339
submitted 6 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Cheng “Charlie” Saephan, who was born in Laos and immigrated to the U.S. in 1994, plans to split the money with a friend and find himself a "good doctor."

One of the winners of a $1.3 billion Powerball jackpot this month is an immigrant from Laos who has had cancer for eight years and had his latest chemotherapy treatment last week.

Cheng “Charlie” Saephan, 46, of Portland, told a news conference held by the Oregon Lottery on Monday that he and his 37-year-old wife, Duanpen, would split the prize evenly with a friend. Laiza Chao, 55, of the Portland suburb of Milwaukie, had chipped in $100 to buy a batch of tickets with them. They are taking a lump sum payment, $422 million after taxes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 61 points 6 months ago

He only gets like 400m of that though, wouldn't it be nice if we taxed billionaires and corporations like we taxed lottery winners so people with cancer could just get good doctors instead of being effectively sentenced to death for not being rich enough?

[-] callouscomic@lemm.ee 38 points 6 months ago

His hospital now: "Well would you look at that. Your treatment is suddenly $200 million. Man, that sucks. I'm sorry."

[-] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I mean, $400 million is plenty.

I was listening to an episode of the Dollop where the children of two rich families, when they got married, were given the modern equivalent of $6.5 million to spend on their three month honeymoon.

I did some basic, conservative math. If given $6.5 million, I could very comfortably live the rest of my life. Keep the $500k liquid and invest the $6mil even in very safe investments like treasury bonds or bills, and live on the interest.

If $6.5 million is enough to live comfortably on, $400 million is more than enough.

Edit: So sorry downvoters, I did a poor job responding here. I only replied to the “he only got $400 million” part and I didn't spell out that I agree that billionaires shouldn't exist and should be taxed heavily, so I can see where you might've thought I wasn't properly anti-billionaire by only responding to one part of the post.

Just to make it clear, fuck billionaires. I feel like that could've been inferred by saying one could comfortably live a life of luxury off $6.5 mil, but I can understand the confusion.

[-] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 months ago

You're right, billionaires should probably just get taxed out of existence, that's more money that anyone could ever need even if they lived dozens of lifetimes.

[-] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I agree 100%. Nothing I said in my post was meant to disagree with that part.

[-] acetanilide@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Idk I spent the entire billion in my head the other day and got quite mad when I realized I wouldn't even get half of it.

this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
339 points (100.0% liked)

News

23284 readers
3430 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS