647
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 180 points 5 months ago

A character that compulsively fights every human they meet is a great way to frustrate a DM with chaos.

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 114 points 5 months ago

Player: why do I feel that the entire universe is turning against me? All I wanted to do was kill literally everyone.

[-] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I'm not going to beat them to death, just beat them until they have detached retinas, are deaf, and are crippled enough to be incapable of revenge.

I'm not a barbarian, just a human fighter.

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

It's okay. They've all just had their minds warped by bourgeois propaganda.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 29 points 5 months ago

Your #1 challenge and task as a DM is to stay ahead of the players.

Fighting everyone you meet? Guess what you're in a survival adventure now hiding in the hills because the whole king's guard is scouring the hills trying to TPK the party after they killed the shopkeep.

OH I BET YOU'D LIKE TO BE ABLE TO GO TO THE SHOP, WOULD YOU NOT

It's okay, there is an orcish caravan coming through. They want to fight you, but maybe with some skillful rolls you can talk them into doing a little trading through the 1-2 of them that speak common, at least get some food and heal potions and crossbow bolts. You can get kitted out at least well enough to make it a few weeks' journey in any direction and hope the heat dies down before you all get killed.

OH YOU FOUND A DUNGEON ON THE WAY, LET'S DO SOME FUCKIN FIGHTING

WHAT DO YOU MEAN YOU DON'T WANT TO GO IN THE DUNGEON, I THOUGHT YOU LOOOOOVED FIGHTING YOU FUCKIN COMPULSIVE FIGHTING PEOPLE

Guarantee when they get to the next continent for their fresh start (if they make it without the TPK) they will be more amenable to being nice to the NPCs. Or, maybe not, maybe they will have enjoyed the whole process and we get to do the whole thing again, which is also fine and also pretty funny tbh.

[-] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

To be clear, I don't kill anyone. I only beat them until they will never recover enough to seek vengeance.

We can make it funnier. I have a resurrection artifact that is cursed, every time I am killed and get resurrected I age 5 years, but beating a human in unarmed combat makes me one year younger. There is no dying of old age, I keep coming back older. So either I am a feisty frail old man or I end up a kid that people have to kill because I don't stop attacking until my 20s.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 13 points 5 months ago

You shouldn't be trying to kill your players, no. But it's also not your job to keep them alive. That's their business.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Then you have the opposite end of the spectrum where my Wizard and the party Rogue were accidentally competing with each other as to who spoke more languages. My wizard won that battle by hitting 21st level first and taking Polyglot as her first epic feat.

We managed to negotiate a peace treaty with the local orcs, and even got them to send an army to help us deal with a much bigger problem.

[-] xkbx@startrek.website 72 points 5 months ago

Bruh I picked human fighter, not human talker

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 23 points 5 months ago

Still better than a party of 5 wizards all trying to be clever and quirky about any and all details.

[-] shneancy@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

so not a fireball firing squadron?

[-] Speculater@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

"I use a cantrip to cover them in grease then catch it on fire so they keep falling while burning to death."

Eye roll

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Grease isn't a cantrip, and it stops being slippery when ignited. Nice try though, Mr. Clever Wizard Guy.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 5 months ago

The stuff produced by the Grease spell is not specified as flammable.

[-] 5too@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

It's also not specified as not flammable!

(Also, does it still use animal fat or something as a material component? That's why we decided it was)

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

It is specifed as automatic, systematic and hydromatic, though.

[-] RavenFellBlade@startrek.website 5 points 5 months ago

But only when combined with lightning.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 5 months ago

It's a totally fine ruling to say it's flammable. I'm just saying the spell itself doesn't say it is. I think treating it like Alchemist's Fire once ignited is a good house rule. (1d4 damage at the start of each of its turns and can use an action to attempt to extinguish with a DC 10 Dexterity check.)

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 5 months ago

Nothing wrong with that. It doesn't specifically say it isn't. Even if it did house rules are fine so long as everyone at the table enjoys it. I think Grease being flammable is fine. It's a pretty minor change and it is how many people think it acts anyways.

[-] Speculater@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

The way I dealt with it was either it was flammable and the viscosity went down so it wasn't slippery anymore or it was slippery.

this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
647 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

5832 readers
1740 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS