Deconstructing the spectacle and stagecraft of a Donald Trump rally (www.reuters.com)

submitted 5 months ago by ptz@dubvee.org to c/politics@lemmy.world

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Campaign rallies are a defining feature of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump’s third run for the White House: all-day spectacles blending evangelical revivalist meeting and carnival, designed to deliver an emotional experience to his base.

all 16 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 26 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Even if you don't read the article, the pictures from the rally are pretty much exactly as you would expect. I've also had fever dreams that were less animated than some of these attendees.

Sharon Anderson logged more than 13 hours on the road and spent the night in her rental car to gain a front row position. It was her 51st Trump rally. REUTERS/Brian Snyder

[-] Dramaking37@lemmy.world 34 points 5 months ago

Just living her best life spending her social security check to follow a snake oil salesman around the country. All while living off of gallon containers of potato salad. My god Fox News did a number on this country.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

The wretched dolt won't have to worry about spending her Social Security check once the orange mobster becomes dictator -he will end SSI because he will have no need for her dollars when he can tap the treasury.

[-] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Living off social security while railing against 'socialism'

Literally the first word out of two of the name of the program - and still a hard disconnect

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago

"Midjourney, draw me a photorealistic image of white grievance."

[-] vegeta@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Stop calling them rallies, they are religious congregations

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 22 points 5 months ago

They are rallies like the nazi rallies, promoting hate and worship of a belligerent authoritarian who feeds into their fears.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

That ended well.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

In Trump’s third presidential campaign...

The third? So that would be, what, his 2012 or 2016 run? Because has been running or talking about running since the 1980s.

Reuters attended Trump’s Green Bay rally on April 2 and interviewed four dozen attendees who collectively liked going to the rallies, they said, because it felt like a community and they didn’t have to worry about being politically correct.

They mean that that they like it because they can use racial slurs without getting picked on for it.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 6 points 5 months ago

The third? So that would be, what, his 2012 or 2016 run?

That's the three they mean, right?

2016: Run #1
2020: Run #2
2024: Run #3

Or am I just celebrating too hard, too early today? 😆

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

He ran at least once before 2016. He's been Putin's useful idiot for at least 4 decades.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 months ago

Ok yes he did technically run in 2 states in 2000, for 2 months:

In 2000, Trump ran in the California and Michigan primaries for nomination as the Reform Party candidate for the 2000 presidential election but withdrew from the race in February 2000. A July 1999 poll matching him against likely Republican nominee George W. Bush and likely Democratic nominee Al Goreshowed Trump with seven percent support.

But in 2011 he just talked about it without ever doing it:

In 2011, Trump speculated about running against President Barack Obama in the 2012 election, making his first speaking appearance at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in February 2011 and giving speeches in early primary states. In May 2011, he announced he would not run. Trump's presidential ambitions were generally not taken seriously at the time.

[-] _t_o_@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

I’ll just leave this hear…

The Battle for Your Mind by Dick Sutphen Persuasion & Brainwashing Techniques Being Used On The Public Today

[-] Today@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I would kind of like to go to one just to see it and take photos. Would you feel more sorrow, anger or confusion?

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 6 points 5 months ago

Probably a similar feeling of curiosity like when I visit a zoo. Except it would be a slightly morbid curiosity since these are people, and their vote counts the same as mine.

this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024

65 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18883 readers

3095 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News