1363
submitted 1 year ago by UhBell@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago
[-] projectd@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Worth noting that many non-vegans are vitamin deficient and some medical authorities, including the UK's, even recommend that everyone take vitamin D supplements. Also, please reconsider using your Internet connection, that isn't very natural either.

[-] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

as I said to the other guy, I'm not saying not natural is bad. But what op is implying is that getting the same stuff from natural sources is bad. That I just don't agree with. It's just the natural order of things. I have other options, yes, but I don't consider the default natural source of things to be bad, so I don't feel the need to switch. Animals eat animals all the time. And they don't do it "humanely" either.

[-] irmoz@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Animals don't have the options we do. That argument fails.

Plus, that argument could be used to justify rape and murder. Perfectly natural. They don't breed humanely.

[-] Kushia@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

What if the animals just ate plants instead?

[-] projectd@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Herbivores must, carnivores must not, omnivores with very high level thinking and moral agency is fortunate enough to choose.

[-] Kushia@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

So there isn't the right nutrition available in plants to sustain every animal?

[-] projectd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, I'm pretty sure a lion would die if he tried eating only plants, while I'd imagine a cow would die on a meat diet. I'm less well versed on non-human animal diets though, as I've never needed to give it a lot of thought.

I do know that humans can be very strong, fit and healthy on a plant-based diet, as confirmed by the world's medical institutions, and demonstrated by vegan athletes of all types.

[-] irmoz@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

No one said every animal, just humans

[-] m532@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Those factory farmed animals are further away from "natural" than a smartphone

[-] projectd@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Why is it worse to get things from less natural sources? Ignoring that everybody get some of their vitamins from less natural sources, e.g. animals injected with B12, cereals fortified with iron, water and toothpaste with fluoride, synthesised morphines instead of smoking opium - would you say these things are bad too because they are less natural? And if so, why?

Also, do you take all of your moral code from the worst things animals do? I hold myself to a higher standard and don't eat my kids, rape, or fling shit at each others.

[-] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

never said it was worse. what I did say is it's not better either

[-] projectd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Well fantastic - best to go for the one with the least impact to the environment and suffering then!

To make one redundant point, a nice thing about the less natural sourcing of things is that exact dosages can be measured during synethesis - so when tree bark is swapped out for aspirin, opium for morphine etc. you can get reliable, pure dosages for medicine. I don't think that's really very important for vitamins of course.

[-] Azzu@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

Cyanide occurs naturally. Water can be made in a lab by mixing Hydrogen and Oxygen and applying heat.

Is Cyanide good for you when occurring naturally and water bad for you when artificially synthesized?

[-] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

no. But it is also not the case that nature intended for us to consume artificially synthesized anything

[-] Azathoth@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago

Natural is such a stupid argument. Is it natural for us to use a smartphone? Sit in a car and drive around? Work 8h a day instead of being with your peer group? Breed a fast growing special kind of animal, feed it with chemical ingredients and plants that don't grow here only to eat them? Eat processed sugar? I think you get where I am going. Stop using this bullshit argument and take some supplements, your body will thank you.

[-] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not saying that supplements are bad. What I am saying is that getting those things from their original source is not bad either. And no argument will get me to see it as such. You can have your supplements, it doesn't affect me. But I will not feel guilty of doing what nature always intended me to do: i.e. eat stuff

[-] Vegoon@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago

You eat others who have been feed the same unnatural supplements and much more. Nothing about the Animal industry is natural (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy) But I guess you live in the woods and only spear hunt there?

Animal industry is the biggest destroyer of nature and not only kills them but in the long run us too.

[-] 4ce@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

nature intended

Nature doesn't intend anything, it simply is. We are, in the grand scheme of things, not separate from nature, and in this sense everything we do is natural. If you're using "natural" to distinguish things from the results of human civilization, then eating animal products stemming from animal agriculture is just as "unnatural" as supplements, as both are products of civilization.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Are you a nudist?

this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
1363 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45601 readers
1973 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS