140
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by jordanlund@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Tonight, Thursday, March 7th, is the State of the Union Address so lets keep everything related to it (including the Republican response) confined to this thread.

This is probably one of the most important speeches Biden can give this year. He has to come across as "Present", not just "President".

This will set the tone for the campaign the rest of the year and will be second only to the Democratic Convention speech in August for visibility.

Watch it live here:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/state-of-the-union-2024/

Or through your favorite news source.

The Republican response will be delivered by Senator Katie Britt of Alabama:

https://www.npr.org/2024/03/07/1236338784/katie-britt-alabama-republican-biden-state-of-the-union

Very good speech!

Full transcript is here:

https://time.com/6898705/read-president-joe-bidens-2024-state-of-the-union-address-full-transcript/

Republican response from Katie Britt here:

https://www.britt.senate.gov/press-releases/u-s-senator-katie-britt-responds-to-president-bidens-state-of-the-union-address/

I encourage you to watch the video and not just read the transcript. Reading it doesn't carry just how breathless and borderline weepy her delivery is.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

It's just dumb campaign promises that he cannot and will not deliver on. If he could do any of this he would have already done it

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 25 points 8 months ago

That's why he said, "Give me a congress that will work with me." Its not just the president. You need to get people into office who will do these things.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

....

Did you forget the Georgia runoffs?

Biden got elected because he claimed he could get Senate republicans to vote with Dems.

After the GA runoffs, we end up with a 50/50 senate with the VP as tiebreaker. And the House.

For two years.

And Biden literally said he couldn't change anyone's mind so it would be a waste of time if he tried.

That happened.

Recently.

So, how much does Biden need in 2028?

And why isn't he out there campaigning for himself and down ballot races?

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 18 points 8 months ago

Manchin and Sinema say, "Hi!"

No change to the fillabster means shit gets stalled.

Elect people who will shitcan the fillabster.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

So, how much does Biden need in 2028?

You think the result would be different with 52 Ds?

There's a lot more people that will vote against progress in office. But they're not all going to say it if they don't have to.

But the point is Biden said he could work with a Republican majority. And wouldn't try to change Manchin and Sinemas minds when they're his own party.

He literally made statements that he couldn't so he wouldn't try.

Elect people who will shitcan the fillabster.

We do that by replacing incumbents. We need primaries to do that, and we have to fight against a shit ton of donor money, but we can do it.

As long as we keep having primaries. NH is already out of that...

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

That's why he said, "Give me a congress that will work with me."

Because no such congress can exist? Either there's a Republican majority in at least one chamber and nothing gets done, or there's a Democratic majority in both chambers that finds just enough no votes in the senate.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

It's what could get done if Republicans got the fuck out of the way.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Well yeah, none of it will get done, and he will blame the guy behind him, and the other guy who is holding his strings.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago
this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
140 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19097 readers
2596 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS