1684
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 103 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Fake money for criminals only because it was useful for me when I wanted to buy drugs while living in a place with little access to them

[-] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 66 points 5 months ago

It's especially funny since criminal enterprises have used "legal" currency since its invention. It's almost like criminals are gonna criminal, regardless of the "tender". ๐ŸคŒ๐Ÿฝ

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 10 points 5 months ago

The weed and lsd were to this day the best I have had too. I don't love crypto currencies for many many reasons but it has been years and I still think about those trips

[-] Laser@feddit.de 19 points 5 months ago

Cryptocurrency with Tor has unironically done more for drug safety than most administrations worldwide. I hate the framing "fake money for criminals" because while there are despicable crimes, not all of them use cryptocurrency, in fact USD was the most common last time I checked, OTOH what constitutes a criminal can be an arbitrary rule. Woman in Texas having an abortion paying with crypto? Fits the definition but I'm not sure people here would condemn it.

I'm not happy with how cryptocurrency turned out with the huge speculational bubble, NFTs, not even a huge fan of smart contracts but I think the idea of a decentralized and maybe even anonymous ledger is very much in the spirit of the fediverse.

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 11 points 5 months ago

I'm gonna pile on the "not happy" side with environmental concerns. You see, with Bitcoin, if crypto mining was as easy as just verifying the next block in the chain, it would be easy and the market would flood. You'd have hyperinflation. The system controls the rate at which new bitcoins are minted by artificially increasing the computational difficulty of the problem. And the end result is that crypto mining intentionally wastes power output comparable to that of a country.

[-] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

the whole Blockchain could be run by two raspberry pis, and the cap is still limited to 21million. I suspect you don't know what you're talking about

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 months ago

It could be. I explained why it isn't. Why don't you offer an alternative hypothesis for why so much power is used?

[-] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

it's used because because more machines areining than 2 raspberry pis

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

Well, thanks for agreeing with me

[-] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

three raspberry pis would also use more power than 2. it doesn't mean that Bitcoin is designed to waste power. it means people are willing to spend energy on mining

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

But it could be done with 2. The third one is spending power for no common good.

[-] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

not for a common good, but the other two can hardly be said to be altruistic either.

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

Exactly, it's a system where everyone running the infrastructure is a greedy dick

[-] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

this is true of any other commodity extraction operation, though. lumbering, mining, fishing...

[-] sep@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Calling hashing "mining" was probably the most stupid thing in bitcoin. Since it have nothing to do with minting new coins. It is tru that miners get a bonus in addition to the fees of the block when successful. But that bonus is reduced regularly and will eventually go away.
The power consumption used by hashing became quickly insane by companies chaseing a quick buck.

[-] Zealousideal_Fox900@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Crypto massively helped me when the banks wanted 45 bucks for an international transfer for my buddy to send me money for something I made him. Fuck banks

[-] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

That's not even touching on the glaring fact that this anti-crypto sentiment is propped up by those who stand to benefit from downplaying its utility - until they've got all their plans ready to fire, of course. The same is true of cannabis these days, and (for those that read) was the same for alcohol only a little while ago, and tobacco before that. There is nothing in this current timeline that will be allowed to attack the economic power dynamic, much less correct it. This hype is as much a pre-packaged and deftly engineered product as the military-sports complex is, but where is the conversation on that, citizens? ๐Ÿคท๐Ÿฝโ€โ™‚๏ธ

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

"legal" currency

Are you goldbug?

[-] jeffreyosborne@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

For now... ๐Ÿ–•๐Ÿฝ They worded that so weasely, they're just waiting for the storm to pass and for Legal to come up with some compelling reason why they're totally "obligated" to make it happen, "hands tied" "so sorry" and all that.

Fuck Sony. They made this SOP way back when, and there's no way they let this stop them forever. It's all about profit, not what "we" want.๐ŸคŒ๐Ÿฟ

this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
1684 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

5793 readers
2466 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS