1188
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

At this point we've only had finals for the events that use children's guns. I'm not really surprised that China would beat us at shooting children's guns. They'd probably win a tricycle race too.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago

TIL some people think there's such a thing as a gun for children.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 26 points 1 year ago

if you told me they sell a gun specifically for children in texas i would absolutely believe it.

that state is fucking crazy

[-] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 15 points 1 year ago

There’s a brand of 22 rifles named cricket that are specifically designed to teach children how to shoot they’ve got built-in safety locks that are a bitch if you lose the key

[-] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

They do in California too. It's the whole country.

[-] problematicPanther@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I was just in the bass pro shop in Memphis the other day, and I did in fact see light caliber rifles specifically marketed for children to use.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Well we do have frequent school shootings in America, so any gun that’s been used must be a children’s gun right? /S

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

This comment makes me sad

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Aren’t you from Indiana? I just assumed y’all had free .22s for underprivileged children.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

They probably did in most of Indiana, but I grew up in Bloomington and it's the evil librul leftie commie part of Indiana where a bunch of old hippies who are still hippies settled around the horrible liberal indoctrination center of Indiana University, so they only gave us water pistols.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Oh that makes sense. You were indoctrinated by the evil IU. Why I bet that Kinsey man taught you all sorts of left wing lies like that it’s more ok for a man to love another man than to love his rifle in an intimate way.

[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

As a matter of fact, that is a thing that exists. I had a special child-sized .22 rifle when I was 5 years old. My parents kept it safely stored and allowed me to practice with it under close supervision. Sears made them, marketed as a "youth" model.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Well that's disturbing... imagine how many parents, especially today, wouldn't keep it safely stored or allow their kid to practice with it only under close supervision.

In theory, in a world where every gun owner was responsible, it wouldn't worry me. We don't live in that world.

[-] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 29 points 1 year ago

Oh, I didn't realise there was a drone strike event coming up.

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

It could legitimately be an Olympic sport. Although they would need to disguise the name by calling it something like "precision drone-flying" where the goal is to drop a water balloon filled with paint onto a target or something

[-] jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago

You're just making up a sport for the Ukrainians so they can get a gold medal

[-] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They've been through a lot, they should get something nice from it.

when do we get the zero V to altitude in X seconds competition, would love to see another streak eagle shenanigan occur.

[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

What guns do you imagine they will shoot next? Are you expecting the event to be sponsored by Armalite? Do you think Kalashnikova will show?

[-] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I think OP was pointing out that several of the competitions use air guns, but conveniently glossed over the one with shotguns (which I'm sure OP will love to know, China got a silver medal...)

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Also, the air guns they use are absolutely not for children.

It's like saying they throw a discus for children in that sport because it looks like a frisbee.

[-] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Shotguns. No, and no.

It'd be nice if they had a long range category with real rifles. Most countries are already uncomfortable letting their people have access to Olympic pea shooters, so I don't think we'll ever see 1000 meter shooting as an event.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

You do know shooting sport guns are built specifically for shooting sports at the Olympic level, right? You seem to think power is more important than accuracy. I doubt any of the athletes agree.

But I'm sure there's some sort of "Redneck Games" or something where people use AR-15s with bump stocks and Colt .45s to target shoot. You should check YouTube.

[-] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm just not impressed with any marksmanship that maxes out at 50 meters. Regardless of how powerful a gun is it's not impressive to be accurate at such a short range. I don't care about how powerful the gun is, I just want to see it fling something far enough to be interesting.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

I'm sure we're all sorry that the world's best target shooters don't impress you. Unfortunately, no one took you into consideration when arranging the Olympics.

[-] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

The world's best target shooters under a very specific and particular set of circumstances, usually indoors. It's like you're trying to insult me for not being impressed at the driving skills of the world's best indoor go-kart racers.

[-] tlou3please@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Like every single olympic sport can only be performed in a very specific and particular set of circumstances. What is this bizarre gatekeeping?

[-] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's like if they wanted to have motorsports in the Olympics but they only did go-karts and 49cc motorcycles. The people who show up to compete will be talented, but they aren't driving F1 or MotoGP.

[-] tlou3please@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

What do you mean? Why is more power in the equipment being used automatically better? Shooting is a test of accuracy. I'm sorry you see sports through such a boring lens but most of us don't. And in any case, that's just your opinion of what you are more entertained by - there's no need to disparage the sport and disrespect the athletes just because you're not personally interested in it.

[-] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

What do you mean?

Olympic shooting is so specialized and restricted that you can no longer claim its champions are the best in the world at the general sport of shooting.

Why is more power in the equipment being used automatically better?

Because more power is required to reach the distances where everything matters more.

Shooting is a test of accuracy.

Uh-huh. Do I really need to explain how one degree of error is a bigger issue at 1000 meters vs 50?

there's no need to disparage the sport and disrespect the athletes

When OP is implying my tribe can't shoot I take it as disrespect and I'm compelled to belittle the competition itself in response.

[-] tlou3please@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You could equally say that the javelin is restricting throwing, and that javeline athletes can only perform in their specific area. Like yeah - no shit. It's a sport. It's like looking at darts and saying "it'd be better if they fired them from a crossbow at 200m". Like okay yeah maybe you'd find that more entertaining but that would be a different sport which you're welcome to go enjoy.

Because more power is required to reach the distances where everything matters more.

I'm not even sure what that means. Why does it "matter more"? Those in the athletic field of shooting have decided that this is best for a recreational shooting competition. Same as every other sport in the Olympics. Go watch something else if it doesn't interest you, doesn't make the sport bad or the athletes less talented.

Uh-huh. Do I really need to explain how one degree of error is a bigger issue at 1000 meters vs 50?

No shit. But if everyone is shooting from the same distance then it's a level playing field so it doesn't matter and it's still a valid competition. There are different skills for different types of weapons and ranges.

When OP is implying my tribe can't shoot I take it as disrespect and I'm compelled to belittle the competition itself in response.

It's a meme about the notoriously gun crazy country coming last in shooting. It's not that deep. And let's not even get into "my tribe" haha

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

No, I'm trying to suggest that if you don't like it, don't watch it. What's the point in telling everyone why Olympic athletes don't impress you?

[-] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I didn't watch it, but I did run across some bullshit on the Internet implying that the Chinese dominating ping pong somehow means the US can't compete at Tennis.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

And because of that you decide to dunk on a bunch of athletes?

[-] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, absolutely. They're the world's best Candy Land players while we're playing Catan or some shit over here.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

And I suppose you'd do much better than any of them.

[-] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not going to win a cup stacking competition anytime soon either, but that doesn't mean I have to take it seriously as a sport and respect the competitors.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You have no respect for people with skills you don't have? Quite arrogant of you.

[-] tlou3please@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Hahahaha why aren't you in the bloody Olympics then if it's that easy?

[-] Hegz@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

Til 12 gauge double barrel shotguns are for children.

[-] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Big colourful bullets so little fingies can use them. It's basically a nerf gun!

[-] yesman@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

When you say "children's gun" do you mean a gun for children to use, or a gun designed to use on children?

[-] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

For children to use.

[-] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I thought American guns Are for shooting children...

[-] mriormro@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

No, they're for shooting ourselves when we've had enough of the crushing capitalism.

[-] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Maybe the army guys that the US sent over for trap shooting got lost on the way?

Or perhaps shotguns are for babies, and they only know how to fire rockets or something.

this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
1188 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

9706 readers
1942 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS