221
submitted 11 months ago by ZeroCool@feddit.ch to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bedrooms@kbin.social 78 points 11 months ago

As a non-US citizen I'd like to reiterate that you can get rid of this idiocy only by banning guns.

Not interested in American opinion regrading this one, sorry, it's a super simple fact with no discussion worth wasting time for us.

[-] rosymind@leminal.space 22 points 11 months ago

I find it frustrating when people make a statement, and then say they aren't interested in hearing a specific group's opinion. It's rude af.

[-] Uncle_Bagel@midwest.social 10 points 11 months ago

Just because you have an opinion doesnt make it valid.

[-] capital@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago
[-] rosymind@leminal.space 4 points 11 months ago

True, but simply stating that doesn't change my opinion

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kata1yst@kbin.social 21 points 11 months ago

Statistically, most Americans agree with much stronger gun controls. Even a significant portion of the conservative block. It's the few holding the rest of us ransom.

[-] Forester@yiffit.net 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That would be because there are many people who have no idea about firearms trying to legislate firearms. When the laws are written and constructed in such a way that it makes it so that the commoner is a criminal then the law is not viable. Stop sticking ridiculous riders on your bills and legislation.

[-] capital@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

This is the only issue you’ll be downvoted for saying that about.

Abortion, internet security, immigration, healthcare, etc is all fine to say that about but not guns.

[-] Forester@yiffit.net 2 points 11 months ago

I have zero consideration for my karma score. If I bother commenting it's so others will read and possibly read into what I'm speaking of and further inform themselves.

[-] capital@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Oh I get it. I just hoped to add to it is all.

[-] Forester@yiffit.net 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/1808/text

Just for reference, the latest assault weapons ban would have banned everything that is not a bolt action rifle pump action shotgun lever action rifle or a revolver from the early 1900s. And with the overlapping restrictions many of those would also be banned for capacity weight or other arbitrary addon definitions.

For example a single action shotgun from 1880 would be classed as an illegal assault weapon as it has the capability to: "accept a detachable ammunition feeding device at some location outside of the pistol grip." It does not matter that it is a single action. Shotgun the fact that there are devices specifically invented to assist with reloading makes it an assault weapon as the law is written.

[-] iegod@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

I would rather live somewhere that bans guns by people who know nothing about guns than live somewhere where they aren't banned but still regulated by people who still know nothing.

[-] osarusan@kbin.social 19 points 11 months ago

Not interested in American opinion regrading this one

Kind of shitty to assume that all Americans have the same opinion, no?

[-] Obi@sopuli.xyz 9 points 11 months ago

Experience has taught me that unfortunately, while you don't all have the same opinion, most do reject the simple premise of the original comment, for various reasons, whether they're "left" or right.

[-] osarusan@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

Just so you've had the experience of meeting one, I am an American who is for banning guns.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Everyone from a country has a the same opinion. That newborn baby in Russia agrees with Putin on everything. There aren't +8 billion humans with their own pov, there are about 190 of us.

[-] bedrooms@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Well, there can of course be different opinions, but in reality every type of pro-gun argument is debunked (from my point of view) in r/gunsarecool. There's a megathread or sidebar that counter-argues every single opinion with proper citation, and also counter-argues every single counter-counter-argument. And then every counter-counter-counter-counter argument is also debunked there.

And to me thus the US pro-gun arguments look like just an exhibition of arguments I've seen and already countered better than I can.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Oh how magnanimous of you. Thank you for allowing more than one opinion to exist in a nation of 329,000,000 people. You sir are a king among men.

[-] osarusan@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

That didn't address what I said at all, so I'll just repeat it:

Kind of shitty to assume that all Americans have the same opinion, no?

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

You are not from a country, you are giving advice to that country, and you say you have no interest in what people from that country have to say.

I must admit in terms of ability to persuade people to your side this is a rather bold strategy. "Hi I have no stake in the outcome, strong feelings about the outcome, and I don't care what you the person who lives with the outcome thinks. Also you should do what I say".

[-] bedrooms@kbin.social 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I genuinely know you are correct. To be honest with you, I don't like what I wrote.

What's still interesting to me, this horrible human, is that I also gave up convincing Americans on guns and yet still can't stop posting. The endless debates on the internet about a topic that we outsiders tend to think has a simple single solution made me write that comment. I couldn't stop myself. Apologies.

[-] tastysnacks@programming.dev 4 points 11 months ago

He's not wrong. If we want to get rid of the idiocy. If we're willing to live with it, and based on our actions, we apparently are, then we don't need to ban guns.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] D_C@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago

I, from the UK, once had a 'conversation' about gun control with an American on Reddit. What brought this about was the day before a 9 year old girl was killed by a stray bullet from a drive-by. One moment she was in her bedroom doing some homework, and the next she was dead.

After a lot of back and forth with him getting more flummoxed and aggressive he then said something like "If she was outside playing like a normal kid then she wouldn't have been killed."
Yep, he blamed her.

That was the time I realised it was a waste of everything talking about it.

[-] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

people who argue that their right to guns is more important than a persons right to life is inherently moronic, and shouldn't be listened to.

[-] bedrooms@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

One thing I've learned is that, if you write a comment with reasonable
balance of views and still get attacks, the posters are people without proper trainings on critical debates.

In case of the gun ban, it's even worse because most people never lived in the rest of the world.

load more comments (60 replies)
[-] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

From a pro-gun stance, most of the discussions are useless anyway.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

b b but my sport makes me feel good!

and mountain climbing will only injure me

i want an exciting sport that will hurt others

[-] Oderus@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Americans are so backwards when it comes to valuing human life. There's no point in engaging them on anything at all, so it's best to block/ban people like Chitak the thundertard.

this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
221 points (100.0% liked)

News

23311 readers
3228 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS