37
submitted 3 months ago by NoSuchAgency@lemdro.id to c/news@lemmy.world

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution joins the New York Times in calling for President Biden to exit the 2024 race after last week's debate.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

The NYT editorial board is definitely right leaning.

[-] NoSuchAgency@lemdro.id 1 points 3 months ago

is the new york times a liberal or conservative paper

The New York Times is often perceived as a liberal or progressive newspaper, but its political stance is more complex and nuanced. Here’s a breakdown:

Historical context: The Times was founded as a conservative newspaper in 1851, and it maintained a conservative editorial stance until the early 20th century. However, during the 1960s and 1970s, the paper began to shift towards a more liberal perspective, reflecting the changing values and attitudes of the time.
Editorial board: The New York Times’s editorial board has historically been liberal, but not uniformly so. While it has supported progressive causes, such as women’s suffrage, civil rights, and environmental protection, it has also endorsed conservative candidates and policies on occasion.
Columnists and opinion writers: The Times features a range of opinion writers and columnists, including liberal voices like Paul Krugman, Maureen Dowd, and Charles Blow, as well as conservative voices like Bret Stephens and David Brooks. This diversity of opinion reflects the paper’s commitment to presenting a range of perspectives.
Coverage and reporting: The Times is known for its in-depth reporting and investigative journalism, which often focuses on issues like government corruption, corporate malfeasance, and social justice. While this coverage can be seen as liberal-leaning, it is also driven by a commitment to fact-based reporting and a desire to hold those in power accountable.
Subscriber demographics: According to Vox, The New York Times’s subscribers skew “older, richer, whiter, and more liberal” than the general population of the United States. This may contribute to the perception that the paper is liberal, but it’s essential to note that the paper’s editorial stance is not solely determined by its subscriber demographics.

In conclusion, while The New York Times has a liberal bent, it is not a uniformly liberal or conservative paper. Its editorial stance is shaped by a complex interplay of historical context, editorial board perspectives, and the diverse range of voices and opinions presented in its pages. ----Brave Search

[-] SnotFlickerman 21 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Man, maybe you're getting downvoted hard because you're busy using an AI to do your fucking thinking for you instead of digging up relevant information yourself to prove it.

Nice attempt at sidestepping how often they capitulate to Republican administrations.

[-] NoSuchAgency@lemdro.id 2 points 3 months ago

I'm getting downvoted because it doesn't fit their narrative. I don't care about that though. It's expected

[-] SnotFlickerman 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

lmao narrative

Jesus Christ get a grip.

I guess the NYT definitely didn't hype us up for war in Afghanistan and Iraq. Nope, never.

The NYT never breathlessly repeated the accusations of Weapons of Mass Destruction without questioning their sources as to the validity of those claims, yup.

You gotta be fucking shitting me.

EDIT: https://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/26/world/from-the-editors-the-times-and-iraq.html

The NYT outright admitting they just sold the entire country lies for the Bush admin.

[-] NoSuchAgency@lemdro.id 1 points 3 months ago

Find something that's less than 20 years old. That's such a dumb argument anyway. 99% of the news agencies in America at that time wanted to go to war. Everyone wanted revenge for what had happened.

[-] shaiatan@midwest.social 15 points 3 months ago

An account that echoes right-wing talking points in most of their posts doesn't have room to complain about "narrative"

[-] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

No, it’s because you structure your points into dog shit. Narrative aside…. Your argument is terribly weak and everyone is far too busy to donate their free time as a pittance to you getting a clue.

Signed - someone with a normal level of perception

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Yes it is nuanced. Their editorial board is still right leaning if not on the right.

this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
37 points (100.0% liked)

News

23207 readers
2942 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS