459
submitted 10 months ago by flyingsheep@lemmyhub.com to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world 90 points 10 months ago

Unfortunately the alternative is a literal wannabe-dictator. By not voting, you’re basically helping Trump.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I voted for Biden to stop fascism and now he's a genocide collaborator! Would Trump be worse? Maybe - it's unclear, because at least Democrats would oppose Trump. Trump saw the largest protest movement in American history, Trump inspires Democrats to actually ask for more, Trump will further isolate America (and Israel) geopolitically, it's hard to predict.

I'm not voting for him, I'm actually voting Democrat down ticket, but if he wins it's not the end of the world. It's an opportunity.

In the meantime? Withholding my vote is literally the only way I can exert pressure on Biden. I have a moral obligation to oppose genocide. I won't vote for it. If he's smart he'll reverse course on Israel to save his campaign and this will all be moot. Why is Biden helping Trump win?

[-] SheeEttin@programming.dev 40 points 10 months ago

You don't need to exert pressure on Biden. You need to help push the entire system back to the left. When Democrats in general are in government, it allows more room for further left candidates. Just like how electing Republicans made room for the Tea Party and the MAGA crazies. If the window had been more toward the left, they'd have been outside the Republican party.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 9 points 10 months ago

I'm voting Democrat down ticket. I'm just not voting for genocide Joe.

That's the only way I can exert any pressure on him, and I don't have to wait a year for that pressure to manifest. If enough Democrats had the courage to stand up to Biden he'd be forced to change his policies. Instead, you are all choosing to be complicit in genocide.

[-] SheeEttin@programming.dev 12 points 10 months ago

Not voting is a valid choice, one that says you're okay with either candidate winning. And that is being complicit with genocide. If you're not okay with that, vote.

If you don't want to wait a year, you can call, write, protest, and donate to groups to do those things on your behalf. But to throw away your vote is incredibly short-sighted.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago

I'm voting for Democrats down ticket, hardly throwing it away. I'm just not voting for any pro-genocide candidates.

And if Biden is smart, he'll see how much support he's losing and change his policy towards Israel.

[-] SheeEttin@programming.dev 6 points 10 months ago

Biden is an empty suit. If the party tells him to change, he'll change.

Alternatively, Trump wins and everything gets even shittier, and we lose even the possibility for things to get better.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I like how you found yourself being down voted the moment you acknowledged what a piss poor excuse for "Democracy" this is.

[-] SheeEttin@programming.dev 6 points 10 months ago

Yup. But in the choice of who to vote for president, there's the establishment candidate, or the "dictator for a day" candidate. Or there's not voting, which is saying "yes, either of those are okay". One of those things has the chance of making progress, and it should be obvious.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

What fucking progress my guy? Look around.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

And the Party would tell him to change if the Party knew they'd lose the presidency.

Do you think the Party would rather Trump win than stop supporting Israel? I doubt that.

[-] SheeEttin@programming.dev 5 points 10 months ago

They know they're not going to lose on this issue, though, because anyone who seriously evaluates the election has come to the same conclusion that I already said: a Trump victory is the worst outcome. Again, you'll have to put pressure on the party through other means, just one of which is electing more leftist downballot candidates.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They know they’re not going to lose on this issue, though, because anyone who seriously evaluates the election has come to the same conclusion that I already said: a Trump victory is the worst outcome.

Okay, so my vote is irrelevant, got it. I've asked elsewhere and I'll ask it here: why are you crawling up my dick about it? If my presidential vote doesn't matter because "they're not going to lose on this issue" then I can comfortably just leave that spot blank.

Again, you’ll have to put pressure on the party through other means, just one of which is electing more leftist downballot candidates.

Which I'm doing.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Exactly these people talk out of both sides of their mouths. On the one hand we don't matter, on the other we're responsible for HRC losing in 2016. It's so fucking pathetic.

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

They may actually lose on this issue. Democrats rely pretty heavily on younger voters and a lot of the really young voters, Zoomers, are making this a do or die issue, even though both of our only two parties with any chance of winning will support the genocide regardless.

[-] SUPERcrazy3530@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I don’t understand why people think the democrats losing to someone farther right would make them move left. Doesn’t it make more sense they’d move to the right since that’s what more voters wanted?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

The solution to our choices being a centrist and a literal fascist isn't to push the Overton window even further right. Such thinking is beyond naive.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

What centrist? All I see are two fascists, because genocide sure as fuck isn't centrist.

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

You don't have to be fascist to be genocidal. The two just tend to overlap.

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 16 points 10 months ago

>By not voting, you’re basically helping Trump.

only a vote for trump helps trump

[-] ExpertisePredicament 19 points 10 months ago

As a non American, seeing people claim that not voting doesn't help republicans is fucking hilarious. You'd think that after Trump winning in 2016 and stacking the supreme court, directly being the cause of abortion being outlawed in red states in the fucking 21st century (along with a host of other horrifying things), would make people actually fucking vote. But no here we are. Honestly I really hope you all get the government you want, but the longer I read politics posts on Lemmy the more I'm aghast at people who'd rather let it all burn down than aim for incremental positive change.

Apologies for any bad English, just putting my thoughts out there.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Man these libs suuuuure hate when you question their doctrine huh?

Here's a question for the one or two thinkers in this thread. I don't want replies, because replies will carry with them egos and snark for the peanut gallery. These questions are for you, (and no-comprendo's). Questions i had rolling around in my liberal brain before i transitioned to full troll or whatever liberals call leftists these days, questions that take time and reflection to answer.

  • If the Democrats only campaign to stop Republicans, but DON'T STOP the Republicans (only campaign to stop them), then when do we dem voters get to vote to help ourselves? Is there a timeline?

  • It has been 12 years of presidents, 12 long years of waiting, tightening our belts, "fighting for democracy". Why does it seem like the voters are the only ones interested in preserving it?

  • The DGA and the HRC campaign both have paper trails showing they've attempted to elevate extremism in the Republican party. Considering this is still a tactic in use, here's the million dollar question:

  • If the Democratic party could, would they keep running against a candidate like Trump every single election in the future?

Edit: thank you, those of you who are thinking. We need more people out there like you doing that

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

It has been 12 years of presidents, 12 long years of waiting, tightening our belts, "fighting for democracy". Why does it seem like the voters are the only ones interested in preserving it?

So you were happy with first term Obama but not second term Obama?

Am I reading this right?

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub 8 points 10 months ago

I wonder why republicans spend so much time trying to get people not to vote. Purging rolls, being against mail in voting, closing polling stations, etc. Seems dumb given that people not voting doesn’t help them.

Oh well. You probably know more about elections than them. Glad we have an expert in the house.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2024
459 points (100.0% liked)

News

23376 readers
1785 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS