461
submitted 4 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Jericho_One@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago

Assuming you mean the US:

The highest number of gun violence deaths of any developed country 😂🤣🤣🤣

The highest number of children killed as well 😂🤣🤣🤣

The number one killer of children being guns 😂🤣🤣🤣

Yeah, the numbers are definitely NOT in our favor 🤦

[-] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

How does any of that relate to most gun owners being responsible people? Folks really suck with trying to ignore the absolute numbers and try to use relative comparisons to serve as justification.

The VAST majority of gun owners are responsible and never experience anything like this. Using parents who left their toddler in the car buying fireworks at night is an absurd representation of your average gun owner. Gun owners like this are the exception and the numbers aren't hard, you're talking about less than a hundredth of the percent of the population.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Most people are responsible drivers. Doesn't change that we enforce speed limits.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Most people are responsible drivers.

While this may be true, it's still safe to drive as though everyone is a dangerous stupid lunatic. Not everyone lets you know by owning an Altima.

[-] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I completely agree. Thank you for agreeing on the responsibility. Can you find a single statement in this thread where I state anything about the laws or enforcement? My point is simple and limited and you and this entire thread have thrown the entire gun debate team at me.

Gun violence should be reduced, national consistent laws should be put in place, background checks should be consistent and thorough.

Most gun owners are responsible.

These are not mutually exclusive ideas.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yeah sure I agree with all that. Frankly, and saying this as a former rural Appalachian Republican who owned firearms, I think we should go the UK route and effectively ban them altogether. I think I can make a compelling argument that they (a) do not make people safer, (b) do not defend against tyranny, and therefore (c) yield an overall net-negative to society. To me the crux of the issue isn't the "responsible" gun-owners, but rather the ones who do fall through the cracks; for there are enough of them who have a serious impact of our nation's bottom-line.

[-] Jericho_One@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

The fact that the number one killer of children in the US is guns?

You are asking me how that fact relates to responsible gun ownership?

Think really hard about how those children were killed by those guns, and maybe you can figure it out.

The children who died by guns are either:

  1. Killing themselves, meaning that an irresponsible gun owner gave that child access to a gun, either deliberately or not deliberately. Irresponsible!

  2. Being killed by the owner of the gun. This one should be self explanatory. It's irresponsible to use the gun you own to kill a child.

  3. Killed by someone with access to someone else's gun. Again, whoever owned this gun was irresponsible enough to allow their weapon to be accessed by someone else to kill children.

You can't be this naive.

[-] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

No it's not relevant to the argument that most gun owners are responsible. Well it is, only in the sense that it proves it. Even the worst country in the world is overwhelmingly responsible even you consider population size.

[-] Jericho_One@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

I think you misunderstand.

It's not important that many gun owners don't end up allowing their guns to be used to kill children. Your argument is miniscule, inconsequential, and not helpful to the sickness in the US society.

It is important, tantamount, and very relevant that because the US has so many guns, that the leading cause of death to children are the guns.

Idgaf about most gun owners, I care about reducing the number of children being killed.

Why don't you care about reducing the number of children killed by guns?

[-] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

No, I think you misunderstand and want to turn this into a debate about guns when I made a simple statement. Most gun owners are responsible. Most gun owners never experience gun violence because of irresponsible gun owners. To say our imply most gun owners are irresponsible is a lie.

If you didn't give a fuck about him owners you shouldn't have run your mouth with false information to my very simple and scooped statement which has nothing to do with the point you are trying to make.

[-] Jericho_One@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

No, I think you misunderstood, and want to turn a very important debate into a pedantic point about sheer ratios without wider context.

Increased gun ownership has been repeatedly shown to increase gun violence. That's a fact. To say that it's "responsible" to increase or even maintain the levels of gun ownership is false.

To say or imply that most gun ownership is responsible is like saying that most cigarette smoking is responsible...except when you consider every fucking horrible ill it wreaks upon society.

You shouldn't run your mouth with false information that is so "very simple and scooped", because that misses the entire fucking point.

Be less simple, simpleton.

[-] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago
[-] nomous@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

These clowns will pray to take your guns and call you stupid for owning them while fretting about Trump and his cult seizing power and banning LGBTQ+ folks from existing.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

And right up until yesterday you would have said the same thing about these idiots while fighting tooth and nail to let them keep their guns.

All gun owners are presumed responsible right up until something like this happens.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

And right up until yesterday you would have said the same thing about these idiots while fighting tooth and nail to let them keep their guns.

What makes you think they still don't?

[-] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

No, I would have said I didn't have a clue about these individuals. I would take as many bets as you'd offer on a randomized selection of gun owners. I take that bet all day.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

How does any of that relate to most gun owners being responsible people?

Or irresponsible people who haven't encountered consequences yet.

[-] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Potentially, but that implies leaving guns around outside of safes around kids isn't all that dangerous considering the high number of gun owner and guns.

I don't believe that's the case. I think it is more likely a few idiots cause a majority of the pain and loss of life.

I have no data on this but anecdotally I can honestly say I despite being around idiots and gun owners in rural country with my now trump loving mother, that I have not met 1 single person even remotely close to dumb enough to leave a 2 year old in a car in the summer of GA, unbuckled and free to roam the car, that has a unlocked loaded gun.

I understand the challenge with using personal experience, but in the absence of any real data, this is what I have to work with.

this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
461 points (100.0% liked)

News

23387 readers
2819 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS