223
submitted 7 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Netflix says its profits have soared in the first three months of this year, partly thanks to a crackdown on password sharing.

The streaming giant said it added 9.3 million customers in the first quarter, bringing its total number of subscribers to almost 270 million.

The company also said its profits in the first quarter jumped to more than $2.3bn (£1.85bn).

But the firm will stop reporting key subscriber numbers from next year.

Some investors saw its unexpected decision to stop reporting subscriber numbers as a sign that Netflix's wave of customer growth may be coming to an end.

Simon Gallagher, a former Netflix director and now principal of entertainment investment firm SPG Global, told the BBC's Today programme that while the numbers indicated a "very, very strong performance" this might not last.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 128 points 7 months ago

Be sure to read the article. Netflix has announced they won’t be disclosing subscriber numbers from here on out. Probably not a good sign.

[-] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 112 points 7 months ago

Keep wringing out that sponge for money, it definitely won't rip or tear at some point.

[-] comrade19@lemmy.world 49 points 7 months ago

I heard investors need stocks to forever go up and for that to happen companies need to keep doing things like this. They cant just leave things as they are or something

[-] Mikina@programming.dev 33 points 7 months ago

Not only investors. Everyone needs stocks to forever go up. We're kind of fucked, because once it becomes apparent that the infinite market growth isn't possible and we reach a theoretical ceiling of stock market, the world and economy will probably be in serious shit.

I've tried looking for some articles or papers about what would actually happen and couldn't find any, but our society right now is kind of based on that premise, and once it stops it's going to be a problem. Mostly for the ordinary people, though. And of course, caused entirely by the greedy investors struggling to figure out how to keep milking the cow. Fuck capitalism.

[-] yo_scottie_oh@lemmy.ml 10 points 7 months ago

Can confirm, am investor, need stonks to go up.

[-] Lukewarm_Tea@lemm.ee 11 points 7 months ago

I am also an investor. If the socks don’t go up I get a rash, shortness of breath and this feeling of inescapable doom. So unless you want to be a murderer I suggest you help me keep the stonks going up.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

What? There aren't an infinite number of potential new users to sign up?

[-] Lukewarm_Tea@lemm.ee 15 points 7 months ago

One day the companies will figure out how to charge infinite money for no product or service. Then capitalism will be satisfied and the game will be won.

[-] Gork@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago

I thought this might be the case for insurance companies once self driving cars displace manually driven cars entirely.

Collect all the premiums, pay out very rarely since these systems have the potential to be a lot safer in general than human drivers. Possibly with the exception of Tesla since Musk's decision to not have Lidar severely constrains their system's ability to function properly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JiveTurkey@lemmy.world 64 points 7 months ago

I canceled my Netflix because of this and I don't even share my password. Also because they fucked up the witcher.

[-] UckyBon@lemmy.world 29 points 7 months ago

I cancelled all my streaming accounts because of this. I never shared the password other than with my SO. It was a wake up call to the whole subscriptions scam. It's a shitty middleman.

Subscriptions add up real quick: movies, music, games, apps, cloud, news, etc. Let alone having some other hobbies.

I have friends who drop $200 per month on those things. Absolutely insane. That's a month worth of avocado toast.

[-] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

My ex has hundreds of dollars of subscription stuff each month: Disney, Netflix, Hulu, Amazon Streaming, Max/HBO, OnlyFans, Tinder, Field, Bumble etc etc. It's so stupid

[-] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago
[-] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

We were poly, I have my own OF, it's no big deal except those subscriptions add up fast. Just like the dating apps were okay at the time too, but an annoying cost when added up.

[-] tiefling 5 points 7 months ago

Same, I immediately canceled my account. They spent the next year trying to get me to resub. Fuck Netflix, yarg

[-] shadowSprite@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Same on both counts

[-] msage@programming.dev 3 points 7 months ago

I didn't really like the book (somebody handed me one, can't remember which), haven't played the games, so I went almost blind to the show.

And I mean it honestly, it was fun. Batshit crazy, and the third season went even more nuts, but it was just fun, I really enjoyed myself.

[-] evatronic@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago

Just about any adaptation from book to TV is going to piss off book readers because they "ruined" it.

Myself, if I wanted to experience the exact same thing if read, I would read it again. Putting it on screen means something new.

[-] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 61 points 7 months ago

I unsubscribed when I first heard of it. Haven't missed it.

[-] wheelie@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago

Same. A lot of it was low quality.

[-] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

There was a time when Netflix had some really weird indie shit and I loved that. Last I used it they basically produced their own butchered versions of other material, like the Witcher. I unsubscribed after the first season.

[-] nadram@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

Unsubscribed just because they pulled this move. None of the 3 people i was sharing it with ended up subscribing.

[-] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 28 points 7 months ago

Ladies and gentlemen,

We have failed. We need to be better consumers, and do something about when businesses pull tricks like this. But we have failed to appropriately respond, and we will be paying a big price for this.

Now, every single subscription business and their mother will be cracking down on password sharing. It'll be seen as guaranteed profit at the expense of our wallets and freedoms, and quickly ingrained into society.

[-] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 14 points 7 months ago

Do what though? We can either unsubscribe, or subscribe. This is not a social service by them, nor is a gun being put to our heads to use Netflix. I really don't mean to defend them, I prefer the high seas myself, but I genuinely feel there's nothing we can or should do except either agree or disagree with them about subscribing to their plans.

[-] Silentiea 7 points 7 months ago

My response to being told Netflix would stop my password sharing was to cancel my sub. And now, months later, I'm using someone else's password to keep watching their shows...

[-] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 months ago

This is where the problem lies: We have pathetically little power over the situation. I try to do my best to avoid paying companies that abuse their paying customers and let others know about it.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

This is where the problem lies: We have pathetically little power over the situation.

Collectively, we do. We just never do collectively.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 27 points 7 months ago

Nah bruv I’ll continue sailing.

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago

But what will they do next time they need to make line go up? I know! Increase prices again!

[-] darkpanda@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 months ago

Probably layoffs.

[-] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I'd pay slightly more than their current rate if they could get me much higher bitrate streaming. I can't pay more for the same, though, and I fear that's the tack they will take.

[-] oxjox@lemmy.ml 21 points 7 months ago

LOL I was in arguments with a number of angry internet people who were vehemently screaming how this would be the death of Netflix. They seriously thought that all the people who were getting free passwords would simply not subscribe to Netflix. To which I responded, then they wouldn't lose a single subscriber. And then I saw more than a few people actually say that subscribers who were sharing their passwords would stop subscribing to Netflix because they weren't able to share their passwords. Just an example of how your personal feelings about something can skew your observance of a reality.

Now, why people are choosing to subscribe to Netflix at all is something I genuinely don't understand. I'll pay for a month of it every 12-18 months and get bored searching for something to watch within a couple days.

I'm interested to see how the younger TikTok generation transitions to commercial programming. I would think some portion of the demographic isn't going to want to sit own for 30-90 minutes to watch wide-screen television. Just as we transition from over-the-air to cable to streaming, I wonder what will come next. "TikFlix"?

[-] KingBoo@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

"TikFlix"?

We're actually there. Go on YouTube and you'll see entire movies condensed into tokable sized chunks. This is how Z watches movies now, and it will only get worse.

Songs are becoming shorter and shorter, to hopefully create a tiktok trend.

[-] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Most modern movies are pointless fluff anyway. I don't need to watch 20minutes of fighting and explosions, I really don't. Or even more stereotypical, boring one liners, jokes, and banter. Not to mention the movies with the exact same emotional motivations - the superhero movies. Miss me with the war propaganda and reactionary bullshit. And that's what most movies are about these days. Internet is killing Hollywood because Hollywood has always been fluff and not that good.

This sounds like satire but I don't really want to know

[-] blargerer@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago

I used to subscribe inconsistently when there was something I wanted to watch. Then I started sharing with my family so I kept the subscription up at a higher price constantly because I didn't know when they were using it or not. I've since gone back to only subscribing at a lower price when I want to watch something. I honestly thought way more people would be in this situation.

[-] oxjox@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago

And has your family subscribed on their own?

[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 16 points 7 months ago

Oh, are they still open? I gave them up on that and the price increases, haven’t thought about Netflix in a while

[-] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

Ya I went to the seas instead. I'm glad to have not contributed to that rising profit, even if it only means a little.

[-] FiniteLooper@lemm.ee 12 points 7 months ago

I’m still using a password shared with me, no issues at all.

[-] GregorTacTac@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago

Even if someone shared their password with me I wouldn't use it because I like to be in control of my media. That's why I run a Jellyfin server.

[-] andrewta@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

My tip to you is

Shhhhhh

Enjoy it but do not talk about it.

[-] factotumus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 7 months ago

What is NetFlix? Is it a Stremio add-on?

[-] penquin@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago

What's next for the next quarter's profits? I mean your shareholders are not just gonna stop there. It's an infinite money pit, right?

[-] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

But the firm will stop reporting key subscriber numbers from next year.

They're going to pretend user attrition isn't happening as new subs burn out on content and the old "family" accounts recalculate the value of their subscriptions and start dropping or juggling netflix.

[-] unreliable@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 7 months ago

People hate Netflix, their show are crap. But bring profitszfor already rich people, great success in life...

We still share and it works flawlessly because non of us uses a television, all PC/laptop only and they can't find out as it seems.

[-] Adalast@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Cool, so it doesn't matter for the yo ho hos amongst us.

[-] CptEnder@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Their sign up for password sharing is extremely aggressive too. Once you login to your TV it forces you to see the plan information without any option to say no or skip, regardless if you've shared your account before. You then have to select the other non default option to opt out. IF you accidentally hit ok after frustratingly trying to leave the prompt you get auto billed for the new fee zero confirmation of CC or purchase information. You then immediately have to enter the cell number of who you want to share with without letting you leave or go back. They want that person's info regardless if you plan to share or not.

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I use my account at two households without much issue. I wish they were a little more lenient, but it’s better than Hulu’s implementation. I canceled Hulu TV because of it.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
223 points (100.0% liked)

News

23301 readers
2967 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS