1162
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hark@lemmy.world 52 points 4 months ago

Hey democrats, try plugging the hole.

[-] theareciboincident@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

This is honestly the perfect microcosm of liberal thought. Just continuously posting low effort shitposts that literally state in the meme how ineffective and in-bed with fascists liberals are.

We have OP coming into the comments acting like a holier than thou liberal, repeating the same vapid bullshit over and over.

Meanwhile, Democrats just keep dumping one little bucket at a time as the boat gets lower and lower while screaming in tears at the guy trying to find the fucking life raft.

“And fuck no, I’m not voting for you in November”

Liberals in fucking hysterics throwing a tantrum about why leftists comprising 1% of the vote don’t like their blue MAGA instead of targeting the 60% republican vote with actual popular policy

Lmao fuck liberals, y’all deserve to lose.

“There is no genocide in Gaza”

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 22 points 4 months ago

It's the over-the-top sarcasm and insincere indignation that galls me

Then they'll inevitably try claiming that yea, it'd be nice if we had someone with better politics but NOW'S NOT THE TIME TO MAKE A FUSS

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

insincere indignation

Yeah, how dare those uppity minorities get agitated over the prospect of becoming legally second-class citizens or outright murdered. If only we knew our place, quietly accepting the Principled Stand of the Privileged in our honor!

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 14 points 4 months ago
[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Yeah, I've never denied the sarcasm. Sorry that you find tone policing more important than genocide.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 16 points 4 months ago

Idk really seems like a stretch too suggest your impassioned defenses of the guy supporting the genocide is an indication of your outrage

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

"Wow, I don't understand how you can defend the guy who doesn't want to commit genocide in the US, and is less gung-ho about the ongoing genocide in Gaza than the opposition?"

It's weird. I know, I should apparently support all genocide, everywhere, as often as possible, to be a good leftist according to these new standards, but for some reason, I keep gravitating towards the "Let's not start up death camps in the US and run sorties over the West Bank and ensure as many Ukrainians are murdered as possible" option.

Very strange, I know, seemingly incomprehensible to the Very Serious Leftist Brigade here on Lemmy.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 13 points 4 months ago

What's strange is that the totally-different-and-very-cool party keeps finding themselves in situations wherein they're totally forced into committing atrocities themselves, but end up being OK because somehow there's someone worse right behind them

And it's never actually their fault because there's just too many people who support their totally unavoidable atrocities and if they don't do them they'll lose to the totally-worse-and-different monster party

And the people who totally oppose the atrocities have no choice but to support the party conducting the atrocities because if they don't, more atrocities will be done by the totally different and bad party and maybe actually against them and not the faceless foreigners they can forget about

So strange

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

What’s strange is that the totally-different-and-very-cool party keeps finding themselves in situations wherein they’re totally forced into committing atrocities themselves, but end up being OK because somehow there’s someone worse right behind them

Yes, definitely, what's going on is the Democratic Party decided to commit atrocities out of the blue. This definitely isn't a long-standing US policy that was, until very recently, widely supported on all sides of the electorate. Wow, it's a good thing politics are something simple that Manicheans with short attention spans can learn by half-paying attention to news reels for a month, otherwise we'd really be fucked, wouldn't we?

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 8 points 4 months ago

And it's never actually their fault because there's just too many people who support their totally unavoidable atrocities and if they don't do them they'll lose to the totally-worse-and-different monster party

This definitely isn't a long-standing US policy that was, until very recently, widely supported on all sides of the electorate.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Sorry that the idea of democracy reflecting the opinions of the majority is so alien to you. I understand autocracy might be more your speed.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 9 points 4 months ago

So it's acceptable to support genocide as long as it's a majority opinion? Are we morally relativistic now? It's that what's happening?

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

I'm sorry, do you think that candidates for election should be supporting opinions that the majority opposes? Is that where we're at? The point of democracy is to reflect the will of the people; if you don't like the will of the people, it's your job, as a dissenter, to try to change it. The idea that candidates in a democratic system should be running on platforms that say "To hell with what the people think" is some really absurd Soviet style shite.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 9 points 4 months ago

The point of democracy is to reflect the will of the people; if you don't like the will of the people, it's your job, as a dissenter, to try to change it.

Oh my god were so close buddy, let's bring it home

What's the correct course of action for dissenters? I'm doubting that it's whipping votes for the candidate you're dissenting against but you seem like an expert so I'll ask you

The idea that candidates in a democratic system should be running on platforms that say "To hell with what the people think" is some really absurd Soviet style shite.

So you're saying supporting the Palestinian genocide is the will of the people, and as such Biden should continue doing it? Is that the real take here? Was the disgust with genocide the fake indignation I thought it was?

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

What’s the correct course of action for dissenters?

Protest, for one. Which is ongoing.

I’m doubting that it’s whipping votes for the candidate you’re dissenting against but you seem like an expert so I’ll ask you

Haven't we already been over this? Limited choices, mass support, lesser evil, all that jazz?

So you’re saying supporting the Palestinian genocide is the will of the people, and as such Biden should continue doing it? Is that the real take here? Was the disgust with genocide the fake indignation I thought it was?

No, I'm saying that support for the Palestinian genocide remains widespread, and thus the idea that a politician with a realistic-but-narrow-shot at being elected should suddenly, and without consultation of popular opinion, reverse the stance, or else you'll vote for the one who wants MORE genocide, is deeply unserious at best. As voters in the minority, we cannot realistically expect our opinions to be represented by candidates who must win the vote of the majority.

I would be deeply upset at the prospect of voting for someone who thought that gay rights didn't matter, but if you ask me who to vote for in 1948, I'm sure as shit not going to make any decision that puts Strom Thurmond in office no matter how badly I want to make a protest vote.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Protest, for one. Which is ongoing.

In your opinion, what does protest look like? Is it flowery parades, or are they loud and threatening? It's there an implication of disobedience, or is it accompanied by the reassurance that you'll still support them if the protest fails?

Haven't we already been over this? Limited choices, mass support, lesser evil, all that jazz?

I'm not talking about how you're actually voting, I'm talking about what you're doing right now.

No, I'm saying that support for the Palestinian genocide remains widespread, and thus the idea that a politician with a realistic-but-narrow-shot at being elected should suddenly, and without consultation of popular opinion, reverse the stance, or else you'll vote for the one who wants MORE genocide, is deeply unserious at best

A- were not talking about voting for the opposition, we're talking about not supporting Biden, and while I realize that's the same thing to you it is not the same thing to tens of millions of infrequent or undecided voters who will sooner not vote for Biden than vote for Trump

B- I think the suggestion that Biden's stance on israel has ever been based on popular opinion is itself deeply unserious, but it also makes Biden himself seem deeply unserious for doing something so goddamn depraved just because he thinks it'll make him more popular.

I have zero expectation that my opinion will be represented by Biden or the dems, but not because I think they're unpopular (they're not) or because I withhold my vote (it won't). But I expect that by highlighting the depravity of electoral bullshit I might create enough discontent that one or two people get off their ass and join a socialist organization, and that's worth it.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago

Yes, yes, we get it, you find the idea of American minorities being murdered thrilling, and support all the aid to Israel Trump can muster. You can stop crowing about it from the top of every roof.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago

Are we forgetting that biden is currently the president and loves genocide so much that he refuses to stop supporting it, even though it's costing him votes? If the best you can offer is "not the other guy" then all you're telling us is that things will get worse no matter what.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

If the best you can offer is “not the other guy” then all you’re telling us is that things will get worse no matter what.

Oh, okay, I didn't realize the protection of minority rights was 'things getting worse', thanks for the self-report, I guess.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

I guess you love genocide. Thanks for the self-report.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

I guess you love genocide

For trying to stop as much of it as possible? Weird definition of love, but considering you spend all your time working towards ensuring as many Palestinians are killed as possible, I shouldn't be surprised.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 13 points 4 months ago

'It's literally impossible for Biden to stop supporting the genocide'

Oh fuck I had no idea

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

It is, for all reasonable intents and purposes, that someone other than Biden or Trump is going to win the election, an untimely death or other health crisis excluded. Thus, you are choosing between the two. Refusing to choose is saying that you support whichever of them wins.

But hey, don't let me take away from your excitement at seeing more Palestinians dead under a Trump regime, to say nothing of American minorities (but fuck them anyway, right?)

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 14 points 4 months ago

Maybe if you vote hard enough Biden will hear about it and decide to reward your effort by trying to stop it himself

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Maybe if you vote third party hard enough, Trump will decide you're One Of The Good Ones, and let you sit on his lap as you livestream the genocide in the West Bank together.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Sending billions in weapons and denying any genocide is going on is a funny way of trying to stop genocide.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

I didn't realize I had billions in weapons to send, or that I was denying the ongoing genocide in Gaza. Thanks for teaching me so much about myself. Without white leftists to tell me what to think, I don't know what I'd do.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

You're being intentionally obtuse. We were talking about biden but you changed the subject to yourself because you somehow think feigning stupidity is a great argument tactic.

Also, you're assuming my race, and incorrectly at that. Regardless, why don't you try listening to the many Arab Americans on this issue or are they too white for you? In reality, you're just bringing up minorities as a shield for your support for genocide. Honestly it's disgusting.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

We were talking about biden

Yes, and what will happen if Biden loses. Genocide. Which you don't give a fuck about.

Regardless, why don’t you try listening to the many Arab Americans on this issue or are they too white for you?

I have. This may surprise you, but Arab Americans are not a monolith marching lockstep with your plan to see as many American minorities killed as possible.

In reality, you’re just bringing up minorities as a shield for your support for genocide. Honestly it’s disgusting.

How dare I bring up my own life as a shield to defend the awful crime of [checks notes] seeing as few people murdered as possible.

If I were truly enlightened, I would be calling for as many minorities to be murdered as possible, and for fascists to be put in power. Apparently, that's what True Leftism(tm) consists of, according to the geniuses on here.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

Yes, and what will happen if Biden loses. Genocide. Which you don’t give a fuck about.

What is happening right now? That's right, genocide, which you don't care about because you refuse to accept the possibility of ending it. So not only are you jumping around subjects, you're projecting.

I have. This may surprise you, but Arab Americans are not a monolith marching lockstep with your plan to see as many American minorities killed as possible.

You'll find the proportion of Arab Americans supporting genocide rather low. In fact, that would be the case with all races, but you're the one who brought up race in the first place, treating minorities as a monolith to suit your needs. There you go projecting again.

How dare I bring up my own life as a shield to defend the awful crime of [checks notes] seeing as few people murdered as possible.

If I were truly enlightened, I would be calling for as many minorities to be murdered as possible, and for fascists to be put in power. Apparently, that’s what True Leftism™ consists of, according to the geniuses on here.

You know what would result in the fewest people murdered as possible? Not supporting genocide. Ah, but the truly enlightened liberal must enjoy genocide every once in a while, as a treat.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

What is happening right now? That’s right, genocide, which you don’t care about because you refuse to accept the possibility of ending it.

"You don't care about genocide because you want the less genocide-supporting option to win"

Bold move of me, here I thought if I wanted more genocide, I would ensure that the MORE genocide-supporting option succeeded, like you are.

You’ll find the proportion of Arab Americans supporting genocide rather low.

And what about the proportion of Arab Americans voting Biden, since that's what's at hand?

You know what would result in the fewest people murdered as possible? Not supporting genocide.

Oh, cool, which of the two realistic options for president is going to do that?

Oh? Neither, so you're going to acquiesce to the one who wants to do as much genocide as possible?

Damn, I didn't realize genocide was left praxis now.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

It seems the idea of stopping genocide is too much for your big liberal brain to handle. Instead we have to guarantee votes to someone who full-throatedly supports genocide, denies it's happening, and is deep throating the far-right netanyahu. Of course, liberals helping fascists is actual liberal praxis.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

lmao, imagine working to get the candidate who Netanyahu openly adores elected, and thinking you're working against him. Big brain moment, simping for the Israeli far-right while pretending to be leftist.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

So netanyahu adores trump and biden adores netanyahu. Scratch a liberal and a fascist bleeds

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

and biden adores netanyahu.

lol

[-] hark@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

If he doesn't then why did he get so mad when the ICC called for his arrest? Why does he supply him with billions in weapons to carry out his campaign of genocide? Why does he deny genocide in defense of him?

[-] protist@mander.xyz 13 points 4 months ago
[-] TunaCowboy@lemmy.world 34 points 4 months ago

A bit of false hope, a dash of inaction, sprinkle in some corpo lobbyist dong sucking, and top it off with a "at least we're not the other guy".

I'm voting democrat, because at least they're not the other guy, but this meme is fucking bullshit.

[-] Saljid@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Looks like there's a Republican

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

They've pledged to plug it over the course of the next 20 years.

[-] daltotron@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Shit, perhaps? Perhaps the shit sandwiches which we have all packed for lunch, apparently?

[-] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

theyll never agree on how to plug it. might start putting more holes in to spite the other

this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
1162 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

5238 readers
1710 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS