161

Kristi Noem doubles down on dog-killing to win over MAGA — here's why her story is backfiring (www.salon.com)

submitted 6 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

South Dakota's governor gets the sadism of Trump supporters, but screws up by saying the quiet parts out loud

Squint hard enough and perhaps one can see how Gov. Kristi Noem, R-S.D., thought it was a winning political move to brag about murdering a puppy. It's the same trolling strategy used by MAGA Republicans like Donald Trump, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas: Say something extremely evil, stupid, or both. Draw the inevitable liberal outrage or mockery. Play the victim, claiming that it's more proof the "elites" hate the common sense working folk of MAGA. Then sit back and watch the dollars and followers roll in.

For Noem, however, her tale of shooting her dog Cricket is not working out quite as planned. Sure, she got the predictable outrage and disgust from Democrats. But she also seems to have alienated the very Trump supporters she was trying to impress with her bloodthirsty tale. Fox News let their displeasure be known by doing a round-up story of conservative social media influencers denouncing Noem, often with quite harsh language. "Did she just intentionally end her career?" asked trollish podcaster Tim Poole. Other high-profile right-wingers blasted Noem as an "Absolute Psycho" and called for her to be "criminally charged for animal abuse." Even the notorious right-wing troll Catturd — who has 2.4 million Twitter followers because he acts as vile as his name suggests — drew a line at killing your child's beloved pet.

Noem, however, still seems to think she can win over Republican voters by doubling and tripling down on her tale of executing a 14-month-old Wirehaired Pointer because it got confused and killed some chickens, instead of the pheasants she was training it to hunt. On Friday, she bragged about "the media gasping" at her "politically INcorrect" dog murder while hawking her new book. By Sunday she seemed to grasp that even Republicans were grossed out. She released a longer statement, trying to recast her choice as "hard and painful," claiming, "I have never passed on my responsibilities to anyone else to handle."

top 27 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] hrimfaxi_work@midwest.social 111 points 6 months ago

I'm pleased that she's experiencing the fallout from all this, but whatever logic she used to calculate that political risk is baffling.

Four John Wick movies have grossed over a billion dollars on the conceit that harming a dog is a legitimate emotional catalyst for someone to kill 450 people.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 19 points 6 months ago

Apparently the story was known locally in south dakota political circles, so there is conjecture this is her trying to get out ahead of it if she was nominated.

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The initial story in her book was made largely without political calculus. The current political calculus of doubling down is simply that apologies are for pussies and pussies are liberals and I ain't no fucking liberal. That's it.

[-] somas@kbin.social 5 points 6 months ago

@hrimfaxi_work

For all we know people in GOP-world think Wick is the villain in the series

[-] kava@lemmy.world 62 points 6 months ago

Americans love dogs. Even the brainwashed MAGA loonies. I can't believe she is a successful politician and thought this would be an OK thing to include in a book.

Usually psychos who make it into power understand the public sentiment enough to hide certain things like this.

Maybe it was a calculated risk- an attempt at courting controversy like Trump does and just dramatically backfired.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 49 points 6 months ago

The story that is emerging is that she killed the puppy in a fit of rage and this would inevitably come out because there were witnesses, so this is damage control and an attempt to reframe her rage as a difficult but necessary decision.

[-] kava@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago

That makes sense. I did figure the story she's telling is probably not the whole truth. When we tell a story about ourselves, we tend to consciously or subconsciously manipulate it so that it looks better.

So this story already makes her look really bad. The truth is probably even worse. Like you mentioned.

[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 14 points 6 months ago

Usually editors tell authors they are about to fuck up this badly. Or a publisher won't let it get published with outright horror in it. Like what publisher wants to be associated with printing the autobiography for Puppy-Killer Governor?

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Was it Regnery Publishing?

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago

Americans love dogs. Even the brainwashed MAGA loonies.

I am looking forward to seeing how this plays out. Trump is probably smart enough to stay away from her now. But if not, it would make MAGAts choose between their cult worship of Trump and literally killing puppies. I'm sure they'd find a way to justify it.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

Puppy Breaks Into Kristi Noem’s Official Residence and Craps on Rug APR 29

PIERRE, SOUTH DAKOTA (The Borowitz Report)—In an incident under investigation by state police, a puppy of indeterminate breed obtained access to Gov. Kristi Noem’s official residence Sunday night and excreted on the entryway carpet. A police spokesman said that the act of canine vandalism is believed to be “political in nature.” At a hastily called press conference, a visibly rattled Noem called the puppy’s actions “a result of Joe Biden’s failed policies at the border.” Bad puppies are swarming into our country, breaking into our homes, and committing unspeakable crimes,” she said. But, in a worrisome development for Noem, a new poll shows South Dakota’s voters favoring the puppy over her by a two-to-one margin.

[-] SteefLem@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Wait a minute… she shoot her puppy because of bidens failed border policy thats her excuse??? Fucking hell that cunt is…well a cunt

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

Uhh... It's a joke article.

[-] Cosmos7349@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Wait... ARE YOU SAYING SHE SHOT HER PUPPY BECAUSE OF FAILED BORDER POLICY???

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

I'm saying it's all left wing lies and biden personally shot her puppy.

[-] Cosmos7349@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Oshit that's crazy thanks for the info

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Sounds like she watched House of Cards but wasn't smart enough to know why Frank Underwood is the bad guy.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 5 points 6 months ago

You’re looking at Frank Underwood the wrong way. He was the successful guy.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

For a little while, sure.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 1 points 6 months ago

It's a TV show, the bad guy has to lose, or at least be well on the way to losing.

When it's not a TV show, the bad guy often just wins, even if everybody knows about all the criming.

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

what a ridiculous person

[-] numbermess@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

I suppose we'll be seeing the people who will inevitably excuse and then endorse her behavior start impaling their puppies on spikes in the front yard just so they can also be "telling it like it is."

I predict that Rosanne Barr will appear on television with her face smeared in fresh dog blood and wearing a necklace of tiny skulls before the end of this year, sneering into the camera "oh are you TRIGGERED lmao???"

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

What a monster.

[-] somas@kbin.social 5 points 6 months ago

@MicroWave

I’ve visited South Dakota many times and everyone here is being really judgy.

We can’t judge South Dakotans by the standards of more civilized society. They don’t know any better over there.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

I lived for a short period of time in South Dakota and was instantly shocked by just how closed minded people there were. They really existed in a separate world from everyone else.

[-] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 9 points 6 months ago

I have family in SD and ND and live in southern MN. That’s just the current rural mentality in the Midwest unfortunately. And SD and ND are 99% rural.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

But it was like…there are no fireflies where I come from but I’m obviously a complete and utterly worthless person for asking someone what that light was. Like needlessly caustic.

this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024

161 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19096 readers

2844 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News