857
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ptz@dubvee.org 192 points 5 months ago

I'm with you on what the meme is trying to say, but the bottom track needs to be shown looping around to the Republican track and running over everyone.

Because that's where the third track leads.

[-] bazus1@lemmy.world 53 points 5 months ago

Like so?
Also, let's have 'im on the track too.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

"Oh, no, I'm not in any of those groups on the track, so I can safely not vote and have a clear conscience as it crushes everyone!"

Then they came for me...

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] CompassRed@discuss.tchncs.de 35 points 5 months ago

Doesn't matter where the track leads if the trolley can't get to it. It could lead to rainbows and sunshine, but that isn't where the trolley is headed because there is no possibility that someone other than Trump or Biden is elected president. A few cry babies voting third party won't get some third person elected. A vote for the third track is a vote for a track that will not be ridden.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Pacmanlives@lemmy.world 32 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

As someone who for the first time did not vote in 2016. I started voting in the Bush era. I fully agree, no action leads to fascism apparently. Don’t do what I did because I was pissed that Bernie was cheated out of the nomination. Vote or Trump will be back in office.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ignotum@lemmy.world 98 points 5 months ago

I'm guessing the joke is that third party voters ignore the trolley about to go down one of two paths, instead deciding to stand next to a short piece of track connected to nothing with no trolley on it, so they can pretend the imminent disaster happening on the other track isn't real

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 48 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

And there's also a contingent of people on the trolley who are trying to get it to slow down, working their asses off to improve long term actual outcomes in the real world, whether related or not to the little lever, and the guy standing next to the empty disconnected track is claiming to be one of them and saying you must be against them and how dare you, you person-running-over-enabling monster, if you say anything against his strategy.

[-] Phegan@lemmy.world 61 points 5 months ago

The problem is that we have two choices, and we will never not have two choices unless we do something about it. I can both say that Joe Biden sucks and we should do better and also vote for him because the other option is worse. This discourse that makes it seem like any criticism of Biden is pro trump is how we will end up in a slightly less terrible place. Cool. Really looking forward to that.

Also like what the fuck...I guess we have to kill Palestinians no matter what.

There is a third fucking option and it's not doing a genocide.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 54 points 5 months ago

There is a third fucking option and it's not doing a genocide.

That's only an option if you have a viable strategy for accomplishing it.

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 30 points 5 months ago

Which, of course, they don't. It's a vanity vote. They want to pretend they have actually done something without actually having to do anything of consequence.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 26 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The problem is that we have two choices

The problem is that we don't. If you're not in a "swing" state, all the votes in the world for Joe Biden are meaningless. Win California by another million votes. Win it by another 10M. Have every single eligible voter in California turn up and vote for Joe Biden. He still loses the EC when the SCOTUS tells Arizona to stop counting ballots the minute Trump is in the lead.

Also like what the fuck…I guess we have to kill Palestinians no matter what.

We have to keep sending money to Israel because its the means by which we control the Suez Canal.

Except... the Houthis have control over the back end of the canal so long as they're able to scare off shipping in the Gulf of Adan. So now we're endorsing a genocide just for shits and giggles.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 43 points 5 months ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] cerement@slrpnk.net 42 points 5 months ago
[-] Godric@lemmy.world 83 points 5 months ago

Roe v Wade sends their regards.

[-] cerement@slrpnk.net 27 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

the decision that Blue did absolutely nothing to protect even though they knew full well Red would kill it any chance they got?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RandomGuy79@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago
[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 5 months ago

Thank you for demonstrating your ignorance, instead of making us speculate on it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 39 points 5 months ago
[-] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 37 points 5 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] retrospectology@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago

Simplistic philosophy for simplistic minds.

It's not a trolley problem, and even if it were the consequences of greenlighting democratic support for genocide are not fully represented appropriately in this image.

[-] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 35 points 5 months ago

It is a trolley problem for leftwing voters.

We all know what happens if the Republicans get in - they do what they want, and what they want is fervent, unquestioning support of Israel, and to continue trampling on the rights of millions of minorities.

That's where the Trolley goes if the leftwing can't agree on what it wants to do.

While I agree that you're right in stating that the long-term consequences of allowing democrats to get away with this aren't properly laid out, what's the alternative exactly?

You could argue to vote an independent, but if everybody disagrees on which independent to vote for, then you fragment the leftwing and the Republicans get a free lunch.

You could argue to refuse to vote to teach the democrat party a lesson, which sounds nice, but every lost vote against the Republicans only helps bring them closer to victory.

If you've got another idea, then by all means go ahead, but those are the two I hear over and over again.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] CompassRed@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 5 months ago

It's funny you say the philosophy is simple when strategic voting requires multiple layers of analysis and voting for bubblegum ice cream just amounts to what feels good. You can't bring yourself to accept the reality of the situation, so you pretend like the problem is easy to solve if you just ignore it. That's truly simple minded. Pathetic projection on your part.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago

It’s interesting how much the vote DOES resemble a trolley problem. Generally, the only real point in favor of not pulling the lever is “You’re killing someone, it’s immoral to get involved. Life shouldn’t be in your hands.”

Which is still setting aside all the conscious choice by other human beings that IS happening come election season. Probably the biggest way it diverges is that a trolley is moving under its own “natural” momentum. In reality, it’s as though some Nazis are pulling the trolley along the track to the 5 people.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 5 months ago

this one is actually really funny, i like this one.

Good shit.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 32 points 5 months ago

I appreciate OPs honesty that Palestinians are dead either way.

[-] ashok36@lemmy.world 30 points 5 months ago

Less palestinians will die under Biden. People who says "how could it be any worse?" have a severe lack of imagination and/or historical knowledge.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago

Less palestinians will die under Biden.

This claim is absolutely meaningless without evidence and some indication about how the situation resolves.

There's a very good chance the moment Biden knows he's won the election he'll call you Bibi and go "thanks for your patience. Go nuts."

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 17 points 5 months ago

I mean the right has already made it clear that they're 100% pro genocide, straight up recommending that every Palestinian is killed. The worst Biden could possibly do is be as bad as Trump.

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago

I hope this post gets a lot of tankie comments. They’ll be flockin’ to a blockin’

Heh. See, cause. It rhymes. So.

The one yesterday had that commenter who was all “what’s this? Oh it took me a second cause I blocked all the tankies” and that’s when I realized I forgot to block lemmy.ml. Now that that’s done, it’s just onsie-twosies. It’s a bright, bright sunshiney day.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] BadlyTimedLuck@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago

Guys, I don't know what's going on in the world and their wars. I just want a president who isn't abhorently evil. Do we have to revolutionize to find that 3rd option orrr?

[-] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 23 points 5 months ago

Do we have to revolutionize to find that 3rd option

Pretty much. It's against the interest of both parties to have more options because both are near-guaranteed to lose power if there were more options.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 months ago

I assume your "abhorently evil" comment is based off support of the genocide in Palestine (which is a completely reasonable thing to describe as abhorently evil, I'm just being clear about my premise).

In which case, sorry, bad news, you can't have that. Your options this time round are genocide supporter or genocide supporter. Somewhere down the line, years from now, the US electoral system may have been sufficiently reformed to make third parties viable. But this year that's not going to happen.

So that decision is completely out of your hands. But here's what you do get to decide; you can have an outright fascist, leading a party of outright fascists who have openly publicised their plans to turn your country into a fascist theocracy. Or you can have the guys who strengthened workers rights and went after major companies for union busting, hit Microsoft for $20 billion in back taxes, had the FBI raid a major landlord for illegal price hikes, brought antitrust lawsuits against Amazon and several other large tech firms, and secured billions in aid for Ukraine in their fight for their freedom. And that is literally just a tiny sampling of the good things that Biden's government has done.

I don't even see how that's a choice. One of these two options is clearly and manifestly better than the other, no matter how disgusting it feels. A vote for Biden is not an endorsement of his position on Gaza. It is a tactical choice, nothing more. And if nothing else, its a tactical choice that will prevent the fascists from filling even more seats on the supreme court.

It sucks, but those are the only options. Sometimes life just be like that.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] specters@lemmy.ml 23 points 5 months ago

stop the trolley, dumb fucks 😂

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago

I like that, as a nation, we are admitting that we'll enable the killing of innocent children. It's important to be honest with ourselves about who we are as a country.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] darth_tiktaalik@lemmy.ml 18 points 5 months ago

I'm assuming the third track being entirely disconnected and therefore not a real option is intentional.

Either way, accurate

[-] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 18 points 5 months ago

How do you get electoral reform if you keep voting for the two major parties that both benefit from it and want to keep it?

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Samvega 17 points 5 months ago

Whatever happens, we're all dead. The only question is whether, along the way, we act in a more moral or less moral way.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 16 points 5 months ago

And the third track has buffers at both ends, is covered in weeds and somebody has stolen some of the sleepers to make a nice planter for their garden.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
857 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

5512 readers
396 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS