554
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A Black man who says he was elected mayor of a rural Alabama town but has been kept from taking office by White leaders of the town has filed a federal civil rights lawsuit.

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MicroWave@lemmy.world 115 points 1 year ago

Braxton said in the lawsuit, which CBS News reviewed, that Newbern had not held an election "for decades." Instead, "the office of mayor was 'inherited' by a hand-picked successor," and that mayor then chose town council members, again without an election. All prior mayors have been White residents, the lawsuit said, even though about 85% of Newbern's population is Black. Only one Black person has ever served on the town council.

[-] Jackcooper@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago

Inheriting political positions is literally anti-American. We fought a war over this. Fucking Alabama.

[-] ed_cock@kbin.social 35 points 1 year ago

Braxton was allegedly the only person who qualified for the position of mayor, according to the lawsuit. Stokes "did not bother to qualify as a candidate," the lawsuit said, even though he knew Braxton was planning to run. No candidates qualified for town council positions, either.

Braxton was elected mayor by default, making him the first Black mayor of Newbern in the 165 years since the town was founded.

That's an important bit of context, they still didn't have a proper election.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 69 points 1 year ago

They did have a proper election. There was only one candidate, so he won. Then they had a second, improper election where only the previous council was allowed to qualify for office or vote.

[-] ed_cock@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Legally yes, but part of the article makes it sound like there was a regular election between two candidates with everything you expect and the winner is being denied. That's not the case and we don't know how the citizens actually feel about this. It did, after all, take decades for someone to do this.

Not that any of this should have ever happened in the first place, they should have just run the elections normally.

[-] czech@no.faux.moe 24 points 1 year ago

Yes, I'm sure they haven't held an election in 165 years because the 85% black population all agreed it would just be a waste of time. Are you serous?

There actually was a regular election- the incumbents just declined to run a candidate against Braxton. Are you suggesting we should cast doubt on that result until the incumbents agree to qualify a candidate (so, never)?

[-] ed_cock@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, I'm sure they haven't held an election in 165 years because the 85% black population all agreed it would just be a waste of time. Are you serous?

What are you suggesting happened? Nobody seemed to give a shit for decades even though the situation seems clearly in favour of whoever actually decides to go through the official channels. It sounds like everyone has just been completely apathetic to who's running the town, including the 85% black majority.

There actually was a regular election

What I mean by "regular" is the kind of election where people go out to vote for one of two or more candidates. Someone winning by default doesn't say much about what the people want, except that they, once again, don't seem to really care.

[-] czech@no.faux.moe 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What are you suggesting happened?

I'm suggesting that what happened with this election may have happened in the past.

When he approached Stokes for information about running for mayor, Stokes allegedly gave Braxton "wrong information about how to qualify" for the election, and did not provide public notice to residents about the election.

just weeks after his election, Stokes and his council members Gary Broussard, Jesse Donald Leverett, Voncille Brown Thomas and Willie Richard Tucker allegedly "met in secret to adopt a 'special' election ordinance." Notice of the meeting was not published, and the group set a special election for Oct. 6, 2020.

No notice of that election was ever published, according to the lawsuit. Because the election was not publicized, only Stokes and his council members qualified.

you wrote:

It sounds like everyone has just been completely apathetic to who's running the town, including the 85% black majority.

Does it? It actually sounds like a white minority council bends over backwards to keep themselves in power by ignoring opposition and holding private special elections.

What I mean by "regular" is the kind of election where people go out to vote for one of two or more candidates. Someone winning by default doesn't say much about what the people want, except that they, once again, don't seem to really care.

Don't confuse oppression with apathy.

Stokes and his council allegedly changed the locks for a third time, and according to the lawsuit, Braxton and his council have not had "uninterrupted access" to the building since April 2021. This meant that in November 2022, he could not help set up voting machines for Newbern's most recent election.

They will not let them hold elections. Read the article before you "innocently assume" these people "don't seem to really care".

[-] ed_cock@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't see how a small group like that could truly oppress them, especially in an age where everything can easily be documented with video proof and when this case seem clear cut. Someone could have done this ten or twenty years ago. Running a small campaign on the platform of "fuck those racists" should be simple enough in a town with an 85% black majority, but that wasn't even necessary here because that clique's so dumb.

Anyway, I've made my point, you can have the last word.

[-] czech@no.faux.moe 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't see how a small group like that could truly oppress them

That's wild because it's literally explained in the article and then quoted by me here. It's the part of my posts you keep ignoring.

Your questions are not unanswered- the white minority council has evidentially maintained power by ignoring elections and by holding private special elections, like they did in 2020, and by also refusing to allow elections to take place, like they did in 2022.

The only point you've made is that reading the article is not a requirement to comment on it.

[-] jaye@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

More like made an ass out of yourself but sure bud

[-] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I think the whole reason that they didn't field a candidate against Braxton is precisely to get people casting doubt on the a validity of "won by default".

There is a process to hold office, everyone has a pretty good idea of what that means. They can't plead ignorance.

[-] zaph@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

There are a large number of local elections decided because only one person applied for the job and they don't have any issues like this.

[-] ed_cock@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, but in this case a different (much dumber) system had been established for decades without objection it seems. That's different than just having regular, official elections with just one candidate, which is what they should have done in the first place. We don't know who would have won if it was a normal, two-candidate election.

This going to court is a good thing because a) anyone could have filed the paperwork and won by default, including someone who would abuse the position and be really terrible for the town and b) this is certainly the end of the unofficial-official system they've had and might bring bad stuff to light. But keep in mind that the article's coming on very strong because they mostly cite the prosecution.

[-] DeanFogg@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Sounds fucky

[-] vd1n@lemmy.ml 41 points 1 year ago

Small towns suck. Big towns suck. Cities suck. America sucks and it's not coming back.

[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

it's not coming back.

Implying America was ever good at this in the first place.

[-] md5crypto@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I'm still waiting for all the America haters to move to Holland.

[-] SuddenDownpour@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

The only people capable of fundamentally improving one's country are those willing to see what's wrong with it. The very country of the United States was founded by a bunch of people so mad about their country that they literally revolted.

[-] andrewta@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

If this happened in 2021 and 2022 why wait till now to file a federal lawsuit?

[-] Pandantic@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

No one would take his case.

[-] Reliant1087@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Not just that, the first lawyers he approached scammed him I think.

[-] zencat@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

America needs free and reformed education and more psychedelics.

[-] kklusz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Do you see either of those happening anytime soon?

[-] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's a shame, aside from all the racism, Newbern actually seems like a lovely little southern small town.

To clarify, this came in response to looking up Newbern on Google maps and seeing the only photo attached to the town is a group of smiling black women celebrating the 4th of July. If that's the representation of the town, it seems like a nice place.

I probably should have said more specifically 'aside from the racist white minority leadership it seems like it could be a really nice place.' Nice places can have shit leaders. Was happy to see the town hall already has some one star reviews in response to this story. Hopefully more attention will help them toss the bigots to the curb.

I dunno, man. The racism sounds like it’s one of the towns primary characteristics.

[-] Jarmer@slrpnk.net 20 points 1 year ago

Yeah lol. You can’t really “aside from the racism” when that’s their primary focus.

[-] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure the more than %70 black/African American town population might disagree with you. Seems pretty unkind and disingenuous to paint a whole town as a shithole because some assholes are in charge.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It’s a shame, aside from all the racism, Newbern actually seems like a lovely little southern small town.

"Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

[-] XaeroDegreaz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

There's 130 people that live in that town. No one there really gives a flying

[-] md5crypto@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The real story is they don't even have a mayoral position, so a nothing story ginned to stoke hatred toward white people.

[-] SuddenDownpour@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

They do have a mayor position, they just didn't care for it until someone decided to run for it.

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Disagreeing with those specific people for their actions is not the same as hatred for white people. An asshole is an asshole whether they're black, white or green.

[-] shortgiraffe@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Hating racists isn't the same as hating white people.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
554 points (100.0% liked)

News

22852 readers
3144 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS