581
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Diotima@kbin.social 85 points 8 months ago

Probably the most relevant line in the entire article:

a series of polls have suggested Biden will narrowly beat Trump in the November vote. But with eight months to go, and the polls so tight, this could change and a number of polls have also indicated that Trump will win the election.

Whether Biden wins or loses is going to come down to how well he engages people in key states. Outside of the "blue no matter who" crowd, people have decidedly mixed feelings about voting for a candidate whose strongest argument is that he isn't Trump. Everything from events in the weeks leading up to the election to the weather (which affects Dems more than Reps) will matter, so rather than leaning on polls that suggest a victory... it might be wise to end those behaviors and policies that have human rights advocates concerned.

[-] SparrowRanjitScaur@lemmy.world 44 points 8 months ago

I don't get this point. I feel like Biden's done a great job as president so far. He's had a lot of tough issues to deal with as president and so far he's handled everything really well.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

it might be wise to end those behaviors and policies that have human rights advocates concerned.

I don’t get this point.

Don't play stupid; you know exactly what the grandparent commenter is talking about.

[-] SparrowRanjitScaur@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I understand that it was about the Israel/Hamas conflict. And I understand that many people disagree with the US supporting Israel and the way things have played out so far in Gaza. I wish the US would not get involved in conflicts in that region, but to me a single international policy isn't enough to negate all of the good that I feel Biden has done during his presidency. I also believe that any Israelis that have committed war crimes should be held accountable.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 7 points 8 months ago

Also, it's extremely stupid to say "I don't like how this person is handling the situation, so I will trust the person who wants to make it worse"

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-israel-gaza-finish-problem-rcna141905

[-] Diotima@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago

Or you know, vote for someone who wouldn't support it in the first place...which you could do if the DNC didn't collude with fascists to keep alternative voices silenced.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 4 points 8 months ago

Ranked choice voting would also fix it

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Ranked choice voting would also fix it

This. Be sure to ask every elected official you've ever see about this, bring it to the forefront of their consciousness.

[-] Diotima@kbin.social 4 points 8 months ago

Reducing a systematic campaign of ethnic cleansing to an "international policy" is gross.

[-] Diotima@kbin.social 4 points 8 months ago

It's interesting how wilfully ignorant people get when the data doesn't support their candidate. I should be angry, but at this point it's become so comical that I have to laugh.

[-] SparrowRanjitScaur@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago
[-] Diotima@kbin.social 7 points 8 months ago

So ethnic cleansing and support thereof is now reduced to "a policy?" That's a big oof.

Biden mishandled COVID, has slowly re-enacted some of Trump's worst policies on immigration, abandoned those who, at no small risk to themselves, supported us in Afghan, has presided over a massive increase in the cost of housing... and I guess, on the bright side, forgave a fraction of a percent of the student loans he said he'd forgive.

Maybe it's time to support someone who doesn't have the blood of countless innocents on his hands.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Here's some other things Biden did to fuck over the progressive and leftist voters who helped him win the 2020 general election:

Called on congress to block the rail strike: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/biden-calls-on-congress-to-block-potential-railroad-strike
Walks back his own campaign promise for $50k forgiveness: https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/539139-biden-balks-at-50k-student-loan-forgiveness-plan/
Goes around congress to sell weapons to Israel: https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/29/politics/biden-congress-israel-military-aid/index.html
Forced federal workers back to office: https://www.cnn.com/2023/04/13/politics/in-person-work-biden-administration/index.html
Increased the defense budget: https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/28/politics/defense-budget-biden-administration/index.html

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 3 points 8 months ago

Maybe it's time to support someone who doesn't have the blood of countless innocents on his hands.

Does this include forcing R to kick out Trump too?

[-] Diotima@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago

If it were up to me, I would see the Republican party dismantled. Were I a member, I would vote for it's dissolution. But thing is, they can nominate whoever they like, including a fascist psychopath. That he's second most likely to win is a direct result of GOP and DNC collusion.

[-] retrieval4558@mander.xyz 17 points 8 months ago

He's done an OK job for a run of the mill president during run of the mill times, but in my opinion he has failed to rise to the big threats of today, especially RAPIDLY encroaching fascism, climate change, and nearly catastrophic wealth inequality.

[-] CatfishSushi@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago

So our choice is between run-of-the-mill president or a guy who says he wants to a dictator, violently tried to overturn the last election, had fake electors etc. etc.

I'm not excited about Biden but the choice seems to be pretty straightforward and I'll be SURE to get to the polls.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

I’m not excited about Biden but the choice seems to be pretty straightforward and I’ll be SURE to get to the polls.

I will be getting to the polls as well but it won't be to reward Moderates for picking a shit candidate and threatening not to back him every time there's an opportunity for him to compromise with leftists and progressives.

[-] Eccitaze@yiffit.net 2 points 7 months ago

Trump will make sure to thank you for your efforts getting him elected.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

When moderates are ready to compromise I'll be here. We've done our part, it's time for them to hold up their end of the bargain.

[-] retrieval4558@mander.xyz 4 points 8 months ago

I'm on board with voting for him as a means of harm reduction but I'm also not gonna pretend he's been great like a lot of blue maga liberals claim.

[-] retrieval4558@mander.xyz 3 points 7 months ago

Lol the downvotes. I said I'm voting for the guy, but y'all are so mad that I'm not going to dickride him as well.

[-] Eccitaze@yiffit.net 2 points 7 months ago

Meh, I upvoted you. I personally think he's been about as good a president as someone could hope for, which is a pretty fucking low bar, but I still voted uncommitted in my primary yesterday even though I would crawl over broken glass to vote against Trump in November. I don't blame anybody who holds their nose and votes as a pure harm reduction measure.

[-] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

The president has little power to address climate change/wealth inequality on his own. That all relates to the budget and is firmly in control of congress. Replace Manchin/Sinema with two progressive senators and you would have the BBB bill, which would have addressed both these concerns.

With respect to encroaching racism I am just not sure what any politician can do about it. Ideally, you would like to change the mind of hardcore Republicans, but it’s not like they are listening.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Democrats could have used the reconciliation bill in order to pass the BBB but they didn't.

Tells me all I need to know about establishment Democrats: they're not on my side.

[-] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

What part about Manchin/Sinema is difficult to understand here? How does that relate to Biden who pushed the bill?

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Manchin/Sinema could not have stopped Democrats from using the reconciliation bill as a bargaining chip to pass the BBB. It was not called for by Pelosi, Biden or any establishment Democrat for one simple reason: They didn't care and expected voters to just show up anyway.

[-] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

What are you talking about? They needed 50 votes in the Senate for a reconciliation vote which they did not have, because of the aforementioned senators. The bill was passed by the house (of which Pelosi was Speaker at the time). There was a lot of negotiation between the White House and the two senators to get the bill to 50 in the Senate. None of what you are saying is correct!

[-] retrieval4558@mander.xyz 1 points 8 months ago

I'm relatively unconvinced by laying all the blame on them. The president is the leader of his party and has the massive power of the bully pulpit to help bring them into line. He was unable or unwilling to do that.

[-] Atyno@dmv.social 3 points 7 months ago

Question: what party is Sinema in now?

It's pretty evident now Sinema could not be bullied if she was willing to immolate her career over even the soft demands made of her.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

And if he had used that "power" then he'd be called a bully, etc, (including by people who don't give a shit when R does it)

[-] retrieval4558@mander.xyz 1 points 7 months ago

Better not try then, that is the democrats MO after all

[-] retrieval4558@mander.xyz 2 points 8 months ago

Encroaching *fascism. I agree there's probably not much to do about racism.

[-] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

Most underrated President of all time. (Best president of my time at least).

I will donate the closer it gets and to the key races.

[-] Diotima@kbin.social 6 points 8 months ago

Objectively, he has been a mediocre president whose most impressive victories have stemmed from the fact that the economy was already recovering from a worldwide pandemic. His handling of the withdrawl from Afghanistan was an appalling travesty that got countless innocents killed, his two-faced positions on Gaza (lamenting the human rights abuses while cutting aid and supplying weapons,) the fact that the interest rate for home loans has skyrocketed in an already difficult to afford housing market, and quite honestly, his racist and homophobic past make him difficult to swallow.

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

I agree but not everyone votes because of these things. It's 8 months away. Lots of stuff can come out from today until then to change a voter's mind. They could literally vote for whatever they feel matters.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Lots of stuff can come out from today until then to change a voter’s mind.

Yes lots of stuff could but we all know Biden won't do those things. He's demonstrated zero regard for the opinions of people who helped him get elected in the 2020 general.

[-] juicy@lemmy.today 3 points 8 months ago

Tell me you don't care about genocide without saying you don't care about genocide

[-] Thirdborne@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago

It's going to depend on the severity of several pending scandals and what the Saudis decide to do with oil prices between now and November. Democrats should have an astronomical campaign warchest while the GOP is blowing their wad on the candidate's legal bills. The Democrats game to lose and that's their expertise.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

it strikes me that congress might have authority under the 14th amendment to ban winner-take-all apportionment of electors and gerrymandering

this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
581 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3837 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS