439

WASHINGTON (AP) — The federal judge in Florida presiding over the classified documents prosecution of former President Donald Trump has canceled the May 20 trial date, postponing it indefinitely.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

It does kind of make sense since the same lawyers and the same defendant are stuck in a criminal trial in New York until June.

It's not like they can apparate between New York and Florida.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 65 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If only Trump had some kind of way to travel across the country to the places he wants to or is required to be......

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Doesn't work if you need to be in two places at the same time.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 40 points 2 years ago

EXACTLY! And I'm SURE if a Poor Criminal did so many Crimes they were needed in multiple court rooms at the same time the courts would do the EXACT SAME THING!

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Actually, yeah, they pretty much do.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heath_v._Alabama#Facts_and_procedural_history

Note, that's charging in two different states for the same crime and the courts went in order.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Fortunately these are different cases but you didn’t care about that when you made a bad faith argument.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Technically, in that case, they were different cases as well which is why double jeopardy was not in play.

[-] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Remind us all again, which other state is charging him for stealing classified documents

[-] stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub 31 points 2 years ago

The mental gymnastics are unreal

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

It's not gymnastics.

In a criminal case, presence is mandatory.

So how do you expect a criminal defendant to appear in two different courthouses at the same time?

Let's finish the NY trial, then he can go on trial somewhere else while waiting on sentencing in NY.

Court #2 can give him a release to attend sentencing then work with that prison system so he can appear in court #2.

Estimates are the NY case should be wrapped up somewhere around the first week in June.

[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Presence is possible just like campaigning is and hanging out at races. Which one should go first when one is facing multiple trials?

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Campaigning and hanging out at races is being done when court is not in session.

If the Florida court demanded he be present at 8 AM on 5/20, and the NY court was in session that day which would ALSO demand his presence, there's literally no way to do that.

He, and his lawyers, can't be running one case in person and running another remotely. That's not going to work.

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Can't do the time don't do the crime

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Do you practice law in federal court? Not trying to be an asshole, I'm really asking.

I've worked misdemeanors and felonies in a trial court and in both instances, remote appearances were allowed except when the party is testifying. Frankly it sounds fucking ridiculous that they would be forced to show up for anything but trial considering how unlikely it is that Trump does time before sentencing.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Remote appearances are definitely allowed, just not simultaneously in two courtrooms.

[-] baru@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

The case could've been held and be done with. There was assignment across the various cases. This judge delayed on purpose. Delayed while not freeing up the planned time this case would be held. Thereby trying to mess up the planning of other cases.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

You probably shouldn’t commit crimes in multiple venues if you don’t want to travel to them for court.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

He’s got a giant airplane with his name painted in the side. I’m sure he could figure something out.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

That's not going to help him if both courts are in session on the same day, at the same time.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I’m sure they can schedule court sessions day to day. Sub ideal, but it can be done. Doesn’t require months of separation

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

lol people who aren’t Trump have this happen but you wouldn’t care about that

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

People who aren't Trump don't have to appear in two courtrooms at the same time either because it's not physically possible.

Say you have a doctors appointment at 8 AM on a Thursday and a 2nd doctor also wants you at the same day and time. One of them HAS to re-schedule.

Except in this case, blowing off one of the two appointments would carry a criminal penalty.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

You’re wrong. You could be forced to appear in two. Stop trying to make him a victim.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

You can be forced to be in two courts BUT NOT AT THE EXACT SAME TIME.

You can't simultaneously appear before judges in both New York and Florida. Time/Space does not work that way.

[-] baru@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Again, the judge purposely made it that the cases would overlap. This could've been done with already. Initially there wasn't any overlap. If you check the actions by this judge it's pretty easy to see that she is delaying plus trying to make it difficult for his other cases to be scheduled.

this post was submitted on 07 May 2024
439 points (100.0% liked)

News

36201 readers
2335 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS