1003
submitted 8 months ago by toaster@slrpnk.net to c/memes@slrpnk.net
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 112 points 8 months ago

To my knowledge, with plenty of carbon emisssions

[-] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 38 points 8 months ago

Is it less than using fossil fuels for power exclusively? If so then it's a step in the right direction. Yes I know it sounds like I'm shilling for BP now but we get lost in the doom spiral so fast we forget we are indeed making progress. We just have to keep their feet to the fire or...erm... solar panel?

[-] Aphelion@lemm.ee 57 points 8 months ago

They're not using electrolysis and water to make hydrogen, they're using power and steam to crack petroleum products into hydrogen.

[-] CapeWearingAeroplane@sopuli.xyz 22 points 8 months ago

And this is still a large step in the right direction, because cheap hydrogen creates an incentive to develop hydrogen infrastructure, which increases the demand for hydrogen, and can help lay the groundwork for a future in which hydrogen is produced from renewable sources.

Also, steam reforming lends itself well to CCS, and as such it can be performed without carbon emissions.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 19 points 8 months ago

There isn't a real need for hydrogen. We have plenty of other solutions. People have the expectation that our society changes from unsustainable to sustainable by just swapping in clean technologies in place of the dirty one's. That isn't going to happen, and hydrogen won't change that.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 10 points 8 months ago

Might've been a step forward 40 years ago. Today its finding a spot to dig in, so they can keep the fires of hell burning.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rhaedas@kbin.social 10 points 8 months ago

In the spirit of the comic - how is the solar panel made?

[-] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 9 points 8 months ago

Unfortunately, no. It's not. However, there is some nuance here. Even though their approach is more polluting, it allows infrastructure down the line such as modern cars to be upgraded to use hydrogen.

The hydrogen factory can then later be replaced by a non-polluting one. Much like how a lot of places switched to electricity while the power was being generated by natural gas. Some places moved to using nuclear later, and poof, carbon neutral.

In the end a transition is easier to divvy up progress with small architecture changes, not small bits of absolute carbon emissions / pollution

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 98 points 8 months ago

It was sad when the Physics Girl took Shell's money to shill hydrogen fuel cells.

I get you need to eat but still....a very shitty move.

[-] conquer4@lemmy.world 37 points 8 months ago

I can't even come close to imagining her medical bills, can you?

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 25 points 8 months ago

Is she "ok" now? The last I knew she was completely incapacitated and couldn't get out of bed. One hell of "long covid" case... :(

[-] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

That video is a really hard watch. If you’ve ever been in either of their positions taking care of a family member full time or relying on someone, you know the tremendous amount of love involved in it. Usually you see it as an afterthought, but what was amazing about Destin’s video is seeing it happen in real time.

[-] SoleInvictus 16 points 8 months ago

I have one of the conditions some doctors suspect is the root cause of long COVID, mast cell activation disorder, and it absolutely sucks ass if it's uncontrolled. It can make for some amazing naps, but they get old when it's all you can do.

I'm fine'ish now, although I guzzle the contents of a small pharmacy every month.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

She can't even make videos in her current state. This was done well before then. The fact that she is able to have the medical care she has now is a sign she didn't need that money though. She was obviously making enough from other more ethical sources. Now if she made that, I could excuse it, but it wasn't done now.

That said, her medical bills shouldn't be an issue for anyone. There are people out there in the same state but with much less support. They shouldn't have to suffer even more because they can't afford it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 8 months ago

The videos were made before she got long covid. I don't know how well she's doing now. My only updates about her are from the host of veritasium and only when I go looking for his videos.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] OwlHamster@lemm.ee 10 points 8 months ago

I remember coming away from her videos with the perception that hydrogen fuel cells are dumb. So she did a pretty bad job shilling it, if that is the case.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

I haven't heard about this. Can you elaborate on what happened?

[-] Gaspar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 8 months ago

Kari Byron, formerly of MythBusters fame, recently put out an ad for Shell. I believe she's also committed to a 3 year "docuseries" for them. See here for a thread on Lemmy.world with a link to the video

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 8 months ago

I can't find the specific video but here is the first video in her series: https://piped.video/watch?v=hghIckc7nrY

She says that the hydrogen is sourced using water and renewables but it's highly sus that Shell (or BP; I can't remember) was sponsoring the series.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 11 points 8 months ago

Shell does that all the time. Among the oil companies, they seem to be the biggest advocates for hydrogen.

They 100% know that electrolysis methods won't be economically viable. The path through hydrogen goes through traditional hydrocarbon sources.

One maybe possibly exception is the recent finds of underground hydrogen sources. Still unclear if that's going to be economically viable. But even if it is, we would just add it to the list of decarbonized energy sources. We're not short of solutions; we're short of political capital to implement them.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 60 points 8 months ago

Well, supposedly almost all hydrogen was made not long after the Big Bang went bang, with a tiny bit getting once in a while produced by the spontaneous formation of particle and anti-particle pairs, if I'm not mistaken.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 49 points 8 months ago

Yeah, but then it combines with stuff and is no longer hydrogen. For example, a lot of it on earth is bound with oxygen in a from known as dihydrogen monoxide. You can input energy to separate the two hydrogen from the oxygen, but it's not freely available. This is a useful way to spend excess energy to store the energy for later or to move, but not if you don't have excess clean energy.

You can also get some from things like Methane (CH4, aka natural gas). This is how most of the gas companies are producing it, and it obviously isn't clean. They like to pretend it's clean by saying using the hydrogen just produces water, but obviously the hydrogen didn't just appear.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_production

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

My favorite way to get hydrogen is mixing caustic soda, water and aluminum foil. Only cause I think it's funny you can get very explosive things from the grocery store

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Some is also produced by the decay of heavy elements (helium too)

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Johanno@feddit.de 40 points 8 months ago

With excess power from renewables. Which is highly inefficient. But better than not producing power when you could.

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 82 points 8 months ago

That's the ideal case, but in practice much of it is directly derived from natural gas instead of electrolysis

In 2022 less than 1% of hydrogen production was low-carbon.[1] Fossil fuels are the dominant source of hydrogen, for example by steam reforming of natural gas.[2]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_production

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Aphelion@lemm.ee 42 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Hah! It's amazing how many people are still hanging onto the delusion that hydrogen is made from renewables when almost every ounce of commercial hydrogen fuel is made by cracking petroleum products.

[-] CapeWearingAeroplane@sopuli.xyz 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

What you're saying is true. I still want to point out that developing hydrogen infrastructure based on non-renewable hydrogen today, helps lay the groundwork for using primarily renewable hydrogen tomorrow, because we're developing storage, transportation, and fuel cell technology.

Also: Methane can be produced from renewables, so developing steam reforming technology today, using non-renewable methane, helps lay the groundwork for renewable-based hydrogen production tomorrow.

Finally: Steam reforming lends itself well to CCS, so hydrogen production from renewable methane + CCS is a potentially viable path to a carbon-negative future.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Chestnut@lemmy.world 39 points 8 months ago

Is there a community for green memes like this? Love it

[-] Infynis@midwest.social 32 points 8 months ago
[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 28 points 8 months ago

Where do you think we are?

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago

In a general meme community

[-] Glitchington@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago

In a meme community on a solarpunk instance.

[-] Chestnut@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Didn't realize what instance I was on!

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Gotcha! I came here from the everything feed. I shall now subscribe!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lemann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 8 months ago

This is your stop, you can disembark the maglev! 😁

[-] ano_ba_to@sopuli.xyz 20 points 8 months ago

Oil companies really made hydrogen sound evil. Maybe that's what they wanted all along.

[-] daq@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 8 months ago

Exactly. Hydrogen can be produced easily with all the green energy produced during off peak that is otherwise wasted.

[-] Strykker@programming.dev 11 points 8 months ago

But it's usually produced by processing oil instead.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 20 points 8 months ago

You just pour water on solar panels or something.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

All hydrogen was made just after the Big Bang.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
1003 points (100.0% liked)

solarpunk memes

3013 readers
210 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS