473
submitted 6 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 163 points 6 months ago

Weird... why is nobody commenting about how both parties are the same?

[-] Gormadt 104 points 6 months ago

Oh that's easy, because this doesn't play into their narrative

Their goal is to stop people from voting this year so that the fascist can win

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 83 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It’s 1AM in Russia right now. Wait until morning.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 4 points 6 months ago

Don't disrespect the CCP posting.

[-] AuroraZzz@lemmy.world 39 points 6 months ago

Lol. Right? It looks like the bots haven't gotten to this one yet

[-] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 10 points 6 months ago

The other party loudly proclaimed they don’t want this afaik so… or atleast associate themselves with that idea based on who they elect.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Out the gate early with the "all criticism of the party means that the critic is saying both parties are the same" canard.

My only criticism of Biden on this is that he's had the power to do this all along and is only getting around to it now. Democratic legislators had the power to do more back when they had a majority, but they refuse to wield power when we hand it to them.

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago

almost like they're more okay with fascism than progress?

[-] Whattrees 9 points 6 months ago

Almost like the Dept of Ed has been working on these rules for years and the process takes some time and has to be open to public comments and things. The wheels of the government are designed to move slowly. We can discuss if that's good or not, but this isn't something Biden decided last week, it's been in the works for a long time.

And it's almost politics, especially on the left, is more complicated than one party having the slimmest of possible margins. Did you forget about Sinema and Manchen? Have you already forgotten the fights the Dems in Congress had within the party to get enough support to pass things? If you want more progressive polices to pass than you need to elect even more Dems into Congress so that the few fuckwits in the "center-right" can be relegated to the corner and ignored. That doesn't work when nothing can pass if even one senator decides to vote no.

Jesus fucking Christ I swear we need to mandate more than one part of one class for how the government works. So many of you out here acting like the moment a Dem becomes president they can just will whatever laws they want into existence.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago

maybe if this wasnt a fucking election stunt, wecd care more. I don't expect this to be enforced.

[-] Whattrees 40 points 6 months ago

Biden does a bad thing: See? He's just like Trump!

Biden does a moderate thing: See? He's not as left as he should be!

Biden does a good thing early in his term: See? He's not doing enough yet!

Biden does a good thing halfway into his term: See? It's just to help the Dems in the midterm!

Biden does a good thing late in his term: See? He's just trying to appease the people who might vote for him!

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago

but he's not stopping he genocide.

if he protected trans rights and stopped the genocide, sure. I might consider it. too little too late, dude.

[-] Whattrees 21 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

See? He's just like Trump! And he's not doing enough! And the things he has done are only to help secure votes!

Edit to add: Also, my dude, did you forget which post this is on? He's literally protecting trans people with this move but it's still not enough. Fact is you wouldn't support him even if he led the revolution himself. He's not perfect, but he's done more to clean up Trump's mess and help marginalized people than any president in history.

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

the problem with that is I expect it to revert the day after the election, or at least not be maintained.

[-] Whattrees 7 points 6 months ago

Sorry, you expect Biden to undo it if he is elected? Or do you just mean that it will be removed if Trump wins. Of course if Trump wins he'll undo whatever of Biden's work he can. I don't have any reason at all to think Biden would remove it after the election if he won. Why wouldn't he maintain it?

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Yeah, it's good, for now. Vote to keep it that way.

And cross your fingers that Thomas has a heart attack soon.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Which party is speaking out against it? And which party has 99% supporting it?

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

neither party is speaking out against it. neither party has stopped funding them.

empty words are empty.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

points to all the democrats speaking out against it

I can’t tell if you’re a troll or you just don’t read political news. If it’s an innocent mistake, that’s one thing…

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago

if i had a nickel for everytime i heard someone say "both parties are the same" i'd have a few dollars, which isn't much, but it's weird that i'd have a few dollars.

If i had a nickel for everytime i heard someone reference "both parties are the same" I'd have a lot more than a few dollars, and i'm not sure why. And honestly, it kind of scares me.

[-] andros_rex@lemmy.world 63 points 6 months ago

I wonder if that’ll make it legal for me to piss in the men’s bathroom again/have a job in the career I love and went thousands in debt to train for… only mentions students and they tend to forget that trans adults exist…

Oklahoma state law says it’s a misdemeanor and schools can lose up to 10% of their funding for letting anyone (teacher or student) use a bathroom that doesn’t match their birth certificate. (There’s been a standing executive order since 2015 that birth certificates cannot be changed). I have the face and body of a reddit neckbeard, but I was violating the law by not pissing in the same room as my female colleagues and students.

Just kinda messes with your head when you have to commit 1-3 crimes a day at work.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

I thought Title IX was about students though?

[-] cannibalkitteh 17 points 6 months ago

It applies generally to anyone involved in a program receiving federal funding.

[-] andros_rex@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Yeah - that’s what I wondering. The law in Oklahoma says anyone in a public school. Our state department of education is controlled by Ryan Walters and LibsOfTikTok, so it’ll be interesting to see how they try to fight this.

[-] bbuez@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Shit I missed that one!

Over the weekend, software developer Travis Brown revealed that the Twitter account used for Libs of Tik Tok had used the screen name @/chayaraichik until late February 2021, and that the same name is the one on the Libs of Tik Tok's domain registration.

newsweek

At the very least these morons don't seem to have a care for opsec, not that I think it will come to matter :/. Just imagine the shitstorm con-types would have given some Democrat having a secret targetted harassment campaign.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago

hee hee, whoops, don't tell that group of furry hackers that's been making rounds recently about this one.

[-] HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Just kinda messes with your head when you have to commit 1-3 crimes a day at work.

Those are rookie numbers!

...drink more water dude

[-] andros_rex@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Part of teaching is peeing strategically - you have to plan your water drinking so that you only need to go during lunch or plan. (The worst is when they make you “cover” during your planning period - usually I could get away with sitting behind the desk and doing a subtle pee dance all hour)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 6 months ago

Lawsuit from Florida in 3... 2... 1...

[-] ChokingHazard63@sh.itjust.works 27 points 6 months ago

Finally some good news for once

[-] bouldering_barista@lemmy.world 27 points 6 months ago

This is good news! Trans students will just be using the bathroom, cisgender students are the ones that may be abusing this with negative intentions.

Stay kind, everyone!

[-] aquielias@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

taking one side of the population rights to give it to another part of the population how is this progress?

[-] tiefling 73 points 6 months ago

Who the fuck is losing rights over this

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 34 points 6 months ago

I'm taking everyone's gender

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 months ago

You're going to be omnigender - specifically every gender that has ever gendered all at once?

Impressive.

[-] atomicorange@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Finally! I’m freeeeeeee!

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 3 points 6 months ago

GIVE MINE BACK

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] stoly@lemmy.world 44 points 6 months ago

lol you’re so accustomed to be able to oppress that you literally think you’re being oppressed if you can’t oppress

[-] Drusas@kbin.run 44 points 6 months ago

This doesn't take anyone's rights away.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 42 points 6 months ago

Granting rights to one group doesn't automatically remove rights from another.

See gay marriage. Allowing one group of people to have the full rights of marriage doesn't block those same rights from anyone else.

All it means is everyone deserves to be treated like human beings.

[-] HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Granting rights to one group doesn't automatically remove rights from another.

It does when you're a rigid hierarchy lover who believes everything is zero sum

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 33 points 6 months ago

What the fuck are you talking about?

[-] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 28 points 6 months ago

“When you're accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression.”

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago

Jesse what the fuck are you talking about

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago

ah damn, my rights to not go into the bathroom i please. oh no. I'm losing them.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
473 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3454 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS