774
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 113 points 6 months ago

I’d only accept a “dry promotion” to improve my resume. Then I’d quit.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 42 points 6 months ago

Here's a secret: your resume is whatever you write on a piece of paper. You can just get a volunteer role if you want to be a director or lead something.

Don't ever work for free unless you care about the end result. And definitely don't ever work for free for your own company. You can't be paid what you don't ask for.

[-] Dagnet@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Maybe you get paid the same but work half the time? (won't happen, but would be a 'dry' promotion I would take)

[-] avater@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

Nope. I want the promotion, the increase in salary and the halfed working hours.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] obinice@lemmy.world 102 points 6 months ago

If it's a promotion to less work, maybe.

Maybe.

[-] MashedTech@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago

Is there a risk of more responsibility and more risk in general? Meaning if something goes wrong, you can get fucked easier?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Landless2029@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

That's not how this works at all.

You keep doing all your current responsibilities. Then you get these more with no additional compensation.

Do it for the exposure!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] poshKibosh@sh.itjust.works 93 points 6 months ago

I got a “dry” promotion at my last position, and obviously I took it. I then put my new title on my Resume, when job hunting for a few months and found a new position that came with a 20%+ pay raise.

I’m actually a big fan of promotions that don’t include raises, because it shows that your employer doesn’t actually value you as an employee, and enables you to get a much larger raise at a new company compared to whatever raise your current employer would’ve given you if they cared at all about retention.

[-] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 23 points 6 months ago

This works great for highly educated white collars!

Not for the other 70%+ of the workforce though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Landless2029@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

This is the way.

Always take the promotion. Then update the resume and start hunting.

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 13 points 6 months ago

Preach it. I fought and fought to get my ASQs and CQEs (quality certs) as an automations guy. I worked in fda/dea/gmp environments with those systems so why they hell not. Took 2 years to finally get both and bailed immediately. Did all my bs six sigma bullshit along the way.

If it's a smash and grab for them then it's a smash and grab for me.

[-] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 87 points 6 months ago

Capitalism 2: Slavery Boogaloo

[-] cybervseas@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago

Except Capitalism 2 is actually quite a fun computer game…

[-] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 71 points 6 months ago

As others have said, you take the 'promotion' and IMMEDIATELY start looking for a new job with your new title on your resume.

Corporations are not loyal to you. Do not be loyal to them.

[-] el_abuelo@lemmy.ml 69 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I took a promotion without a pay rise on the agreement it would come when pay was reviewed annually. A shit deal, but one I was prepared to accept on the balance of things. I made clear that if they didn't follow through then I would immediately demote myself and start looking for a new job.

Pay review came around and it was below inflation. I immediately demoted myself and started looking for a new job. I even requested an internal transfer that was denied (made them too much money where I was).

I handed in my notice a short while later and everyone was, to my surprise, surprised. I really didn't understand why the shock....until I learned in due course that most people don't follow through.

Funnier still, I returned 6 months later (due to a quirk in contracts) at double the salary in the dept I requested a transfer to.

Anyway my point is - do what is to your benefit, always. Companies can play games - as can you.

[-] Wes_Dev@lemmy.ml 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I handed in my notice a short while later and everyone was, to my surprise, surprised. I really didn’t understand why the shock…until I learned in due course that most people don’t follow through.

When I was a young adult, I used to work as a lab tech in a plasma center. That involved taking liter bottles of plasma, checking the computer system, filling out paperwork, drawing fluid and taking blood vials to run in a centrifuge, and frequently having to redo paperwork because the barely-trained phlebotomists kept sending them to me covered in drops of blood. Of course, this not only took longer, but meant I had to sanitize the entire area, change PPE, and get shit from the rest of the team for not just taking their biohazard-contaminated paperwork regardless. The room held 50 to 100 donors at a time, and the lab team was just two people.

My immediate boss would routinely just fucking disappear or taking random lunches, even during rushes, leaving me to handle everything on my own. She'd get pissy over small things, and spent time chatting with management in the offices, just hanging out, while I did all the work.

One day, she did something like this and left. I muttered to myself that I was going to quit. I finished the sample I was working on and went into the -40 degree biohazard freezer to store the sample.

Cut to a minute later, I came out of the freezer to see someone from management in the lab, saying "I heard you're quitting?"

...what?

She said "Fine then. Go ahead and go." (or something like that.)

I was stunned, but realized that my shitty manager must have heard me on her way out, and fucking told on me. I hadn't planned on following through, and was mostly just upset at being used, but now?

"Fuck it." I thought. "I said I'll do it, so I'll do it."

I'm not a good speaker, but I basically stumbled over some short apology like that I would have finished the work day first, but would leave now if she wanted to. Her reply was to get all exasperated, as if she hadn't expected me to do anything but crumple at being confronted, and she told me "Well, have a nice life then!" as I walked out the door. Never saw her or my shitty manager again. Years later, I did hear my shitty manager had gotten fired or something, for being shit at hear job.

I think I made the right choice.

(Edited for typos, so many typos....)

[-] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

I want the games to end. Fun time is over

[-] melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago

And their promises mean nothing.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] PainInTheAES@lemmy.world 46 points 6 months ago

Hey this basically happened to me. I got a 1 dollar raise offer for moving into a management role. Negotiating a higher pay Tuesday. Wish me luck!

[-] redditron_2000_4@lemmy.world 62 points 6 months ago

Good luck, but when you are turned down you should recognize the red flag and start looking for your new, better job, leveraging your new title to get paid what it is worth.

[-] PainInTheAES@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago

That's the plan... I'm still in school and the jobs pretty flexible so I may stick it out for a bit but it's worth a shot.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 41 points 6 months ago

Your "meal" doesn't come with food.

Your "marriage" doesn't come with love.

Your "car" doesn't come with an engine

Do the above sound ridiculous?

Now re-read the headline.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Your “marriage” doesn’t come with love.

That part doesn't sound all that ridiculous, to be honest.

The other two...

[-] Patches@sh.itjust.works 32 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Once got offered a promotion to make less. Made $15/hr as a "Junior" but got 1.5x Overtime and there was always as much overtime as you wanted.

Got offered a "Not Junior" full-time role for $30,000/year.

Just got up and left. Went home and started applying elsewhere. I know I was replacing a person who made 60k

[-] twig@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

So the industry that I was in for a long time was production based, meaning your income is reflected by your physical performance. It was extremely demanding and also quite high paying.

So, I got stupidly good at this job. And I rarely took on additional responsibilities, because that would actually mean more stress and less money. In this industry, there were two reasons to go into management: you either had trouble coping with the physical strain that came with this insane work, or because you wanted to hold power over others. But it wasn't a pay bump and it was more work/responsibility. Consequently the people who took this on were rarely the people who should have and the industry on the whole suffers accordingly.

[-] Underwaterbob@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago

Haha! I worked for a contract cleaning crew for some time. Turnover was very high since the hours and wages sucked. The only people who hung around long enough to become managers were eminently unfit to be managers. Seems like managers are destined to suck for a large number of reasons.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 28 points 6 months ago

Of course you do.

The goal is not to earn more. The goal is to do fuck all.

[-] GluWu@lemm.ee 28 points 6 months ago

I was once asked if I wanted to be the project manager for a system I was working on. Purely a internal title with no pay increase. Lol, fuck no.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Well you can do the route of getting some PM experience and then doing that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 10 points 6 months ago

Increased responsibility = increased compensation.

[-] Minotaur@lemm.ee 21 points 6 months ago

Kind of an odd article, as sometimes there really are reasonable times for a “promotion” with little/no pay increase.

A lot of manual labor and trades positions require experienced people to be management, supervisors, etc. When you take a promotion in a field like this you might have “more responsibility” but the same pay, and that makes sense. Why? Well - because you’re not fucking breaking your back or manning a line all day. I think most people who have worked one of these jobs sees that as reasonable.

Unfortunately, most journalists and many people making online posts about the topic are people who have really only ever worked behind a computer, or ever worked in a big city - so these articles tend to focus on that kind of “technocrat” job sphere where everyone is just some variation of “computer manager person”

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago

Nah, fuck that. Promotions should be coming with a reasonable wage increase in every job.

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] KidnappedByKitties@lemm.ee 14 points 6 months ago

You need to join a union.

What your spouting is corporate propaganda, designed to make you value your labor less. As is the "not making more than the others"-lie which oppressors have used to control their populations for ages.

But there are different perspectives to the situation, so for academical purposes, let's explore a few:

Labour market model; If you're doing work that requires skills, knowledge and/or combinations thereof that are harder to acquire, your rarity and thus value increases - you should be paid more in cash and/or benefits.

This includes institutional knowledge, how things are done at the specific workplace, including who to talk with and how.

Economics/value capture; If you're doing work that brings the employer more profits, such as organising, costing, budgeting or taking over tasks to let the employer scale up - you should be paid a part of those increased profits.

The case for cooperatives; If you truly would be equal, and comfortable, in a workplace there's much to be said that wage differences disturb that harmony, and you could see it as playing different parts in a commune.

This does however assume that you are all equally invested in the goal, it is profitable enough to compensate all of you fairly and equally, and enough that you are not wanting, or at least equally lacking. This is the case for situations like homesteads, communist society, and anarchist societies like Star Trek or The Culture.

Hmm...

From my perspective, the only reasonable way to get a promotion without increased pay is if you're working less (which 4-day week studies show isn't connected to weekly hours), and getting benefits to compensate.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Maeve@kbin.social 14 points 6 months ago

And you're still saddled with responsibility for the whole crew, the whole job and coming in on budget. Mental work saves the body but at mental expense. Maybe C-suite and board should take pay cuts so everyone gets decently paid for quality work with quality tools and quality materials.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] comfydecal@infosec.pub 6 points 6 months ago

This is a very interesting take and observation, thank you for sharing

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 6 points 6 months ago

Hatred of intellectual elites is one of the signs of fascism, BTW.

Anyway, you are not paid for breaking your back, you're paid for having a valuable skill. If that skill is just being a grunt, everyone can do it, you are replaceable. If that skill is managing grunts, only few can do it, you are less replaceable, thus can get a higher pay.

If you really think, moving into a superior role doesn't deserve more pay, you are being fucked by your employer. You don't understand the system you're working in and you're lashing out against those stoopid office workers because you don't understand that they are not responsible for your misery, your boss is.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Shotgun_Alice@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago
[-] tiefling 15 points 6 months ago

Yes, take it. Then immediately update your resume with your new job title and look for another job.

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

Hahahahaha 😂... Oh you're serious? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA 🤣🤣🤣🤣, fuck no.

[-] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Life doesnt have to be this way. We can thrive, not barely survive. We just need to keep trying new things till something works while we still have time.

How do we try new things? We do away with First post voting and get an opportunity to vote for people and political parties that have fresh ideas. With a electoral system like Ranked Choice voting, people would feel safe to vote for whomsoever they wish, as their vote would still be counted even if their preference didn't win.

Just search for videos on FPTP voting if you want an explanation on how and why the spoiler effect exists.

Electoral reform is possible in each individual state (for now), we dont need federal reform! Maine and Alaska have already passed electoral reform.

Republicans are moving to make alternative electoral systems illegal in their states. Republicans LOVE first past the post voting. Just sbsolutely adore it. Why would you want to use the same voting system republicans want?

More political parties means a higher percentage of the population is representedby their choices in the voting booth. More peopleinvolvedin the electoral process, more people engaged.

Its a win win win all around for not just the people, but also for the democratic party. More people voting means more democratic votes. The numbers dont lie. So what’s the hold up blue states?

Some day we will be able to vote for who best represents our interests. We won't need to grovel on our knees, begging for representationin government. We won't need to wait for the Republican party to stop existing.

We can do it right now.

Consider starting a campaign to change how we vote in your own state! Force our representatives to compete with fresh outside ideas. We deserve the best representation, not excuses.

[-] lordmauve@programming.dev 7 points 6 months ago

Obligatory plug for STAR Voting, not Ranked Choice Voting. STAR voting better avoids situations where voting for a preferred candidate can cause a less preferred candidate to win.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

This is kind of dumb on the part of companies. There's a great reason to take these: you can market experience in that position when you're applying for jobs elsewhere. You want to give me SVP title with no raise? I will find someone who will pay happily.

[-] TAG@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Sorry to be a contrarian, but sometimes a change in title is a reward in itself, especially if it does not involve a change in job responsibility. In some large corporations, there are pay ranges that are determined by your title. It could be that you are on the higher end of the pay range for your existing role, so it is hard for your supervisor to justify why you should be getting more money. By giving you a dry promotion, it becomes easier to give you a fat raise during the compensation review season. At many companies, there is a certain time of the year to give people promotions and then later on in the year to give raises.

[-] DessertStorms@kbin.social 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

By giving you a dry promotion, it becomes easier to give you a fat raise during the compensation review season.

Easier for who? And how exactly? The idea that some schedule is stopping corporate from giving the lowly worker a raise becomes completely laughable when you see how they treat their top management, and has no validity either way - they make the rules, their hands are never tied by this kind of bullshit.

You're not being "contrarian", you're just regurgitating corporate propaganda, actively acting against your own interests by swallowing any of it, and serving them by repeating it to us as if it has any legitimacy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 12 points 6 months ago

By giving you a dry promotion, it becomes easier to give you a fat raise during the compensation review season.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[-] KidnappedByKitties@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago

It might be hard for the supervisor, but only because they are also part of an exploitative system not compensating labor fairly.

Pay ranges determined by title isn't fact, it's decided by the company. Having promotions given once per year as well, as is the decision to raise salaries at a different time.

Just as they can make sure to pay their bills on time every month, they can make sure to promote and pay their workers on time every time.

Yes, the supervisor is working from inside the system, but that means you're in this together and should rise together against the system. You both need to join a union.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] magnetosphere@fedia.io 8 points 6 months ago

… especially if it does not involve a change in job responsibility.

Key point. That would be worth considering.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
774 points (100.0% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9663 readers
435 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS