594
submitted 4 months ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] andyburke@fedia.io 111 points 4 months ago

I feel bad for the reasonable employees at SpaceX - this sucks for decent people.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 85 points 4 months ago

I don't. Look, we already had this discussion years ago. You don't feel bad for the stormtrooper, or their families when you blow up the deathstar. They knew what they were getting into.

[-] bolexforsoup 80 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I’m sure there are plenty of people who started at SpaceX before we all truly knew the monster musk is. Also, the work they are doing is incredibly important. It’s hard to give that up. It shouldn’t be this hard to empathize with people

[-] skyspydude1@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

Knowing many people who've worked for him, you have about 6 months at a MuskCo brand company max before you really know what a piece of shit he is, and either a.) leave ASAP, b.) convince yourself it won't be so bad and hang on for ~2 years, or c.) fall into the cult of personality and believe that Daddy Elon loves his little proles and cares very much about all the hard work you're doing [EMPLOYEE NUMBER HERE].

The absolute last stop on the "Musk is Tony Stark but IRL epic gamer Redditor and likes weed and Rick and Morty!" train was when he called that cave diver a pedophile. It was apparent well before then, but anyone acting like they had no idea what a piece of shit he was after that either didn't hear about it, or was willfully ignorant because they wanted to continue pretending that basing their entire personality around a billionaire wasn't a terrible idea.

[-] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 months ago

I thought that spacex was "incredibly important" once. Now I realize it's a fast track to a more fucked earth. By the time we get to "planet B" "planet A" is going to be a fiery ball of shit.

[-] bolexforsoup 21 points 4 months ago

I’m not saying SpaceX isn’t without valid critiques, but if you don’t see the value of reusable rockets and can’t even give them credit for spearheading that, I’m not sure what else to say. Make no mistake I think Elon Musk is a bigoted piece of shit, but I can also acknowledge that SpaceX has done important work

[-] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 12 points 4 months ago

Yes, the rocket is reusable. The fuel is not, and by lowering the cost per kg of space freight, it has driven more usage of rockets. Which use non-renewable fuel at astounding rates and make huge emissions for a minor payload total.

We’re seeing extreme temperatures and unseasonal weather events already - James Webb is cool and the ISS does need service missions but Starlink is just more orbital trash waiting to happen.

[-] bolexforsoup 11 points 4 months ago

Rocket launches are not why climate change is occurring.

[-] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It’s not helping. We aren’t going to get a “deus ex machina” moment on righting damage done to the environment. Yes focus on the bigger goals and pollution sources, but this is a trend in the wrong way to enlarge Elon’s money pile.

[-] bolexforsoup 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You’re missing the forest for the trees and way over estimating how much pollution rocket launches put out.

We have to leave the planet, which means we need to practice so to speak, and those rockets are the only way we are going to get out there right now. The pollution produced by them is well worth it.

[-] laurelraven 8 points 4 months ago

We need to leave the planet? For where?

For a planet that's completely incapable of sustaining life?

Do you realize that it'll take many, many orders of magnitude more resources, time, and effort to make literally any other celestial body within several years of space flight of us capable of sustaining life than it will be to fix the habitable planet we have right here?

We're not getting off this rock without stabilizing it enough to sustain us long-term first. And by then, we won't need to leave. Either way, though, evacuating isn't a viable solution.

And if you don't believe me, go talk to some biologists.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Starlink will never be orbital trash in any meaningful way. If everything failed today, they'd all deorbit within 5 years. It's only in higher orbits where shit gets stuck for decades or hundreds of years.

[-] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago

Starlink will never be orbital trash in any meaningful way

You're right. They'll be atmospheric pollution. That's what "burn up on reentry" means.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Well in that case, 100% of things that we've launched into space are either

1: Space trash

2: Atmospheric Trash

3: Ocean Trash

Except for the 1st stages of F9 and it's fairings, and one or two first stages of some other small start ups.

Edit: sorry and the shuttle. In retrospect with the amount of refurbishment it required it wasn't really "reusable" per say, but it did avoid being ocean trash.

[-] xthexder@l.sw0.com 4 points 4 months ago

That does seem to be the point this thread is making: Going to space is really bad for Earth's environment. SpaceX and starlink are just accelerating that.

[-] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago

I'd like to see what people's reactions would be if we put all the 6,219 starlink satellites in a pile on the ground and lit them on fire. Would they say "fuck yeah! Fast internet!" or would they say "are you out of your mind?"

And they plan on having 12,000 or something each lasting about 5 years.

[-] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago

Do you know what all those puffy clouds coming out of the engines at engine cut off and start up are? Kerosene or methane and oxygen. Do you know what injecting methane and kerosene into the upper atmosphere does to the planet? No, no one does because it wasn't ever a problem when there were 5 launches a year. Now that there's 5 launches a month we're getting to the find out stage.

Same with starlink. What does aerosolized aluminum (and whatever else is "just burning up" on reentry) do to the upper atmosphere? When there were one or two satellites a year how would you know? Now that there's several a month (20 in the last launch that didn't make it up) we'll find out.

I'm going to go out on a limb and say none of that will prove beneficial to life on earth. But yeah, the rocket is pretty cool.

[-] bolexforsoup 1 points 4 months ago

I am against Starlink just fyi

[-] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

Love the launcher, hate the payload?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] andyburke@fedia.io 50 points 4 months ago

But they didn't. The guy had me in the first half when he cried because Buzz Aldrin didn't like him. Elon wasn't always so obvious with his bullshit. There was a time when he looked minted as a purveyor of a bright future - the mask slipped.

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 50 points 4 months ago

The mask has been off for at least 8 years.

No sympathy for anyone who still stans that phony.

[-] essteeyou@lemmy.world 30 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

When did he call that rescuer a "pedo"? Because that's when I changed my mind on him forever.

Edit: It was June 2018.

[-] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 15 points 4 months ago

Then he fired his PR team not long after that. He pushed out all the people getting paid to help him not look like an idiot.

[-] neoman4426@fedia.io 6 points 4 months ago

Musk should likely have all his storage media searched, just randomly accusing people of things like pedophilia for no reason is often projection, "don't look at me, I clearly can't be one as I'm the most vocal about being against them, look over here instead" or whatever

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

What Elon did was terrible, but it wasn't "for no reason"

The dude attacked him in the media, and Elon is petty and vindictive.

Was the harshness of Elon's response representative of the attack? Absolutely not. But it wasn't nothing.

[-] radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The guy told it like it was. It was a PR stunt and nothing more. His submarine was rigid and stood zero chance of navigating the intricate cave system, of which the caver was an expert. Elon didn't like his sub (and him by extension) being ridiculed, so he used his social media clout to make an unsubstantiated and nigh libelous claim that the guy was a pedophile.

Whatever Elon's retaliatory reasons are for his vindictiveness, a rational person can safely assume that those reasons are tied to his hollow soul and crêpe-paper-thin ego.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] bizarroland@fedia.io 2 points 4 months ago

Yeah see there is a thing called disproportionate response.

If you've got a guy with 100 million followers talking shit about someone else and making wild accusations against them against another person who has practically no following at all, then the response is far too powerful for the issue at hand.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

It was 100% a disproportionate response, I wasn't saying otherwise.

[-] andyburke@fedia.io 9 points 4 months ago

Well, good to know there's no way forward but your way.

[-] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

I mean, the stormtroopers were largely either conscripted, or they were clones who were raised in it. Very few were actual mercenaries or people who had a choice to join or not. I still feel bad for them.

[-] IllNess@infosec.pub 8 points 4 months ago

Stormtroopers is fair. What about maintenance staff?

What about prisoners?

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 6 points 4 months ago

Does Elon Musk profit off slave labor from prisoners?

[-] Irremarkable@fedia.io 10 points 4 months ago

Considering the mining industries for many of the rare earth metals needed? Yeah he does.

Plus there's the whole apartheid emerald slave mine thing, which is how daddy made the money he got to play with.

[-] nulluser@programming.dev 4 points 4 months ago

I don't think any of those people are being relocated to Texas.

[-] Nfamwap@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Lucky for them, eh?

[-] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1z6SFL5fCCg

they built another deathstar right? the first one was completed and fully operational before the rebels destroyed it and the second one was still being built when it was blown up

the first death star was manned by the imperial army only people on board were stormtroopers dignitaries imperials so when they blew it up no problem evil punished

the second time around it was not even done being built yet was still under construction job of that magnitude would require a hell of lot more manpower than the imperial army had to offer

bet they brought in independent contractors in on that thing plumbers aluminum siders roofers

in order to get built quickly and quietly they would hire anyone to do the job you think the average stormtrooper knows how to install a toilet main

all they know is killing in white uniforms

all those innocent contractors brought in to do job are killed casualties of a war they had nothing to do with

alright look you're roofer some juicy government comes your way you got a wife the two kids in suburbia

this is a government contract with all sort of benefits and along come these left wing militants and blast everything in a three mile radius with their lasers

they did not ask for that they had no personal politics they were just trying to scrape out a living

[-] Pieresqi@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

"Innocent contractors"

Wtf 🤮

In my book it doesn't matter if you are building or operating the gas chambers.

[-] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I think Andor settled this fairly definitively.

[-] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 5 points 4 months ago

I'm curious, is it reasonable to blame employees for their employers actions like this? I mean to a certain extent perhaps, depending on your position in the company (like if you are part of upper management then you are more responsible obviously).

Many people are just trying to get by and getting jobs is not easy. Is it okay to blame a person for working somewhere if they don't have much other choice? Capitalism kinda forces you to work within the system like this.

[-] tiredofsametab@kbin.run 2 points 4 months ago

Especially when the job market contracted with all the IT company layoffs, some people may be stuck in jobs they hate because opportunities are few and they'd rather not be homeless or have their kids not have food and so on.

[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 30 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Maybe 5 years ago. They've had plenty of time to see reason and jump ship to anyone else. Elon hasn't exactly been quiet with his escapades...

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

People hate switching jobs.

[-] andyburke@fedia.io 4 points 4 months ago

True, but I don't know everyone's situation.

[-] cupcakezealot 16 points 4 months ago

if you're working at spacex or tesla you're not reasonable.

[-] nulluser@programming.dev 8 points 4 months ago
[-] radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I have always felt Twixxer rolls off the tongue better, so I'm surprised Xitter seems to have gained more traction.

[-] nulluser@programming.dev 3 points 4 months ago

In this narrow case, it's considered proper/correct to pronounce the "x" like an "sh", which greatly improves the tongue rolling.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 8 points 4 months ago

If you're working at one if his companies at this stage you probably already know about his management "style" and you've either already updated your resume or you're just cool with it.

load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
594 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59612 readers
2862 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS