125
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by twotone@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

I have been using the Mi Band for years which I generally like, although it's quite a simple device

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] x2XS2L0U@feddit.de 24 points 1 year ago

I only use devices supported by gadgetbridge. This way I can track me without giving all the data to somebody else. Currently I use a Mi Band 7, but I'm thinking about getting a device with onboeard GPS.

[-] twotone@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago

Never heard of gadgetbridge. Excited to switch over

[-] beetelier@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

How is gadgetbridge working with the 7? The wikipage has a long list of unsupported features, which has held me back from trying it out, but I really want to give it a go!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] owf@feddit.de 22 points 1 year ago

Apple Watch.

I had a couple of Garmins before and the difference is night and day. The Apple Watch isn't perfect, but it's clear that a lot of thought went into it.

The Garmins on the other hand, were lowest of low effort.

They blatantly didn't talk to even a single cyclists while building their cycling app.

Cyclists use average speed, not pace. Even the junkiest $3 cycle computer from Ali Baba gets this right, but not Garmin. They just copy-pasted the running screen.

[-] supercheesecake@aussie.zone 45 points 1 year ago

This is a troll comment.

Let’s review: has “had a couple of Garmins”, but doesn’t know that both speed and lap speed are default data fields in the bike activity. And can be trivially changed to average speed or essentially a bazillion other types of data (HR, power etc) in a highly customisable way.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jabib@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure my Garmin does pace for cycling. You bed to get a multisport watch from them first. The Forerunner watches are going to be focused on running obviously. Fenix line should do average speed

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] jdf038@mander.xyz 16 points 1 year ago
[-] twotone@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

This author has done a few of these tests and Garmin seems to be most accurate. I'm mostly not a fan of the intense styling though

[-] supercheesecake@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago

Well there’s lots of different sizes and a few styles. But all good. Different strokes …

[-] sat012e@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Check out the Vivoactive and Venu lines. Those are nice and don't look like the $40 Timex Ironmans.

[-] MattMist@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

I'm currently using a Mi Band 6 (with a nylon strap that's real comfy), but I wish the Pebble still existed. The e-paper display, the nice UI and tactile buttons, with good battery life and the ability to make apps was great.

Once my Mi Band breaks, I'm torn between Garmin (since they check almost all of the Pebble boxes, even if I don't do fitness and they're more fitness oriented) and a Galaxy Watch with the rotating bezel, since that was really cool to play with, plus the Android integration might be nicer.

[-] bananahammock@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

I have no idea why no other company has been able to recapture the magic of pebble. It was by far the best smartwatch I've ever owned.

[-] snowbell@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

There is watchy, pretty sure it is from the same guy who made the pebble.

[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

It's no Pebble, but I chose the BangleJS 2 for its openness and the ability to load and even make apps myself.

[-] ComradeDaisy 14 points 1 year ago

I still love my Pebble smartwatches, and of them I prefer the Pebble Time Steel. It still lasts like at least a week on a single charge.

[-] chahk@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Where's the "none of the above" choice? Aside from keeping the time, all I want from a smartwatch is the ability to see its screen both in the dark and under direct sunlight, a week-long battery life, 5ATM water resistance rating, receiving notifications from my phone (with the ability to dismiss them), ability to have customizable watch faces, and finally the ability to accept standard size watch bands. The last watch I've owned that could do almost all of that (aside from standard bands or ) was Pebble Steel. I still miss it to this day.

Everything else was an overpriced disappointment. I don't need it to monitor my heart rate, or my blood oxygen level, or my blood alcohol level. I don't want it to prod me or give me pep talks, or make phone calls, or play music, since my phone can do all of that better.

[-] GetOn@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

I've had this for 4.5 years and it is amazing. Does everything you want.

https://www.garmin.com/en-CA/p/621802/pn/010-02064-00

[-] sat012e@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Double plus for the Garmin. I'm wearing an Instinct 2 right now. 21 day battery life! It replaced my Vivoactive 4S (6 day battery life) and was cheaper than the Venu 2 (11 day battery life).

I've killed at least two smartwatches by forgetting I'm wearing them when I go in the ocean. The Vivoactive 4S was completely unaffected by the salt water, and I'll test the Instinct 2 this week.

My mom is all about her Apple watch, and has touted the features to me. "I can [insert feature] with this!" Have you used it for that? "No."

I've had three Pebbles, a couple Fitbits, a couple Garmins, a couple Android watches, two Amazfits... I just want something that sends me notifications and has good battery life. If I have to charge the watch every night, I'll forget I'm wearing it.

That being said, the Instinct 2 is actually worse at tracking my workouts than the Vivoactive 4 was. I do martial arts, so the GPS is actually a hindrance there, and I haven't found a way to make it move "generic cardio" to the top of the workout list.

[-] davehtaylor@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

I miss Pebble so much.

Everything else was an overpriced disappointment. I don’t need it to monitor my heart rate, or my blood oxygen level, or my blood alcohol level. I don’t want it to prod me or give me pep talks, or make phone calls, or play music, since my phone can do all of that better.

That's the thing. I have an apple watch, and apps on it are complete garbage. They're not useful, they UI is impossible, browsing for apps to launch them is tedious and painful. Like, I don't want to order Taco Bell on my watch. I don't want to play a game. I need notifications, time/date/weather, and easy playback controls for whatever is currently playing on my phone and that's it.

I also generally don't trust fitness trackers. If you have a watch that can use GPS to track a run or a ride, then that's fine. But pedometers are a joke, and counting calories burned is most assuredly bullshit since the human body isn't a closed system and everyone's metabolism is different

[-] dnzm@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago

Not sure about the water-proof-ness, but actually a pinetime might tick most of those boxes. I'm happy with mine.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Where's the "none of the above" choice?

I agree with that preference

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bbbhltz@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago

TL;DR The author determined the most accurate are the Garmin Epix Pro and the Fitbit Inspire 3

I have a PineTime which I think is pretty good for what it is. In fact, I am very happy with it and recommend wholeheartedly the device.

Still, my favourite is even more basic. I have a standalone pedometer. This one, which has a website tha belies the product's quality. I find it very accurate. It does some basic calorie calculations for you, and distance. And the battery lasts...ages.

[-] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago

Man, I loved my Fitbit One, but damn was it so fickle. So easy to lose and not waterproof, and spotty bluetooth. It was just a basic pedometer with calorie calculations.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] fox@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago

Still use my Pebble 2 SE and my Pebble Time. Still bummed they never came out with the Time 2.

[-] EmilyIsTrans 8 points 1 year ago

My preferred one is Withings one's. They're hybrid watches which means they largely have a regular watch face with a little screen and a heart rate sensor/gyroscope. Best of both worlds in my opinion.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] irasponsible@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

I have a Garmin Vivosmart 4; does all the things I need it to do, and isn't big or distracting. All I wanted was a step tracker and the ability to set multiple alarms.

[-] Semmelstulle@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

For me it's the Apple Watch because I can write apps for it

[-] cinaed666@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Garmin Forerunner 55.
It's the most basic one in the running series, but it works well enough for what I need it to do.
It's the first real "closed ecosystem" device I own, as usually I go the open source route for everything, but Garmin has a good track record and the device has helped me train for a half marathon really well. I put a "casio"-style watch face on it, and I enjoy it a lot.

[-] rhys@mastodon.rhys.wtf 9 points 1 year ago

@cinaed666 @twotone I also have the Forerunner 55.

Something to note is that Garmin watches are Linux-friendly and can be used without signing up to their cloud services. You can access the watch as a USB storage device and manually grab the .FIT files on it, which you can then import into tools of your choice (or convert to .GPX for wider compatibility).

[-] martinb@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

Very good to know, thanks!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 6 points 1 year ago

I have a Garmin Instinct 2S. Works really well for me, it has all the smart watch functions I need and great battery life. It's also quite rugged. The stats are a good motivation to get me out cycling more often.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cnnrduncan@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Been wearing a pinetime pretty much constantly since the start of the year, it only tracks walking though afaik but luckily that's my main source of exercise (and way of getting around the city)!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] crow@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Apple Watch. But I recognize there are better options now, just not for iPhone.

[-] AttackBunny@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Yup. Apple Watch for me. It works mostly seamlessly with the rest of my Apple stuff. I don’t think any others do.

[-] bastrah@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Galaxy Watch 4. I don't like Samsung but I wanted WearOS 3 so yeah...

[-] MangoPenguin 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I like the garmin venu 2 that I bought used, it's been very reliable. I pretty much forget about it since it just works with minimal fuss. Battery lasts 2 weeks too which is nice.

I remember researching fitbit and it just seemed like more hassle, and some features were locked behind subscriptions and stuff like that.

[-] account_93@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

My previous one was a Withings Steel HR, Fantastic smart watch, did the basics but it's main draw for me was it's analog watch face. Approx 1 month battery life. The smart stuff was shown in a small screen behind it. Ultimately I stopped using it due to age, always losing Bluetooth connection so notifications were unreliable.

My current watch is an Amazfit GTR Mini, Fully touchscreen, Again does basics and few more extras. Battery life is about 10-14days. Nothing to complain about so far.

[-] twotone@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

I've always wanted one of those. They're gorgeous and remind me of my Skagen watch's styling. Also appreciate the long battery life

[-] Lionir@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

I just have some cheap fitbit. I just care about the sleep metrics and battery life.

[-] TheFermentalist@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I have Withings Scanwatch Horizon. I love the look and the battery life. I average 22 days between recharging. Steps are reasonably accurate, it measures a bit on the low side but this means I do another few hundred steps occasionally to meet my goal. The app is pretty good. I use it to track walks and gym sessions mainly.

[-] realitista@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Love mine too. Looks like a normal watch. Has all the features I need, and doesn't require constant charging.

[-] gortbrown@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

For something with fitness tracking, I've been using the Garmin Forerunner series for years. Recently though, I've been using the Pine64 PineTime as my main smartwatch. It doesn't have much for fitness tracking, but if you're looking for a basic smartwatch it's pretty nice!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
125 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37750 readers
207 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS