1375
submitted 9 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 79 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Look, we all know he didn't off himself, but here's my issue with these stories where a friend or family member says that the person said they told them it won't be suicide:

If Barnett really said that, why not also set up a dead man's switch? If he was truly afraid that he had info so damming he'd be killed for it, then why not set it up so that the info still finds a way to come out even in the event of his death?

If anything, ensuring the info comes out one way or another might have even protected him.

[-] anton 139 points 9 months ago

He already published his information and was in the process of repeating it in front of a court.
His death prevented him from giving his information as sworn testimony which a dead man switch could not do.

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 42 points 9 months ago

Well because according to his quote he wasn't afraid. I don't think he thought the company he worked for for 30 years would do this. Seems he said this remark only in response to what she asked.

[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago

It just takes one psycho in management with their own ass on the line to do something insane to cover their tracks.

[-] PutangInaMo@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

That's my thought if this conspiracy were true. It wasn't some evil corporation assassinating the guy, it was one of the menial workers who had more to lose from his testimony.

[-] Gabu@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

"Hurr durr, it wasn't the evil corporation. It was just the evil lackey of the evil corporation".

[-] PutangInaMo@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah because there's a difference..

[-] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Not only that, but isn't a dying declaration specifically admissible as fact or something? I'm only vaguely recollecting this, so I'm likely wrong.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Yeah something is clicking in my head about it being a federal level hearsay exception. Where is a lawyer when you need one?

[-] obsolete@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 9 months ago

Maybe his family was threatened?

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Someone on lemmy said it yesterday. Those Boeing shits could have put him in a no-win. Tell him that if he drops it they will still sue him and if he continues they will also sue.

[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 1 points 9 months ago

This was my thought. As terrible as it is.

Basically "We have a van outside your house. You have two options..."

Man, wish they could've gone into witness protection and testified from an undisclosed remote location or something...

[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 6 points 9 months ago

It would have been really nice to have some kind of automated testimony upload or something.

Have it in writing. "I have zero intention of killing myself and my life is great save for my horrendous former employer that should go straight to hell."

ANYTHING more substantial than "Y'know he told me once..."

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Unless it really was suicide via blackmail/ extortion.

If you don't kill yourself were going to kill all your family and friends.

Give him videos of the surveillance on all of them to scare him.

Still seems more likely they did kill him, but that might be a reason for no Deadman switch

I'd wanna be in witness protection and unreachable if I was whistle-blower at that level just to avoid situations like that.

[-] blazera@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

how many dead man switches have you setup?

this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2024
1375 points (100.0% liked)

News

23600 readers
3007 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS