47
submitted 7 months ago by ooli@lemmy.world to c/space@lemmy.world
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 52 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

They say the study was published in the “Advancing Earth and Space Science Journal”, without mentioning the authors, date, or title.

“Advancing Earth and Space Science” is the tagline of the American Geophysical Union, which has 24 journals—none of which are actually called the “Advancing Earth and Space Science Journal”. Presumably they were reading an article from one of those journals on the AGU website, and mistook the tagline at the top of the page for the journal name.

So does anyone know what study they’re actually referring to?

[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 38 points 7 months ago

I'm pretty sure the whole article is bullshit. Not that the facts are incorrect, but that they aren't researched and are likely just regurgitated content either generated by AI, or an editor that gets paid by the click. It's all part of LADbible, which has never been a bastion of journalism to me.

[-] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 42 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Following the study, which was published in the Advancing Earth and Science Journal, the researchers found that it would not possible for humans to stay on Mars long-term.

They found that human exposure to radiation threats, including particle radiation from the Sun, distant stars, and galaxies, would exceed safe levels after four years on the planet.

Is this on the surface, or below ground? I thought it was a common assumption that until we get a magnetic shield up and do a bit of terraforming, any long-term habitats would have to be subsurface.

[-] BaseModelHuman@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The article was disappointingly lacking, but would radiation still not penetrate Mars crust to a certain degree? Having the terraforming capability and magnetic shield in place within a 4 year period per individual seems to be the constraints implied.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 26 points 7 months ago

It does, but a thick layer of matter is actually a pretty good radiation shield. Material is rated based on its "halving distance" - how many centimeters of stuff it takes for the radiation passing through it to be reduced by half. It never quite blocks all of it, but if you keep piling on additional halvings you can get the radiation levels down as small as you want.

This article has a table of values for how well various types of material blocks gamma rays, for example. Sand has a halving distance of 2.9 inches, and solid stone is 2.2 inches, so a couple of feet thickness will provide thousand-fold reduction in radiation.

Other kinds of radiation penetrate heavy elements better, but those kinds of radiation actually get blocked by light elements instead, such as the hydrogen in water. Mars has a relative abundance of water so you can incorporate that into your shielding too.

[-] dgriffith@aussie.zone 5 points 7 months ago

Probably the first inhabitants would live/sleep directly under their landing craft, or in the bottom half of it. You've got the whole of Mars as a shield on one side of you and about a hundred tons of steel, water, cargo, and fuel on the other.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 7 months ago

It'll penetrate anything to a certain degree, but my understanding is it'd block the vast majority and be safe.

Yeah but rock is a hell of a radiation shield too.

[-] Icalasari@fedia.io 29 points 7 months ago

Four years seems like a bizarre number, and the sources aren't linked to. I feel like this may be AI generated nonsense

[-] remotelove@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Another source for estimated radiation exposure on Mars: https://phys.org/news/2016-11-bad-mars.html

A newer study on the depth you need to be under martian soil: https://eos.org/editor-highlights/life-on-mars-estimating-radiation-risks-for-martian-astronauts (spoiler: trying to live at a depth of 30cm is bad)

Interesting study: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3797711/ (spoiler, you be fucked.)

I read and linked some things and my 3am napkin math didn't produce any valid numbers in the 4 yr range. (My first thought is that radiation is going to the the least of your problems when visiting Mars, TBH.)

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 14 points 7 months ago

Four years??? I assumed humans would struggle to survive four minutes on Mars!

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

It's like the bottom of the ocean in that way: with current technology, it's not suitable for human or billionaire life.

[-] MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works 16 points 7 months ago

I dunno, I feel like the billionaires are built different and they'd be able to handle it. Let's just send them anyway and see what happens.

[-] ItsAFake@lemmus.org 5 points 7 months ago
[-] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 4 points 7 months ago
[-] Kata1yst@kbin.social 3 points 7 months ago

Yeah, most of the Mars missions planned are around 900 days round trip, around 500 of which will be on Mars waiting for the next transfer window. All of them include the astronauts being well shielded from radiation.

[-] Emerald@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

That headline makes it sound like the human lifespan is <4 years

[-] Donebrach@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

The MCR would like a word.

this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
47 points (100.0% liked)

Space

8724 readers
2 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

🔭 Science

🚀 Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS