968
submitted 9 months ago by sverit@feddit.de to c/technology@lemmy.world

The US Department of Justice and 16 state and district attorneys general accused Apple of operating an illegal monopoly in the smartphone market in a new antitrust lawsuit. The DOJ and states are accusing Apple of driving up prices for consumers and developers at the expense of making users more reliant on its iPhones.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] UristMcHolland@lemmy.world 248 points 9 months ago

I don't hate Apple but I do hate their influence. They release some wireless earbuds and then suddenly all the manufacturers "don't have enough room for a headphone jack", ...get the fuck out of here.

[-] lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de 101 points 9 months ago

i'm still angry about their initiatives on delicate phone bodies and non-removable batteries.

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 41 points 9 months ago
[-] r_se_random@sh.itjust.works 28 points 9 months ago

Ehh, that's ok. Slide out keyboards aside, having an on-display keyboard is a better idea by and large.

[-] my_hat_stinks@programming.dev 26 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

A keyboard without tactile feedback is objectively worse than a keyboard with tactile feedback, excluding other factors.

I've never had a physical keyboard lag out then send an entirely different keystroke because it thought I held a button, or send a single keystroke because I was typing too quickly.

I've never had to wait a moment for a physical keyboard to show up after selecting a text box.

I've never had the entire layout of a page shift to make room for a physical keyboard whenever I select or deselect a text box.

I've never had a physical keyboard prevent me from using the number pad and force me to use the full keyboard (or worse, vice versa) because of an improperly configured input box.

The way I see it there are exactly two real benefits to integrating a software keyboard into a touchscreen: reduced physical complexity (the entire device is essentially just one screen), and easier access to emoji. A touchscreen keyboard performs far worse as a keyboard. It's a valid trade-off for a small mobile device, but it's not objectively better.

[-] r_se_random@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago

A keyboard is not just to enter text It can do a multitude of things like emojis. Good luck remembering all the mappings on a physical one, or you end up with having them eat screen space. Might not be your use case, but a vast majority of the world uses it.

Additionally, this increases the overall screen real estate. Aside for sliding keyboards (which I did add a caveat for in my original comment), a physical keyboard would be in the way for most of the usage an average person makes on the phone, like watching videos, looking at pictures.

A physical keyboard would probably weight more as well (this is just a guess, based on the idea the membrane, and additional circuitry required for a keyboard would be more than the weight of a glass panel).

A physical keyboard adds an additional point of failure on your device as well.

I'm not saying virtual keyboards are perfect. Like any other thing, there are trade offs to make. But in the form factor phones work in, a virtual keyboard makes more sense according to me. The best of both worlds would probably be a sliding keyboard, but that does add more weight to the device.

[-] namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev 4 points 9 months ago

There's room for both in my opinion. Keyboards are good for accuracy. Touchscreens are good for custom inputs and slightly faster to type on. In an ideal world, we'd have both.

To be frank, I find touchscreens so abhorrently useless that I just use my phone less than I'd like to - for example, I'm much more likely to just flat out ignore messages because of how tedious input is on phones. I don't know if a keyboard would make a huge difference for me since I think mobile devices are garbage in more ways than one, but the lack of a keyboard is by far the biggest issue.

[-] Balthazar@sopuli.xyz 3 points 9 months ago

To add, I personally have had all of the complaints of digital keyboards happen to physical ones. Just not the removal of the numpad. The others, wordt of which is lag, Ive had plenty. Input lag IS THE WORST.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

I've never had a physical keyboard prevent me from using the number pad and force me to use the full keyboard (or worse, vice versa) because of an improperly configured input box.

It’s all I can do not to contact the web admin when this happens! Two days ago I used a form where the first box was set correctly and the second wasn’t. (Also how about when a site tells your password manager to input the p/w in the email field, uhg.)

I've never had the entire layout of a page shift to make room for a physical keyboard whenever I select or deselect a text box.

Pretty rare, no?

I've never had a physical keyboard lag out then send an entirely different keystroke because it thought I held a button, or send a single keystroke because I was typing too quickly.

Might’ve seen that twice in the past year.

I've never had to wait a moment for a physical keyboard to show up after selecting a text box.

Interesting, just checked and I suppose I kind of wait a millisecond but it’s essentially imperceptible. (Have a pretty new flagship phone.)

Gotta check reviews on the Clicks now that I think it’s been out a couple months:

[-] daltotron@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Yeah, but I like physical keyboards because they're cool, and non-physical keyboards are lame. They reduce my hardware experience to a joyless, abstracted, sterile experience, where I don't have the ability to click any buttons, turn any knobs, flip any hinges. Then, on top of that, the software experience also ends up being standardized and sterile.

It is more practically efficient, sure. But I like the inefficiency. It's like driving a stick-shift, it's less convenient, but the tactility and inconvenience, the physicality, makes the object more real, less confined to cyberspace. I am forced to become a more conscious driver, I can't drink a drink while I drive, or drive one-handed. Old phones are like portable games consoles. New phones are magic mirrors that steal your soul.

There's also probably something to be said that there's a sort of two-way causal relationship, where the phones becoming more practical devices enables more reliance upon them, and phones becoming more practical devices is driven by a need from private interests to make these devices more reliable and frictionless. More joyless. Cars used to be a simple toy and a fool's replacement for the horse and buggy. In many ways, I would've much preferred if they had remained confined to that use case, rather than evolving to take over american civic infrastructure and life.

It's sort of like, dwarf fortress has an appeal, not just in playing the "game", right, not just in doing the things in the game, but also in memorizing the layouts and how to interface with the horrible UI, where it makes you feel smart for understanding how to parse it, even if in reality it's a fairly useless skill, and it's not actually that complicated.

[-] Metacortechs@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago
[-] daltotron@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

no, why do you ask?

[-] Morefan@retrolemmy.com 7 points 9 months ago

Not all phones have gone to the dark side - https://www.fxtec.com

[-] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

Deliberately degrading picture quality when the metadata says it's from a competitor to push the narrative that they have the best cameras is also pretty low. Points for the sheer audacity, though.

[-] pycorax@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Wait is there actually proof of this? That's pretty damning.

[-] olympicyes@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

The proof is the status quo. Video texts from Android users look bad on an iPhone. Apple could choose to fall back to RCS instead of SMS from iMessage. RCS would offer better video quality than SMS, which overall improves the interoperability of all phones. Because RCS is a standard and the natural successor to SMS, refusing to support the standard makes it less likely to succeed, with the intent of defending their dominant market share.

[-] pycorax@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

While I agree with you, this isn't as outright as I though it would be though. Apple fan boys could very easily just handwave this away. Frankly I don't live in the US so no one here uses iMessage anyways so I don't really have any examples I have seen or could use to show people.

[-] WhataburgerSr@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

Vote with your wallet.

I'm one of the few people that use my headphone jack with Grado headphones and have had Motorola phones so I can listen to music the way I want.

Don't even get me started on the light green bubble shit.

Fuck Apple.

[-] exothermic@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago
[-] lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 9 months ago

the 3.5mm rounded hole where you can insert your wired earphones, wired headphones, or stereo speakers

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago
[-] rikonium@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 9 months ago

An iPad Pro, specifically

[-] exothermic@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Oh, that thing is garbage. I prefer the 6.35mm RGA jacks for superior hi fidelity quality. It’s a shame they don’t make phones with those.

[-] trolololol@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Hey guys look, I found a troll! Please don't feed them.

[-] exothermic@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

How dare. 6.35mm is superior and I for one want it on my phone. The larger jack size provides a greater surface area for conductance. Why is this important? Glad you asked, more surface area translates to less resistance at the junction, thus allowing more electrons to flow freely from your device to your ocular cavity, where sound is processed from compression waves into electromagnetic waves. The 6.35mm jack is the best option for hi-fi 256 bit color. As you can see, it’s all basic science. Source: I’m a stientist

[-] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

That’s not Apple, that’s the free market. Samsung touted wired headphones and a headphone jack and the market still showed they wanted wireless.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago

But we had wireless headphones already. The choice to have both was nice. Not being able to charge and use headphones sucks. Also tiny e waste pods with tiny non recyclable batteries are terrible for the environment compared to a wired pair when thrown in a landfill.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 15 points 9 months ago

No it's definitely Apple.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago

and the market still showed they wanted wireless

Or maybe people just need phones and there are only like 3 actual options.

[-] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

That’s simply not true. Have you been in a mobile phone store recently? There’s far more than 3 brands of phone let alone 3 models per brand.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Actually it coincided with IPX rating for smartphones. The last headphone jack smartphones did not have water resistance, but the newer models did. People voted for a more sealed phone with their wallets.

These days you can get both, but my phone has a 3.5mm jack and NO ipx rating that I could find

[-] gian@lemmy.grys.it 20 points 9 months ago

Actually it coincided with IPX rating for smartphones. The last headphone jack smartphones did not have water resistance, but the newer models did. People voted for a more sealed phone with their wallets.

My rugged phone is IP68 but it has Usb C connector and SIM/SD tray, so adding a headphone jack while having an IPX rating seems not impossible.

[-] SpiderShoeCult@sopuli.xyz 9 points 9 months ago

My phone has IP68 with an usb-c and headphone jack, and the SIM/SD tray. Not a rugged phone though.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

It's not impossible, they just didn't do it back then so we ended up in the situation we are in now. By the way, the DAC in my phone is low quality, so I hear popping and distortion when I play

http://plasticity.szynalski.com/

at the same time, my phone doesn't do output to a DAC through USB because it already has a 3.5mm port, so I can't use something higher quality

[-] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

I don't think DAC is reason behind popping and distortion. Probably shit power circuit or amplifier.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

It's both, because I hear little bells in the background even at low volume. An IEM is very sensitive so needs very little power, the amplifier will perform worse as it needs to output more power.

In fact when I use over ears, it sounds better because I increase the device volume which increases the input voltage

Anyway, the $9 Apple dongle blows my phone's 3.5mm jack out of the water. My tablet and desktop have the same issue, but when I connect the same devices to my ancient laptop they sound perfect.

The point is the 3.5mm jack actually gets me worse sound quality because my phone doesn't output audio to usb, so I only use it with my TWS. Which, by the way, also sound like crap in the same game, but it might just be Bluetooth issues

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

People voted for a more sealed phone with their wallets.

LOL imagine if capitalism actually worked this way...

Edit: People seem to be missing the point. I am aware that phones with 3.5mm jacks exist. I also just understand that capitalism and "free markets" don't actually work the way people seem to think they do. Maybe if the headphone jack was the most important feature to people, it would do better. Or maybe if it was an mp3 player and not a phone. Or maybe, simply, if it was manufactured by a brand people have heard of. Sometimes it's literally that simple.

But that isn't the case, is it?

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

There are still phones with 3.5mm jacks and they are not the best selling models

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago

Maybe people aren't spending $500-$1200 on a device just because it has a headphone jack. Like that's anyone's top concern.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Zen phone 10 has everything you need and a 3.5mm jack

Why isn't it outselling the rest of them?

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Are you asking me to explain microeconomics to you? Ask 100 people in the US if they've ever heard of Zen Phone, and 99 will tell you no.

And, again, that's nobody's top concern. Maybe if it was an mp3 player, rather than a phone, whether or not it has a headphone jack would be higher up on the priority list.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Alpha71@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

Then why can they waterproof the usb plug-in but not the headphone jack?

[-] guacupado@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

But how is that Apple's fault? Weird argument.

[-] sjmarf@sh.itjust.works 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

OC isn't claiming that the shift in the industry is solely Apple's fault:

I don’t hate Apple but I do hate their influence

The reality is that what OC said is exactly what happened. Apple removed the headphone jack to coerce people into buying AirPods. Everyone else released their own wireless earbuds to compete, and also removes their headphone jacks for the same reason.

this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
968 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

60354 readers
4190 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS