343
Positively bizarre to praise racist far-right theocrats
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
343 points (100.0% liked)
Political Memes
9136 readers
1328 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Explain the absolute takes on the Russian war by Jeremy Corbin and Noam Chomsky. They have encouraged Ukraine to surrender, which is tacit approval of Russia's invasion by giving Russia everything that they ever asked for
Explain Hassan shilling for Hamas
Show me where Corbyn and Chomsky has said this.
Here's Corbyn doing his job as a Russian asset trying to stop the flow of weapons into Ukraine
https://twitter.com/brianklaas/status/1554360196935335936
Neither of those say what you say they said....
Corbin says he encourages "peace" efforts rather than war efforts, which you know duh everybody does.
Chompsky is similar, why or rather now are you twisting either of those in your head to mean something else?
What the actual fuck? War efforts are what's needed. Because you know, people are dying because of Russian bombs. It's shooting back that saves lives. Defending their viewpoints is basically tacit approval of wars of aggression.
Notice I didn't take a stance I simply stated that what you said that article contained is not in fact the truth.
People who advocate for peace with Russia are in fact advocating for Ukrainian surrender. That's because Russia's condition IS surrender. If they had more modest goals, that would be one thing
Again notice how I didn't take a stance I just said you're a liar. Address having zero credibility at this point first and go from there.
You did take a stance, but you're trying to hide it to appear to be neutral. Which you're not, because you can't see that they are actually supporting Russia by saying Ukraine has the choice to surrender
You can read anything however you'd like, point to where in plain English I took a stance.
I'll wait dumb dumb.
Here's what I typed...
Did you misunderstand, perhaps? Here's what I absolutely did not say...
Is any of this getting through to you?
https://twitter.com/achkhikvadze/status/1786879477919649927
He is just saying Ukraine can't win so it has to accept Russia's terms (which are basically surrendering its sovereignty)
I guess it's just a pure coincidence that it's now perfectly clear that Ukraine can't win, eh?
Ukraine actually can't lose as long as it has the support of the free world
You mean the grifter? He knows what he is doing. And he is doing this on purpose.