233
submitted 4 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

It's part of a push by Democrats to highlight the electoral contrast over reproductive rights. Before the vote, GOP senators said they favor legal IVF but prefer a narrower bill.

Senate Republicans blocked a Democratic-led bill Thursday to codify broad federal protections for in vitro fertilization in the midst of a growing partisan clash over reproductive rights in the United States.

The vote was 48-47, with just two Republicans voting for it: Sens. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, and Susan Collins, R-Maine. Others in the GOP said the legislation went too far, instead signing on to a scaled-back version that Democrats said was ineffectual.

The Right To IVF Act was brought up for a vote by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., to put the GOP in a political predicament less than five months before the 2024 elections. Democrats say the conservative-led Supreme Court’s decision in 2022 to eliminate federal abortion rights means that access to contraception and IVF are also at risk.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 800XL@lemmy.world 32 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Reminds me of that poem:

_First they came for abortion, and I did not speak out— Because I was not need an abortion.

Then they came for IVF, and I did not speak out— Because I did not need IVF.

Then they came for the Stork—and there was no one left to speak for him._

In all seriousness though, fuck this shit. This is purely religious driven bullshit. Separation of church and state.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

Goes beyond religion at this point it is all about controlling women and turning them into birthing factorys.

[-] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago

I think it's just cruelty and some perverted sense of constructionism honestly.

If it were about forcing birth, they'd be in favor of forcing all forms of IVF to be legal. Probably in favor of deregulating it and removing any form of sane protections.

[-] altus@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago

it is my understanding religious engagement is declining in the US, however it seems that religious laws are increasing. Why aren't people voting their conscience?

[-] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Old white men block the ability of everyone else to have the right to self determination. News at 11.

[-] heavy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago

Sorry I'm a little stupid, why are Republicans against IVF? Don't they want people to give birth?

[-] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 months ago

Because there's all these fertilized eggs that don't become people. If you believe life begins at conception, then IVF kills a lot.

It's all unscientific nonsense, and requires you to ignore how many fertilized eggs don't become a viable fetus, but the anti-abortion stance has never been about science. It's about control.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Since in order to control women, they need to pretend that an embryo is a human being, they have to act like embryos are human beings in other contexts.

IVF results in more embryos than the ones that are implanted.

[-] tiefling 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yes but not that kind of birth

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

So this will be reintroduced the next time Democrats have the numbers to pass it, right?

this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
233 points (100.0% liked)

News

23310 readers
3298 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS