258
submitted 5 months ago by naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca 44 points 5 months ago
[-] plz1@lemmy.world 44 points 5 months ago

I'm honestly more impressed about that last line, running at 70 million for 17.5 minutes. Duration/stability being the key to this tech, that's pretty impressive.

[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That is the point, not to reach 100 millon dimming meanwhile the lights in the rest of the country. Stability continued, not only for few minutes and positive energy production is the goal, not archived yet, nor in the next decade.

[-] stewie3128@lemmy.ml 11 points 5 months ago

Well, clearly, to be China is against the rules.

[-] NoRamyunForYou@lemmy.nz 36 points 5 months ago

It feels like there's a lot more positive stories coming out about fusion lately :)

[-] Kyrrrr@mander.xyz 35 points 5 months ago
[-] z00s@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

The goal is to get it as hot as McDonald's coffee

[-] Noodle07@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Just hot enough to fuse labias shut

[-] Turbo@lemmy.ml 10 points 5 months ago

Does this contribute to warming the planet? 😁

[-] Kit 27 points 5 months ago

No, nuclear is a viable addition to other clean energy initiatives.

[-] Instigate@aussie.zone 18 points 5 months ago

Particularly nuclear fusion, which doesn’t generate long-lived radioactive isotopes as byproducts of energy production. Nuclear fission still has a place to be sure, but once we crack the dilemmas with fusion all bets are off when it comes to generating huge amounts of clean energy.

[-] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 21 points 5 months ago

It warms one small part of the planet by about 100 million degrees.

[-] AToM_exe@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Hopefully it will contribute to warm up everyones home one day.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago
[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

Testing and stuff probably does by a tiny fraction, because they need to use insane amounts of power to get it started which is probably produced by coal/oil.

But once it's actually working and producing more power than it consumes it will be the best solution to stopping greenhouse gases for energy production. It would be the end of gas/oil/coal in the energy sector. Probably wouldn't even need to use solar or wind anymore.

[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 months ago

In fusion reactors there is a lot of talk about the temperatures they reach and the time it manages to work, but all this corresponds more to propaganda publications. The real problem is achieving net energy production and at this point they are not much further ahead than the fusion reactor built by a boy in a garage a few years ago. Achieving nuclear fusion is not that complicated, it is complicated to do it by extracting more energy than invested and this is still a minimum of 10 years away.

[-] gaussian_noise@beehaw.org 3 points 5 months ago

The main parameter that determines if a fusion reactor generates net power is called its triple product, equal to the product of the plasma density, temperature, and confinement time. So setting records of time spent at operating temperatures is making important progress towards net power production.

this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
258 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32083 readers
763 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS