583
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Democrats know all they have to do is say the right things and people will keep voting.

Biden has no intention of doing anything meaningful on inflation.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 year ago
[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 7 points 1 year ago

He surely wouldn't but for those of who don't belong to either mainstream party your question is annoying AF. As long as we keep electing people from the same two pools of corporate backed idiots NOTHING is going to change.

[-] SeedyOne@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

None of us like it but most of us, eventually, learn what a trap third party voting is the way the system is set up. When you're young, naive and a bit idyllic it seems like an easy choice. "I'm standing up for change!" you think to yourself. Or perhaps the old "We gotta start somewhere, let's get that 5%!" nugget.

Then you get older and the shit you used watch from the sidelines on TV actually starts to affect your lives. Health care, education, retirement and other life issues show up and that naivety falls away rapidly as you learn that A) it'll take a revolution of sorts for any meaningful change and B) our lives are too short to hope for said revolution. Do we still want that change, absolutely. However, sometimes in life, you really do need to choose between the douche and the turd sandwich.

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 6 points 1 year ago

Then you get older...

Then you get even older and realize that choosing the douche or the turd sandwich ends up with you holding a douche or a turd sandwich.

At 52 I'm done with these games. Its too important to my children, my nation, and the actual environment I live in.

[-] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

I don't think these people will ever get it. It's the same mentality that keeps climate change raging on, "I can't change anything on my own, so I'll just keep doing the same thing until someone else fixes it."

[-] SeedyOne@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Fair to be fed up, but I feel that was more a concern when the two sides of the coin were very close to being the same. I'm not much behind you on age but I can still see that only one option TODAY is trying to blatantly and openly destroy most of the progress we made in your 52 years. I'd rather hold the douche and have a chance at getting out clean than hold the turd and assuredly end up covered in shit.

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago

...but I can still see that only one option TODAY is trying to blatantly and openly destroy most of the progress we made in your 52 years.

They both are, one is just more open about it and willing to get there a bit faster on some issues. Yes, the bulk of Conservatives are somewhere between "Awful" and "JFC this person needs to be beamed into outer space!" but the Authoritarianism and Stupidity are running just as rampant among the so-called Liberals.

I’d rather hold the douche and have a chance at getting out clean than hold the turd and assuredly end up covered in shit.

You know what a douche is for, right? That's the point of that skit, it's a Hobsons Choice. It"s amazing to me people continually bring that skit up without understanding what it really meant.

[-] SeedyOne@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Of course I know what one is for, the point I was making is that what SEEMS to be the same to you and what may have been is no longer the case.

You've clearly already checked out and, at best, listen to mainstream media if you're still in the "they are the same" or "one hides it better" camp. Lost cause.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

I tried to ask an honest question ... no snark intended.

And I happen to agree with electing the insane same old-same old expecting different results.

[-] JonEFive@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago

Someone once explained representative democracy this way: Choosing a candidate is like riding a bus. None of them are going to come directly to where you are and none of them are going to drop you off at your exact destination. The best you can do is choose the one that gets you as close as possible in the shortest amount of time. Sometimes you're not even gonna get that close and you'll still have a long walk to your destination, but at least you'll be closer than where you started. Sometimes you have to take one bus then transfer to another to get to your final destination.

When the alternatives are buses that are traveling the opposite direction, your best available choice becomes very clear.

The place where this analogy falls apart is that by not taking either bus, you may actually lose ground and get further away from your destination. So I guess when the alternative is a bus that stands less than a 5% chance of arriving, you ultimately end up being shoved onto the bus that the majority of people are riding.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

This person gets it.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

The 'their guy sucks too' defense doesn't inspire much confidence.

[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Better to at least support whichever candidate is less likely to destroy the country while we wait for a better one to come and save it.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

That would be the third party candidates.

[-] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

Ah, the "just wait til next time to vote for the person you want" argument that we see repeated every two years ad nauseam. That'll surely fix things.

[-] dumpsterlid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I agree with the spirit of what you are saying, but if you live in a swing state there is definitely an argument to be made about pragmatic damage control. I don't judge either way, if you don't feel like someone has earned your vote it isn't your fault that they haven't earned your vote.

I also agree that voting for the slightly less shitty candidate isn't going to fix anything in the longterm, but sometimes the best choice for the well being of people is damage control. Damage control isn't a strategy, but sometimes it is the best tactic within a broader strategy. That being said, fuck all that noise when people get upset at you for voting third party. You aren't the person that created a rigged system that doesn't provide meaningful choices for you to choose from. Someone can disagree with you on how best to fix that, but getting angry at you for choosing a different approach is just people taking out their anger on you for the system being rigged and broken.

this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
583 points (100.0% liked)

News

23627 readers
3407 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS