1300
Both sides! (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 6 points 3 months ago

Why, after that force is used to successfully establish themselves, those countries never actually empower the lower classes?

China has been secure on the world stage for decades, yet their people still work as wage slaves for the benefit of the western bourgeoise interests.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

take a look at how quality of life, health, education and most aspects of society improves vastly under socialism.

also take a look at the time scale at which such things happen.

we also have capitalism.

[-] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 6 points 3 months ago

The Foxconn building had to put up nets around their building because so many employees were committing suicide due to their extremely poor working conditions.

You're suggesting that is simply a necessary evil on the long road to real socialism? Marx said there needs to be 100 years of capitalist industrialization before a communist revolution can succeed (which I disagree with, but let's roll with it). China was able to enact a successful revolution without waiting 100 years of wage slavery, only to then become a wage slave accepting nation? To what end is this benefitting the proletariat? China doesn't have free higher education, and they don't have fully free healthcare.

Meanwhile, Anarchists in Spain were able to liberate the working class and eliminate money mid-revolution. They lost the war due to lack of access to weapons/logistics, but nothing about enacting those social revolutions seemed to be terribly detrimental to their efforts.

China seems to have willfully become capitalist itself (pretty lame of them), so, at least from the average worker's standpoint, it seems relatively inconsequential whether they are a wage slave in mainland china, or in any other capitalist country.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

some say dengism was a necessary evil, yes. i personally disagree, they should have been able to do better like others before. the results came for the next generation though, and it didn't need all those 100 years.

setbacks are part of history everywhere else too, and don't paint the entire picture.

[-] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

the results came for the next generation though, and it didn’t need all those 100 years.

I assume you mean the current generation in China? If so, the results seem to be less than ideal, to put it mildly. I would posit that the Nordic countries (and possibly most of the EU) offer better living and working conditions to the working class, even under their neoliberal welfare state. I certainly don't see where China is excelling in that regard.

setbacks are part of history everywhere else too, and don’t paint the entire picture.

The question is; now that China is a wealthy world power, what exactly is stopping them from enacting more radical social changes to make it actually look like a socialist country? How long do they have to wait before power is given freely to the proletariat and the state withers away? From my perspective, there does not appear to be any light at the end of the tunnel.

this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
1300 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

5491 readers
2979 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS