153
submitted 1 year ago by EfreetSK@lemmy.world to c/gaming@beehaw.org
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mint@beehaw.org 106 points 1 year ago

i want shorter games with worse graphics made by people who are paid more to work less and i'm not kidding

[-] storksforlegs@beehaw.org 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Same. Be cool if there was some kind of "ethically made, fair hours and wages for workers" seal of approval for games.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] alwaysconfused@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

After playing Battlefield 3 and feeling an indescribable emptyness for AAA games, I turned to indie developers. The desire for more profits can really suck the uniqueness and character from a game when it's designed for accessibility to as many people as possible.

Bonus points if the game supports modding. It's a great way to extend the life of a game as well. Some of my first online gaming memories are from Quake and it's modding scene. Even Sven Co-op is still developing their mod for Half-Life to this very year.

Games like that seem to have a bit more passion behind it which gives it a bit more charm. It's been a bit sad watching old titles milked dry throughout the years in the name of the mighty dollar. Unfortunately the struggle now is finding those gems in a sea of mediocrity as gaming became more mainstream.

[-] MRPP@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 year ago

I mean, look at Silica and compare it COD or Battlefield. Smaller indie project, supported by a bigger publisher and filled with heart. It looks like a dream game from when I was a kid.

Battlezone meets Starcraft.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] communist@beehaw.org 67 points 1 year ago

This seems like this is going to be heavily counteracted by better engines, and AI generation.

I wonder how it'll play out though.

[-] Skelectus@suppo.fi 34 points 1 year ago

I think so too. The process of content creation will become more efficient. I hope it will allow companies to try new and weird things with less risk.

[-] communist@beehaw.org 25 points 1 year ago

It'll at the very least make indie studios capable of insane things.

[-] Skelectus@suppo.fi 12 points 1 year ago

That also. I've been keeping an eye on this kind of technology for my one person projects.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kushan@beehaw.org 24 points 1 year ago

I think this has always been the case, though. Engines haven't just suddenly got better, they've been getting better and better for decades now. Some of those improvements give you features "out of the box" that you used to have to implement yourself. One of the reasons Unity became so popular with smaller developers is because it lets you focus on building your game - most of the tech is there, you've got an asset store for additional models, plugins, etc. so save you time but ultimately making a (good) game still takes time. Making a game is a very iterative process and a lot of the quality of a game these days is less to do with developing the engine and more to develop the mechanics of the game itself - the way your characters move, the responsiveness of the controls, the UI layout and so on. All of that stuff is hard to be given to you by an Engine, because it's specific to your game.

[-] Kaldo@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Exactly, we've been getting better engines, tools and educated game devs for the past decade too and it's what led to current situation. I don't think AI is going to help with anything, it will just result in more soulless cash grabs if it's used the same way ChatGPT has been lately.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jcg@halubilo.social 29 points 1 year ago

Who is setting this standard? Is the general gaming population really upset if the graphics of the new CoD or sportsgame iteration is not hyperrealistic?z

[-] Lols@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

this, i despise the focus on polygon and texture counts so goddamn much

games from a decade ago are still popular and still look good, can we please just focus on performance and actual mechanics

[-] query@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

And story/worldbuilding.

I don't want a game of a movie of a book, but I like when there are reasons behind the actions and choices.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] communist@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

Eh, I think we're about to hit complete photorealism on those things without it mattering at all anyway

What we really need is easier access to assets.

[-] Master@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

I want more games like valheim. Could care less about the graphic HD quality. Just give me a good game that looks good enough I can forget about my actual life for a while.

[-] academician@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Valheim took 4 years to make.

I work in gamedev. Even with simple graphics, making a successful game generally takes a lot of time to make. It's not just graphics. Design, writing, QA, art, console compliance, and a huge amount of engineering effort especially in multiplayer games. It takes time to get right. And we've all seen what happens when "AAA" games are released before they're ready just because a bean counter said they had to.

The blockbuster hits with simple graphics that a solo dev made in a few months are the exception, not the rule.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mauri9998@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I know, Tears of the Kingdom the most graphically intensive game of all time took 6 years to make. I bet they could have cranked out that bad boy out in like 3 years if they had just used the same graphics as Breath of the Wild

[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

The time sink was probably in prototyping for new ideas to serve as the core of the game, then in generating content that would be considered innovative and fun for people to use that core with. Games are often a moving target where they need to try things that don’t work before finding ideas that will last.

[-] mauri9998@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Meaning that graphics really are not the reason for why games have such long development cycles at all.

[-] Crow@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

They took an entire year for just polishing up the game. I’m sure everything else took great time too lol.

[-] Ralphensnitch@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I suspect a lot of the development time was qa. A game that relies on physics takes a lot of work to get right, and an open world makes it way more open to things that go wrong.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] thegameoverguy@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

I just want to know why everything has to be open world today. It seems like developers are just constantly increasing scope and making games almost too big now.

[-] Lund3@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago

I can assure you it's not the developers changing the scope...

[-] bigpphaver@lemmy.fmhy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Easier level design. I wouldn't be surprised if 99% of open world games just had their landscape generated and then slightly tweaked afterwards.

[-] Lols@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

we all know this is nonsense, right? like, the development cycles have gotten so long because theyve just decided that its better that way

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dinodrinkstea@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago

So they will crunch developers more, pay them less and/or replace some of them with AI crap. That's why i only play indie gamesor put on my skull and crossbones patterned hat

[-] croobat@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

We are getting to a point where development cycles are getting longer than some consoles lifetimes.

[-] Stovetop@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

GTA5 and TES5 were the two most popular games of the PS3/360 generation.

Despite that, there were no new Elder Scrolls or Grand Theft Auto games released for the entire 7 years that the PS4/XB1 generation lasted.

By the time Elder Scrolls 6 is out, baby Dovahkiin will probably be old enough to vote and die for his country.

[-] FantasticFox@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I prefer quality over quantity, especially given the number of studios that are out there.

But if this just means we wait 7 years to get a Redfall, yeah.. no..

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dojan@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Longer game development cycles for big-budget games are here to stay

Good! I’m sick to death of games being announced years before development starts, only for the company to crap out some half assed thing because they ran out of time.

Take the time that’s needed to make a good game.

[-] sourcery@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago

AAA gaming is mostly dead for me outside a few studios that make creative and fun games. I'm so tired of FOTM that are designed to appeal to Twitch streamers. The industry kind of reminds me of superhero movies which will always be able to turn a profit by selling to children. I'd take 60FPS and a low budget fun game over 4K and advanced lighting any day, but I'm not the target audience anymore.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] oryx@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

This isn't really news anymore, and it's not exclusive to Microsoft studios. Many games come to mind, notably GTA/RDR off the top of my head (outside the obvious Bethesda titles, since everyone's more focused on them right now). GTA is also extremely close to the ten year mark between titles; RDR2 was eight years. These big, open world games have constantly been getting larger and taking more time to make for ages now.

[-] Repulsa@lemmy.fmhy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

They get larger, have more features, content and better graphics but they don't seem to be getting any more fun to actually play

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 year ago

Tbf we are already reaching diminishing returns with exponentially increasing the complexity of the game graphics (Polygon count) for some years now. For example, NFS Most Wanted 2012 still looks gorgeous to me to this day.

[-] Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

Style > Graphical fidelity If a game has good style and design, it's amazing how well it can hold up.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] other_world@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

It was over a long time ago for me when I realized that most AAA games were all the same. Might as well wait until they're $20 anyway.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] henry_rowengartner@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I just assumed that AAA are going to be online-only and jammed with macro-transactions.

COUGH Fallout76 COUGH GTA-Online

Cheers -Henry

[-] OdinoThePine@feddit.it 4 points 1 year ago

Yet they're the ones making a new flight simulator while everyone was expecting them to stick to the current one and make it better over time for at least 10 years (as Microsoft said)

[-] aski3252@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah I mean the trend has been obvious for years now, whether you look at GTA or Counterstrike. The times where you released a game, the game was now finished and you move to the next one are long over.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
153 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30428 readers
309 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS