinstalled FF the bugs were gone, I hope it stays that way.

[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

The Mozilla corp burns user goodwill like it's an unlimited resource. A lot of us are just sick of Mozilla's corporate shit.

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

It never had a majority of the market.

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

in my experience the browser went through a poor engineering phase just as Chrome was getting good, and that continued for quite some time, the mobile browser took a very wayward turn a few years ago

oddly this happened at the same time as Rust and Firefox OS appeared which i think are phenomenal achievements

so Chrome ate Firefox's lunch and the series of weird CEOs have compounded that by attempting to cover it up with progressive sounding PR

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The amount of fucks I give about what reddit thinks is practically negative at this point. Bot-infected, corporate, ad-obscured, power-tripping-mod, anti-user, sell-your-content-to-AI toxic swamp Reddit.

[-] ssm@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

OP of the reddit post is doing a pretty good job pointing out themselves why Mozilla is hated. They pretend to be pro-privacy and defend the internet from Google, while making mad cash from none other than google, introducing garbage like DoH to cloudflare, pocket, cliqz in Germany, and cucking to drm standards. Anonym is just the latest trash on heap that is Mozilla's track record.

There are alternative browsers (webengine (stripped down blink), webkit, Ladybird, Netsurf, text only (in order of supported features)). Do they support every web standard perfectly? Do they have the same level of extension support? Maybe not, but they're good enough for most usecases. Stop pretending Mozilla and Google are the only options.

[-] glowie@h4x0r.host 3 points 5 months ago

Downhill ever since Brendan Eich left /s

[-] PanArab@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

It all started with Apple choosing KDE's KHTML instead of Gecko. Then it was compounded when Chrome forked WebKit to develop Chromium. Mozilla tried to modernize their engine but it was too little too late with the rise of the mobile web.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 points 5 months ago

Yes, a licence fee approved by government and given to the BBC. Its not optional. Its a tax by another name with some arms length from the government to try to prevent conflict of interest. It does OK at that but not great.

this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
168 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

17938 readers
2 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS