140
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by jordanlund@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Tonight, Thursday, March 7th, is the State of the Union Address so lets keep everything related to it (including the Republican response) confined to this thread.

This is probably one of the most important speeches Biden can give this year. He has to come across as "Present", not just "President".

This will set the tone for the campaign the rest of the year and will be second only to the Democratic Convention speech in August for visibility.

Watch it live here:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/state-of-the-union-2024/

Or through your favorite news source.

The Republican response will be delivered by Senator Katie Britt of Alabama:

https://www.npr.org/2024/03/07/1236338784/katie-britt-alabama-republican-biden-state-of-the-union

Very good speech!

Full transcript is here:

https://time.com/6898705/read-president-joe-bidens-2024-state-of-the-union-address-full-transcript/

Republican response from Katie Britt here:

https://www.britt.senate.gov/press-releases/u-s-senator-katie-britt-responds-to-president-bidens-state-of-the-union-address/

I encourage you to watch the video and not just read the transcript. Reading it doesn't carry just how breathless and borderline weepy her delivery is.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 55 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

In my mind, the best bit was at the very end... it's not about the age of the candidate, it's about the age of the ideas, and fear and hate are some of the oldest ideas of mankind.

"My fellow Americans, the issue facing our nation isn’t how old we are, it’s how old our ideas are.

Hate, anger, revenge, retribution are among the oldest of ideas. 

But you can’t lead America with ancient ideas that only take us back. 

To lead America, the land of possibilities, you need a vision for the future of what America can and should be. "

[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 33 points 8 months ago

Listening to him work the floor now, he knows everyone and has something to tell them about the thing they care about. Its impressive.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 33 points 8 months ago

It's almost like he's been doing this for a while and has experience. Such a breath of fresh air after four years of that other guy.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

Biden's ideas are pretty ancient themselves. But he's not wrong. Fuck anyone who vilifies the poor and minorities. Biden likely won't accomplish much to reduce poverty or help the average person. But he likely won't make any of that demonstrably worse ether. And honestly he's been way better than many imagined he would. Shitty Israel policy not withstanding. Thank goodness he's finally taking small steps to balance out his fuck ups.

I have some big hopes for 2028 if we're still holding elections. Hopefully some fresh young blood will be ready to run. Like Ocasio-Cortez after almost a decade in the house. But to get there I can't deny Biden is the path forward for now.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 12 points 8 months ago

God damn. What an ending. Thats some legacy shit right there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 39 points 8 months ago

Dude is sharp, it's no comparison really between Biden and the "look having nuclear guy". Im done giving the people "worried" about Bidens mind the time of day.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 35 points 8 months ago

Before this speech, I wondered how he'd deal with the predictable topics he'd be attacked on. I didn't expect him to be the one to bring them all up himself. Baller move.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 35 points 8 months ago

He's baiting them to shout out so he can smack them back down, and they're dumb enough to keep falling for it.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

Over and over and over again! Those clips are going to get played on repeat.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

Pretty good way to show that he's mentally sharp and on top of it. Republicans just destroyed their own talking point.

[-] bigfoot@lemm.ee 27 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It's not just a good speech for Biden, this is the best SOTU I've ever heard.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I really wish Biden would've turned around to Mike Johnson when he was talking about January 6th and ask, "what's the matter with you, man? Why aren't you clapping? So you support a fascist takeover? Of course you do.."

Also turn around and say, 'it's this man here who is blocking aid to Ukraine while women and children die in Ukraine"

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 21 points 8 months ago

Dude, he was squirming hard in that chair lmao.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

Love it, but I say twist the blade lol.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 23 points 8 months ago

Biden knocked this fucker out of the park.

Bona-fide 500 foot grand slam blast over the center field wall.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 22 points 8 months ago

So I get in my car, and i'm listening to the beat on MSNBC, and a reporter is saying that she was talking with a bunch of young voters, especially young black voters.

Basically, they think that they've already been through a Trump presidency, and it's not gonna be any different from the first time. Oh boy, could they not be more wrong. Apparently, they haven't heard about project 2025, or they think it's nothing big that 20,000 fascists are itching to take over government roles in the next Trump White House.

[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago

Maybe I am dumb but... I am genuinely starting to think many people are fundamentally incapable of imagining complex, abstract potential outcomes (like allowing Trump back in office).

I always assumed envisioning such things was easy, instant, and obvious for nearly everyone.

Several years ago I started noticing a couple of people make decisions that to me seemed insane and later they were surprised by the outcome that I saw coming a mile away.

And I started wondering, could this ability to imagine how things will turn out be much rarer than I ever imagined?

I genuinely don't know for sure. Not like I have a ton of conversations with different people let alone ones about cognitive abilities lol.

Like, I didn't even realize some people can't see images in their heads or don't have an inner monologue (think by "talking to themselves" using language) until fairly recently and I'm in my 50s.

Surely anyone can imagine some vague idea of what happens if they jump in front of a speeding bus. That's simple. Surely you can at least conceptualize that you'll be run into and injured or killed. Maybe even imagine it with some internal video of your body being run over by giant bus tires or being flung from the impact and landing in a crumbled bleeding mess. Nothing complicated there.

But is it actually impossible for some to imagine the many ways Trump and the Project 2025 people are going to fuck up everything?

That would certainly explain the bafflingly cavalier reactions to cybersecurity vulnerabilities I've seen over the years. Or the shrugging off of egregious privacy issues.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 22 points 8 months ago

Lmao. Led them into the Social Security trap again

[-] spongebue@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

EVERY trap! And they're acting as if they haven't learned their lesson a year or even a few minutes earlier

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago

If y'all didn't see Biden's reaction to Marjorie when he walked in, you NEED to see it! I laughed so hard! Even she tried not to laugh.

https://x.com/timjhogan/status/1765945203867746548?s=20

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

The look that says "Wow! Y'all come in the SAME clown car or just you?" 🤡

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 20 points 8 months ago

Wow! He is not pulling any punches lmao. Mike is squirming in his chair behind him.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 17 points 8 months ago

He should come out to Sabotage by the Beasties Boys. Liven shit up a bit.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

This is just genuinely a great speech.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Aaaaand here's the Republican response...

2 sentences in and she sounds like she's going to cry.

[-] spongebue@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

Her: "I'm a mom"

Her constituents: "Rub it in, why dontcha?"

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

He is utterly manhandling the Republicans.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

This Republican Response Senator Katie Britt is unhinged. This is like watching a bad Lifetime TV D-list actor.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 14 points 8 months ago

What was that fool yelling lol.

Also I don't think I've ever seen anyone get kicked out of the State of the Union lmao

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

Katie Britt has the acting skills of a 6th grader. That shit was weak and phony as fuck.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

Regardless of age, Biden knows how to work a crowd.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

I almost feel bad for Katie Britt having to follow this.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

Bet he moves to the right to try to get Haley voters.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
140 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19097 readers
2671 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS