637
submitted 8 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The group left in a U-Haul box truck that was driven out of the county, police said, indicating the demonstrators were outsiders.

A small group of neo-Nazis marched in downtown Nashville, Tennessee, on Saturday, drawing a few vocal opponents and ultimately leaving following a "challenge," police said.

The demonstrators, all men, wore red, long-sleeve T-shirts and black pants, and some carried black Nazi flags, according to verified social media video from the scene.

"Neo-Nazi demonstrators ... carried flags with swastikas, walked around the Capitol and parts of downtown Saturday afternoon," Nashville police said in a statement.

No arrests were reported, and the group left in a U-Haul box truck that ultimately exited greater Nashville, police said, indicating the demonstrators may have been from out of town.

"Some persons on Broadway challenged the group, most of whom wore face coverings," the department said. "The group headed to a U-Haul box truck, got in, and departed Davidson County."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 109 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Police doing police shit: "They drove away ... indicating that we think they were outsiders." Uhauls can be rented and picked up anywhere. Pigs won't lift a finger to stop nazis.

[-] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 76 points 8 months ago

It's gonna be awkward at home and at work when they arrest people they know.

[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 33 points 8 months ago

You forgot about when they get together in the social club later.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

"It's just a prank bro!"

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

It's not their job, our constitution protects nazi protestors the same way it protects climate protestors. The right to assembly.

Confronting these things is our job, as citizens. Not the police's job. If they weren't causing any trouble, then the police are supposed to let them be, for better or for worse.

[-] nottelling@lemmy.world 58 points 8 months ago

I think the thing in this case is that it is the job of police to pull over a box truck full of human cargo. The implication here is so you think they'd have let a truck they knew was full of immigrants just drive away?

[-] brlemworld@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

Right, they didn't have seat belts, they should get tickets.

[-] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 8 months ago

not just tickets but checked for outstanding warrants and plain ol' pressured to ID themselves before being allowed to leave

JUST LIKE THE COPS DO TO LIBERALS PROTESTING

[-] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 8 months ago

They would at the least be booked on charges that will obviously not stick, so that there face and name becomes public data and they get added to lists by political rivals. This was the MO throughout 2020, there were several popular twitter accounts that would just post the mugshots and names of people arrested, the majority of which weren't charged or often weren't even part of the protest but ended up doxxed and harrassed by chuds.

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago
[-] LinkOpensChest_wav 2 points 8 months ago

They'd never let a truck that that drive away, or one that was filled with climate activists. It's clear these Nazis got special treatment from the cops. ACAB.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 35 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It's not cops job to pull over dozens of people not following traffic laws like wearing a seatbelt?

Sure seems like it's literally their job, but they just didn't want to do it when it Nazis. Wonder why that is?

[-] key@lemmy.keychat.org 7 points 8 months ago

TN only requires seat belts for driver and front seat passengers. It's even perfectly legal to ride in a truck bed on a highway.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago

If they weren’t causing any trouble, then the police are supposed to let them be, for better or for worse.

It's neat that this is a consideration now that it benefits nazis.

[-] TurtleJoe@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

It has always been this way.

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

You're almost there. Yes their primary role is to protect capital interests through systemic oppression. They selectively enforce certain laws over others.

They will beat down peaceful leftist and progressive demonstrations through the enforcement of petty law breaking like jay walking. I've been witness to this. They could do this here but they choose not to because capitalism requires systemic racism.

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Their primary role is whatever the local governance makes it. There is no universal set of regulations governing local police. Though we might need some.

Additionally, what one person witnesses and attests to is not a sound basis for making policy decisions.

All that said, I do agree that leftist protestors frequently get treated more harshly than right-wing protestors, and that is a problem we need to address.

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Thanks for invalidating my experience and those of black and brown people across the US. It is a systemic issue, their job is policing capital interests. History books and plenty of fields of study show this.

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

I didn't intend any offense, but validating individual personal experiences is not what policy is for. It's a statistical thing. Those fields of study are vastly more valuable than any anecdotes, which can be subject to a lot of different potential problems.

Particularly on the internet, which is absolutely full of people saying shit that is not actually true, and pretending to be things they are not.

It's not personal, it's very coldly impersonal. On purpose. I would discount an individual experience regardless of who the person was, or what they said.

[-] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 8 months ago

Nazi ideology is explicit violent and encourages murder of non-white people and others, there is no constitutional protection for literally threatening someone's life even if only through words.

If you menancingly say to someone "I'm going to kill you" you can be charged with a crime for that in the US. Supporting Naziism is little different than saying "I encourage the murder of Jews and other non-Aryans."

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

I like that line of reasoning. Would probably be tough to get the SC to rule that way though, in the current judicial climate.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

They need to be baited to say the quiet part out loud so everyone's aware

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Nazis marching are an explicit threat to all minorities and queer people. It should be treated as any other threat of violence is- as a violation of the law and disallowed.

[-] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 2 points 8 months ago

Childish take.

Tolerance will never extend to protect intolerance. Hate and violence will never be considered protected. It's not "for better or worse" douche, it's for WORSE because they are a violent hate group that wants to kill. Is this really so hard to comprehend?

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

lol No, it's not. However, the law is not subject to any kind of broader ethics. It's subject to laws written by people, whoever those people are and whatever they want, and the interpretations, which are again, done by people.

The law is not inherently "good", so the ethical interpretation of it is just one consideration. The law is blind.

If everyone voted for nazis, and those nazis made laws banning being jewish on pain of death, then that is what the law would do. This is why we need to rely on ourselves, as citizens, to fight this battle and not merely hope in the law.

[-] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 3 points 8 months ago

No, the law forbids hate speech at least in my country. As it should.

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Just remember the importance of fighting to keep that law in place. They can change laws, and even constitutions, if we let them.

this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
637 points (100.0% liked)

News

23274 readers
2929 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS