1143
submitted 4 months ago by ooli@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee 108 points 4 months ago

Don't follow much US politics because yous cunts shoehorn it into every fuckin thread about squirrels, dog food or whatever, but why is that lassie not your president? Instead of the two pish-reeking geriatric cunts you've got at the moment

[-] Kalothar@lemmy.ca 63 points 4 months ago

She will not be the minimum age of 35 until next year and this is ineligible to run for the position till 2028

Also, we have a racism and sexism issue in this country so it would be an uphill battle.

[-] HaveYouPaidYourDues@lemmy.world 53 points 4 months ago

She's 35 in October, she is eligible

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 7 points 4 months ago

She wasn't eligible last time around, which is why she couldn't be president now.

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 2 points 4 months ago

We have an election this year in November. A month after her 35th birthday. She could be the nominee instead of Biden.

[-] VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca 52 points 4 months ago

Soooo, there is a minimum age but not a maximum ?

Yet cognitive decline starts way earlier than people are willing to admit !

[-] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago

I'm not even 40 yet, but my brain just glasses over reality and sees whatever it is used to seeing.

[-] Kalothar@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

LMAO, cognitive decline does not begin in your 30s, but yeah I guess so. There is something to be said about intelligence plus life experience.

[-] Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee 16 points 4 months ago

Lol but reading comprehension starts at 4 mate 😅

[-] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yeah, at least as early as 1776

[-] voracitude@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

According to the SCOTUS, being ineligible for the Presidency isn't a barrier, to running or winning. So I say bring on AOC as the nominee instead of Biden!

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 37 points 4 months ago

why is that lassie not your president?

She needs to be about a century older, white, male, sell out to corporations, and shed her sense of ethics.

Then maybe, if the GOP is running enough of a Nazi.

[-] tenchiken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago

Corp and ethics are the big ones, otherwise you get Bernie lol

[-] ooli@lemmy.world 25 points 4 months ago

I find somehow telling that US got a black president before it get (if it even go there) a woman president

[-] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

It's pretty consistent. Black men got the right to vote long before women too. The US has more deep rooted misogyny than racism, and it's got plenty of racism.

[-] nomous@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

Blew my mind when I found out women couldn't have their own bank accounts in the United states until 1974.

[-] ImADifferentBird 18 points 4 months ago

Technically, she wasn't old enough to run until this year.

More practically, we have a center-right party and a fascist party in this country. The center-right party has a few actual leftists in it, but they tend not to gain much power.

[-] cupcakezealot 14 points 4 months ago

lassie not your president

lassie for president and larry the cat for prime minister 2024

[-] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago

Lassie is useless. Lassie warns others about danger AFTER it happens. Perfect politician

[-] JDCAce@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

At least Lassie isn't the one causing the danger.

I hope...

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 11 points 4 months ago

A large chunk of the US is deeply sexist on top of other intellectual and moral failings.

This is aggravated by the right wing fighting against education, especially when it benefits the general public.

[-] Xtallll 8 points 4 months ago

Because as president you serve 4-8 years and then become generally irrelevant. In congress you can serve for decades.

[-] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I've always wondered why this is? In our country a previous prime minister remains highly relevant and politically active until they retire, even if that is long after they were in the position. The leader of the current largest opposition party was prime minister for eight years before losing the previous election, and is set to be the opposition's front runner for PM in the next election in not too long.

Like, why didn't e.g. Obama run for a position on the senate after finishing his second term as president? He's definitely still young enough, even in countries where you don't need to be a fossil to have political power.

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago

Soooo, a LOT of people on the right hate her… even more than Bernie.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

She’s too young. Like by law. Next election she’ll be old enough to run

[-] homura1650@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

The age requirement applies at inauguration. AOC is old enough to run this cycle by a few months.

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
1143 points (100.0% liked)

News

23275 readers
3633 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS