1128
Parkable cities (startrek.website)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 43 points 9 months ago

They have transit to back that up though. There are plenty of smallish towns and rural areas that don't have any transit at all.

[-] Cheesus@lemmy.ca 16 points 9 months ago

I live in France, about 30 minutes from a major city. There is transit, but it's not good, and has very few stops near where I live. Grocery shopping has to be done by car or bike as there aren't any shops in the village. European cities are extremely well served by transit, but outside the metropolitan areas, cars are still king.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Impossible. This thread has shown me that literally all of Europe has year round Christmas markets with form of mechanical transportation. An entire continent reduce to pre-horse travel. Enough with facts feelings are all that is real.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

It's a really interesting thread. Cities are great, suburb & rural can be great and transit is great. 15 minute cities are great goals, but it's not a one size fits all situation. I can't figure out how they think these utopian 15 minute cities would work if they don't have a working transit built in. It's so weird, do they think handicapped people can bike and walk everywhere or don't exist? Do they think parents love sending their kids down the block to play by themselves instead of the backyard? Their choices aren't going to make sense for a ton of people. They're either right out of school or trolling, I can't tell which.

[-] ssorbom@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

It’s so weird, do they think handicapped people can bike and walk everywhere or don’t exist?

As a handicapped person myself, it really baffles me how people think car oriented infrastructure is so much better for us. I am a wheelchair user, and I live in a 15 minute neighborhood. Getting around in my wheelchair is a million times simpler there than in my old car-centric suburb, because the same disabilities that make me wheelchair bound also prevent me from driving. Which mean that in a car-centric environment I do one of the following:

a) Rely on the generosity of friends and family to cart me around at their convenience, or b) Utilize shared access rides, which are door to door, but take longer than using public transit, or c) Roll myself to underserved suburban bus stops over badly maintained sidewalk, and pray I make it on time.

None of which are appealing.

Meanwhile, in my 15 minute city:

  • The buses often run at 10 to 15 minute intervals (vs 30 to 60 minutes in the suburb),
  • Sidewalks are larger
  • I have less distance to travel in the first place
[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

And you're not blind and don't have a caretaker I assume.

[-] ssorbom@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Correct on both counts.

[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Handicapped people are more affected by the inverse. Small cities are great, car-centric communes are terrible for them. They've worked out their own mobility issues, but those solutions are interrupted when the crosswalks and pedestrian bridges are affected. If the "solution" involves getting in and out of a car repeatedly, it's often cumbersome for people in wheelchairs.

The point on kids really relates more to neighborhood safety, and how often people interact with a community. Often, kids should be trusted to go down the street to the park. All our old Saturday newspaper comics involve kids going places themselves on foot or bike instead of constantly "being dropped off".

[-] sbv@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago

I can't figure out how they think these utopian 15 minute cities would work if they don't have a working transit built in. It's so weird

Isn't the assumption that the 15 minute city is a neighbourhood in a functional city? There should be transit.

It's so weird, do they think handicapped people can bike and walk everywhere or don't exist?

I lived in something like a fifteen minute neighbourhood. I saw people in wheelchairs around. They appeared to use the same amenities as everyone else.

Do they think parents love sending their kids down the block to play by themselves instead of the backyard?

Our kids preferred going to playgrounds because the toys and play structures were better. And they ran into kids they knew.

Their choices aren't going to make sense for a ton of people.

I'm not sure what would be bad about a fifteen minute neighbourhood. It's just a normal neighbourhood, with stores, schools, work, and civic infrastructure.

As far as I can tell, a fifteen minute neighbourhood only adds to what exists, rather than taking away.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

There should be transit.

No, there are people in this thread saying that 15 minute cities are the transit. You'd think that would be the case.

As far as I can tell, a fifteen minute neighbourhood only adds to what exists, rather than taking away.

Look again at this thread, lol.

Neighborhoods that promote no cars would be great as long as they have the transit to back it up, imo as well.

Dig deeper and you'll see the crazy.

[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

You never even seen the Netherlands, have you? Also, what I tell everyone who comes up with these kind of non-questions, no one is taking your car away. Cars still exist in Europe, but they are not the default, they are used for what they make sense, making irregular trips of 100+Km. But chances are, that there is a train that serves the route anyway.

Handicapped people: most have access to electric micro-mobility vehicles that are legal to use on bike lanes. For those who can't use micro vehicles, there's still cars, and vans. They still exists. They weren't magicked away.

Kids: My sister lives in the outskirts of Madrid, her neighborhood is littered with dozens of parks of all kinds, all less than 10 minute walks. My 10 y.o. nephew can go on his own to many parks without ever having to set foot on asphalt, cross a road or get on neither a bus or a car. He has never had to play on a street. They live in an urban tower that, while they don't have a personal green cancer backyard, they have a skatepark, a playground, a pet park, sport courts (tennis, badminton, soccer and basketball), a running trail and a botanical garden, all within walking distance.

[-] Naja_Kaouthia@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

The first time I went to Amsterdam I was very surprised to see children just wandering about coming from or going to a nearby park. It’s not something you really see here in the US.

[-] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 3 points 9 months ago

Not anymore. It used to be the rule in the US. Even as recently as the 70s and 80s when I was a kid, we'd be gone from home all day everyday when not in school, just roaming around town and keeping ourselves entertained, usually on bikes or skateboards. We got up to a lot of mischief and hijinks, but nothing too serious, and we had a great time doing it.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

You might want to go through my comments again, lol. You seem very upset about me somewhat disagreeing with you.

Handicapped people: most have access to electric micro-mobility vehicles that are legal to use on bike lanes. For those who can’t use micro vehicles, there’s still cars, and vans. They still exists. They weren’t magicked away.

This comment really is funny when you look at it. First you're pretty patronizing that they have access to the bike lanes too! I know in Seattle, you'd be crazy to use the bike lanes if you were handicapped. And 15 minute cites usually have "walkable" in the tagline.

They live in an urban tower that, while they don’t have a personal green cancer backyard, they have a skatepark, a playground, a pet park, sport courts (tennis, badminton, soccer and basketball), a running trail and a botanical garden, all within walking distance.

Great, now compare that to a mini or studio apartment in Seattle. Better yet, compare that to an apartment on the South side of Chicago. As like anything else, if you're wealthy (not poor or middle class), everything is awesome.

I don't know why you're arguing with me, your black and white stance is confusing and tone deaf.

[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

My family is quite the opposite of wealthy. It has nothing to do with class. The fact that the US did cities wrong doesn't mean that somehow 15 min cities don't work. I read the whole thread and you seem to be either really confused or rather short of reading comprehension. You seem to have the impression that a bike lane is an asphalt gutter next to the cars where only athletic young men in full sport gear ride bicycles. But in Europe bike lanes are segregated wide, well conditioned spaces, where kids, people with mobility limitations, adults and elderly all share a slow speed lane safe and protected from cars.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

The fact that the US did cities wrong doesn’t mean that somehow 15 min cities don’t work.

I'm not saying they don't? Wow, there must be a language barrier or something. I'm saying yes they can and do work, but some people want something else.

[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

Yeah, and the people who want something else use the same arguments and rhetoric questions you have used all over this thread that are all fallacies meant to shutdown promotion of the concept because they feel personally threatened by the idea of stopping oil dependence.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

LMAO, no. I'm not trying to shut down anyone. I'm trying to say that you guys are naive to think that everyone wants to live in a walkable city. I think a good portion of young people do, which is great and they should be accommodated. You also need transit to support those walkable cities or do you think getting there if you don't live there, magically happens without cars. Please don't tell me you're an urban planner.

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 4 points 9 months ago

You are not trying to shut anything down, but spreading the arguments that are meaningless you don't exactly help the idea of walkable cities and distract from your own main point that different people need different things.

But if we return to your main point as you state it, it begs a question of how many people really want that different thing. I would say that this requires a research rather than a debate, but my guess is that the ones that want a house in the forest in the middle of nowhere are going to be a statistic outliers. The rest are going to likely be distributed normally between very dense and very sparse but most will likely fit into 15-minute city dense

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

but most will likely fit into 15-minute city dense

That's right, because nimby is a word for people who want 15 minute cities. /s

load more comments (54 replies)
this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
1128 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

5428 readers
2870 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS