29
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by dgerard@awful.systems to c/sneerclub@awful.systems

warning: seriously nasty narcissism at length

archive: https://archive.is/eoXQj

this is a response to the post discussed in: https://awful.systems/post/220620

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dgerard@awful.systems 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

look, you can't critique her narcissistic rant in any manner whatsoever until you've read it all line by line and the supporting non-evidence, or you're just intellectually dishonest

[-] Soyweiser@awful.systems 11 points 1 year ago

I'm sorry did you forget to evaluate the references included in the references included in the references? That is a bit dishonest, read the sequences twice and recite HPMOR once as penance, or increase your tithe by 1% by kissing the pinky ring.

[-] AcausalRobotGod@awful.systems 9 points 1 year ago

I saw some people say they'd spent ten hours reading this and trying to update their opinions. Tbf I might've spent nearly two hours making fun of them?

[-] Evinceo@awful.systems 8 points 1 year ago

Whenever I see that they're updating their opinions I imagine that's where the micro dosing comes in.

this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
29 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

1012 readers
1 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS