512
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 132 points 9 months ago

But instead, we decided to make a very small number of people extremely rich.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 48 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Bernie is pushing for 32/week.

If he was president we might have gotten it, but Biden sure as shit isn't even going to mention it.

American workers are more productive than at any point in history, it's just all the wealth goes into a very small number of pockets, and instead of having to pay taxes, they pay a small percent to politicians in both parties to ensure workers don't get any

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

I wouldn't say we'd have gotten it. Being president doesn't mean you control Congress.

[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 months ago

Well he probably wouldnt have broken the railroad strike at least

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 9 months ago

They got everything they wanted from the strike without having to fuck up the US economy. Stop thinking you’re dunking on Biden with this one, it’s stupid.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub 8 points 9 months ago

We nothing. Hold the people who voted for Reagan responsible.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 88 points 9 months ago

Here's the thing. We could have that right now, today, we're there, they're right. Computers and just useful software (fuck AI) alone have increased productivity so much that one guy with fancy Excel can do the work of what used to take 98 people (7 banks x 14 person abacus teams). And that's just one regional bank. Before email, corporations had internal mailing departments, now there's dirt cheap and super convenient email. There are untold numbers of shell scripts out there quietly replacing whole ass departments of people. Soft automation alone, no robots needed, has increased human productivity to an absolutely bonkers degree since these statements were written. Thanks to the Friedman doctrine and Reagan and Thatcher and their ilk, all the benefits of that productivity got turned into a benefits for the asset holding class, while the middle and lower classes got lectures on the morality of hard work.

[-] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

Flawless .

People talk about the age of abundance - we’ve been living it for decades. Money is created out thin air, automation and industrial have done the rest.

Marx called it 100 years ago. Thomas Piketty nailed it down a few years ago : Surplus goes to assets owners - the more assets you own, the more surplus you accumulate and it’s effective are compound over the time. Until you have a handful of people people who own all the asset, which is where we are now.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

People used to physically carry boxes of paper checks out to planes to be shipped between banks.

As a kid, my dad used to tell me stuff like that. He believed it too. He worked 2 jobs 6 days a week all his life to die in relative poverty.

People make wealth issues generational. It's not. It's a narrative to divide and conquer.

It's the rich vs the poor. It's always been.

[-] Speculater@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

My dad still works in his 70s and fights vehemently against any talk of making life easier for the younger generation. People are weird man.

[-] cupcakezealot 65 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

damn this sounds like a lovely world where republicans ceased to exist since 1967

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 59 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

By the year 2040, you'll eat bugs on your way into your 16 hour job making 13 Bezos bucks an hour and you'll love it because the serotonin patches and nightly dream implants (implant so that you dot wake up while your frontal cortex is being used to mine doge coin).

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 28 points 9 months ago

The best part is, for every 10 commercials you watch in your sleep, you get up to 1 dream back free at the end of the month!

[-] altasshet@lemmy.ca 17 points 9 months ago

The "up to" makes this particularly depressing. And realistic.

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 months ago

Well, naturally they have to deduct for uninsurable dream content like trees and sunshine. That kind of dangerous content needs to be distilled before it reaches you by choosing a secure dream provider. We're trying to protect children here.

[-] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I hope you don't mind, I just went to your profile and clicked "favorite"

😄

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 52 points 9 months ago

Interesting predictions from the 60s.

It turns out that in the early 70s, “we” decided to give everything to corporations and those already wealthy instead. Productivity did indeed continue to skyrocket, but wages have stagnated since then. For 50+ years we’ve been getting robbed.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 46 points 9 months ago

Billionaires and bastard corporations: Yoink

[-] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago

Greed? No no, these are just our record profits! Invest. Now.

[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 44 points 9 months ago

This would have happened if Reagan hadn't sunk that ship. Now realistically, if it hadn't been him it would've been someone else. Politicians are cheap.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 43 points 9 months ago

They're right.

We could do this.

We just don't.

[-] bAZtARd@feddit.de 14 points 9 months ago

And it would even be better for the planet

[-] LoamImprovement@beehaw.org 32 points 9 months ago

The timeline where Reagan didn't fucking gut the unions.

[-] Tarcion@sh.itjust.works 28 points 9 months ago

To be fair, these were good predictions. All of this is actually possible. It's just capitalism being the problem it usually is..

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FrogLessEdit@lemmy.one 22 points 9 months ago
[-] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 12 points 9 months ago

The late 60's is when George Welch became the head of the GE plastics division, in 71' he also became the head of the GE metallurgy division. Throughout the 60 he developed and popularized "rank and yank", basically firing 10% of your lowest performing employees on a regular basis.

The idea of corporate having loyalty to their consumers and workers died at the hands of George Welch. The obsession with quarterly profits, paper profits, and maximizing short term gains are all basically the invention of this one little man.

He was made a titan of industry for parting out one of the most iconic and profitable businesses in US history. Pretty much every CEO has walked in his image since, despite the fact that he ran He into the ground.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago

Is the takeaway from that site unpegging the USD from gold caused the current wage crisis?

[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

This is what it was like when the people of the country worked together to make the future better for everyone. Not self improvement, not local; it was understood across the country that people should plant trees without expecting to sit in its shade. Plan for the future and give the next generation the best chance.

Those articles were written in the 60s. At the very least each author was born 18 years prior, part of the silent generation. The future they hoped, expected, and built was for boomers.

A generation of greed has killed almost all hope for future generations. It only took one to fuck it up for everyone else.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 18 points 9 months ago

Hey they were close! We make 30-40k in (2024 Dollars)

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 8 points 9 months ago

The sheer amount of jobs that post that range as the expected salary is insanely depressing and disgusting...

I don't think people truly understand just how much of our economy operates with those pay scales. I'm uneducated so I don't have a specific industry to get tunnel vision with, I see a broad range of jobs and holy shit it is gross what is being "offered."

On a side note, my friend in computer science just mentioned a coworker who makes over 150k is quitting because he has too much down time at work. Just kill me already, I've had enough torture...

[-] paholg@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

That was for nonworking families.

[-] KISSmyOS@feddit.de 17 points 9 months ago

"HAHAHA...no"

– Capitalists

[-] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 17 points 9 months ago

This is so uniquely depressing. They were accurate on my annual wage in 2024 yet they assumed I’d be working less than 40 hours 😭

[-] Bonehead@kbin.social 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I think you misread that, because $40,000 in 1966 is roughly $385,000 in today's dollars.

Edit: conversely, $40,000 in today's dollars would be $4,176.25 in 1966.

Pretty sure that's the joke

[-] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago

That was the joke. I make $40k today.

[-] Sabata11792@kbin.social 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I got that wage, but not accounting for inflation...

[-] Oiconomia@feddit.de 4 points 9 months ago

With the 1966 labour share of income you probably would be working way less (or making way more)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Doug7070@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

For reference, $30,000.00 in 1966 would equate to over ~$285,000.00 in 2024's USD.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

I'd say in a given week I do maybe fifteen minutes of real, actual work - Peter Gibbons

[-] serpentofnumbers@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 9 months ago
[-] Very_Bad_Janet@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago

I would encourage almost any American to get a remote job (or three) and move abroad to a country that has a visa for remote workers and good healthcare. It might be the only way some workers will be able to save and retire some day.

[-] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago

Well, in Germany we have legal Holdiays at least...

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] chairman@feddit.nl 5 points 9 months ago

Not incorrect, Jeff Bezos is working fewer than 4 days a week and fewer than 8 hours on a workday.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
512 points (100.0% liked)

Damn, that's interesting!

4722 readers
2 users here now

  1. No clickbait
  2. No Racism and Hate speech
  3. No Imgur Gallery Links
  4. No Infographics
  5. Moderator Discretion
  6. Repost Guidelines
  7. No videos over 15 minutes long
  8. No "Photoshopped" posts
  9. Image w/ text posts must be sourced in comments

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS