425
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Vector@lemmy.world 93 points 2 years ago

Standard shitpost and then out of nowhere “Hello inject me with beans please”

WHY IS IT SO FUNNY

[-] wer2@lemm.ee 18 points 2 years ago

I inject myself with beans every morning, usually French press

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 68 points 2 years ago

We're struggling to deal with climate change and these selfish developers can think of nothing except building more factories. This is a global issue, we need a global solution: eschew factories and services for defining everything globally.

[-] cAUzapNEAGLb@lemmy.world 58 points 2 years ago

I fucking hate Spring.

The quickest way to get a team of 10 contractors to turn 100 lines of basic code from a decent engineer into 2k, with 50 janky vulnerable dependencies, that needs to be babied with customized ide's and multi-minute+ build times and 60m long recorded meetings.

Fuck Spring.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 43 points 2 years ago

They can do that in any season

[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Ok, you win! 😁 😂

[-] passepartout@feddit.de 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Wouldn't want to write a webserver / database connection / scheduler / etc. from scratch. Spring Boot plus lombok turns 2k lines of code into 100.

[-] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 22 points 2 years ago

... Looks both ways...

Python does the same in 10 lines of code.

... Ducks under a table to avoid the ensuring flames ...

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

I replaced the P in my LAMP stand with Python and I've never been happier.

[-] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago
[-] VantaBrandon@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

They say he's still ducking to this day

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 15 points 2 years ago

Fuck Spring.

Actually, there's a lot to be said for being able to configure your spleamtomoter without needing to reverse the polarity on the stack cache rotator arm.

I'm kidding.

Fuck Spring.

[-] Pyro@programming.dev 38 points 2 years ago

Hello inject me with beans please

not again

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] steventhedev@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago

XML is the second worst programming language ever created by humans

[-] nxdefiant@startrek.website 31 points 2 years ago

I'm gonna need a bell curve hooded figure meme template of this comment, this is comedy gold.

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Good luck deciding where each opinion goes.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

It's a markup language, not a programming language.

[-] steventhedev@lemmy.world 45 points 2 years ago

Whoosh

Seriously though, spring configurations are written in XML and you create variables, call functions, and have control flow. Effectively turning XML into a horrible twisted shadow of a programming language.

All in the name of "configurability" through dependency injection.

[-] lars@programming.dev 10 points 2 years ago

Spring moved away from XML ages ago. I work on a 6 year old Spring project and it has never had a single line of XML in it.

[-] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 6 points 2 years ago

I'm fond of saying that all great code earns it's right to become good code by starting as trash...

But I still think we should all quietly and politely let Spring die a simple dignified death, as soon as possible.

Out of wildly morbid curiosity, do Maven and Ant still shit all over each other to make sure no one has any real idea what the build inputs and outputs are?

I shouldn't ask things I don't really want to know, though. My inbox is gonna be full of Java apologists.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] JustBrian7872@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Thanks, my works' codebase feels old now.

[-] AMDIsOurLord@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

So if you take XML, pervert it beyond recognition, cut off it's balls and one hand, then it's somehow it's fault that it sucks?

[-] steventhedev@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

They started from XML. There's nowhere to go but up but spring managed to fuck even that up.

FactoryStrategyFactoryFactoryObserverInterface

Friends don't let friends use Java 😜

[-] frezik@midwest.social 12 points 2 years ago

It was a markup language until someone decided to parse and execute it as a programming language. This person should be watched for other deranged behavior.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago
[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 4 points 2 years ago

Yo dawg, I heard you like XML over HTTP so I put XML over HTTP in your XML over HTTP.

load more comments (6 replies)

Why yes, I would like my stack traces to make no ffing sense! I'm so glad you asked.

[-] Mikina@programming.dev 30 points 2 years ago

My favourite take on DI is this set of articles from like 12 years ago, written by a guy who has written the first DI framework for Unity, on which are the currently popular ones, such as Zenject, based on.

The first two articles are pretty basic, explaining his reasoning and why it's such a cool concept and way forward.

Then, there's this update:

Followed by more articles about why he thinks it was a mistake, and he no longer recommends or uses DI in Unity in favor of manual dependency injection. And I kind of agree - his main reasoning is that it's really easy for unnecessary dependencies to sneak up into your code-base, since it's really easy to just write another [Inject] without a second thought and be done with it.

However, with manual dependency injection through constructor parameters, you will take a step back when you're adding 11th parameter to the constructor, and will take a moment to think whether there's really no other better way. Of course, this should not be an relevant issue with experienced programmers, but it's not as inherently obvious you're doing something potentially wrong, when you just add another [Inject], when compared to adding another constructor parameter.

[-] docAvid@midwest.social 5 points 2 years ago

Exactly. Dependency injection is good; if you need a framework to do it, you're probably doing it wrong; if your framework is too magical, you're probably not even doing it at all anymore.

[-] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 23 points 2 years ago

Say what you want about DI frameworks, but if I have to remove another fucking global variable so I can write a test, I'm going to cut a bitch.

[-] cadekat@pawb.social 9 points 2 years ago

Dependency injection is so much worse. Oh, hey, where'd this value come from? Giant blob of opaque reflection code.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

It can be used in bad ways, but if it's used in the right way you should never have the situation you just described.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] aluminium@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Is this even a joke? In Spring DI beans are nothing but glorified over complicated global variables.

Also this fits in here perfectly https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=k0qmkQGqpM8

[-] indog@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago

Spring singleton beans are supposed to be stateless though, so they can't be called variables. Maybe the DI aspect of Spring is less relevant today in the micro service era, but in the day Spring helped make layered monolith apps much cleaner.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] davidgro@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

I think this might be the first of these I've seen where pretty much all the comments are just agreement.

[-] Krakaval@jlai.lu 10 points 2 years ago

Can we talk about annotations which are broken when you upgrade spring boot ? You are asked to upgrade some old application to the newest version of spring boot, application that you discover on the spot, the application does not work anymore after the upgrade, and you have to go through 10 intermediate upgrade guides to discover what could possibly be wrong ?

[-] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago

Spring annotations in general. There's a completely hidden bean context where every annotation seems to throw interceptors, filters, or some reflection crap into. Every stacktrace is 200 lines of garbage, every app somehow needs 500mb for just existing and if you add something with a very narrow scope, that suddenly causes something completely unrelated to stop working.

Realistically, DI and all the Spring crap does not add anything but complexity.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago

Holy shit mood, described to the tee.

An application I've never heard or seen before that needs to be upgraded, and it breaks, so you now need to understand what the hell this application does so you can fix it properly.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Tell me more about these beans

[-] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 8 points 2 years ago

I'll never plaster the back of my car with stickers that all proclaim the same things in ALL CAPS.

But if I was going to...

It would pretty much match this meme.

[-] Solemarc@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

At work we have a lot of old monolithic OOP PHP code. Dependency injection has been the new way to do things since before I started and it's basically never used anywhere.

I assume most people just find it easier to create a new class instance where it's needed.

I've never really seen a case where I think, "dependency injection would be amazing here" I assume there is a case otherwise it wouldn't exist.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago

DI: ☺️

DI frameworks: 😒

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 year ago

I just DI all the time, it's called a constructor.

[-] Lmaydev@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

I love dependency injection personally.

I managed to completely change how YARP routed requests by registering a single interface.

The flexibility it provides is awesome. And it makes testing so much easier.

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 6 points 2 years ago

Urgh. I just sicked in my mouth.

Die in a hole DI frameworks.

I already have an injection 'framework' it's called a constructor. I already have a factory it's called new

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
425 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

27048 readers
338 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS