461
submitted 11 months ago by ironsoap@lemmy.one to c/news@lemmy.world

"For most markets where DoorDash operates, customers are prompted to tip on the checkout screen, with a middle option already selected by default. If they want to, they can adjust the tip later from the status screen while awaiting their food, or even after it’s delivered. That’s changing today; while blaming New York City’s minimum wage increase for delivery workers, DoorDash announced that for “select markets, including New York City,” tipping is now exclusively a post-checkout option"

It seems so ridiculous given tipping fatigue, that DoorDash is making what should be a given sound like a negative.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ArtificialLink@yall.theatl.social 235 points 11 months ago

This is the way it should be everywhere. I'm sorry but tipping before the order is even delivered creates a fucked up incentive with the drivers and the people getting food. Especially when apps like DoorDash make it very apparent. Who tipped well before they even pick up food. The tip should always be rendered after service.

[-] aberrate_junior_beatnik@lemmy.world 201 points 11 months ago

The tip should be rendered never, people should be paid a living wage.

[-] andrewta@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago

close but not quite. Tips are given for excellent service. It's an extra added bonus for going above and beyond. It should not (and as far as I'm concerned) is not used to pay a person's base wage.

[-] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 79 points 11 months ago

Minimum wage at restaurants in my state is $2.13 an hour. In such cases, it absolutely is used to pay someone's wages, which is fucked up, IMO.

[-] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 35 points 11 months ago

If a server' wage plus tip does not federal minimum wage, the business is required to make up the difference. I'm not saying the $7ish an hour federal minimum is a liveable wage.

What makes this extra stupid, is this means the first $5 or so each hour in tips only removes the obligation from the business owner and does nothing to help the server.

[-] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Yes, I agree the whole system is dumb and convoluted intentionally.

[-] Zibitee@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

minimum wage at restaurants in washington state is $16.28 starting next year. It's $15.74 right now. They still expect a 18% tip. Should I just say fuck it and not tip?

[-] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago
[-] Zibitee@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

my mindset is that if minimum wage is already a given, then I should be tipping a lot less than standard. Though doing so gets you shit treatment in future visits because tipping is more of a bribe than a remark on good service. Remarkable how all this works, isn't it?

[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 23 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's an extra added bonus for going above and beyond.

That's simply not the way it works and you know it. It's been enshrined as a tenet of economics at this point.

[-] RonnieB@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

You're just cheap.

[-] whofearsthenight@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

I'm fine with a tip for over and above service, but otherwise yes I agree.

Worth noting that this will absolutely destroy the gig economy (which I'm kinda also fine with, tbh) and things like food delivery we see today. There is a reason very few businesses delivered prior to the delivery apps.

[-] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 72 points 11 months ago

This has always annoyed me about food delivery services. Tips are supposed to be reflective of the service delivered. How can I know if that service is going to be good before a driver is even assigned to my order? Prompt after the delivery to add a tip.

Secondary note, if a company cannot pay their employees a living wage without tips than said company shouldn't exist. Nobody should have to rely on tips to...you know...exist.

[-] June@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago

So, I deliver for DoorDash from time to time, and it’s made me change how I view tipping in these apps.

I’m not tipping for quality of service (it’s hard to be ‘good’ vs ‘great’ on pick up, drive, drop off as a service, and if the driver manages to do that badly, DoorDash will make it right for you and ding the driver). Instead I’m tipping based on quantity of work, e.g., the distance I’m asking the driver to cover or the size/weight of the order if it’s something like groceries. While this is something that DoorDash should be doing, it’s not and is left to the customer to close the gap voluntarily.

DoorDash likes to act like they’re just connecting customers to people that want to make a delivery, but they’ve set up the system to feel like DoorDash is the service provider rather than the drivers. In reality, drivers should be setting their fees as independent contractors and DoorDash should only be providing the interface.

[-] bedrooms@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

Tips are definitely not the answer, but...

if a company cannot pay their employees a living wage without tips

Actually, where I live, we don't have a tip, but companies won't even if they can. The sad truth is that businesses won't without pressure. They just call it a social problem, weakness of their country, whatever.

It's a false assumption.

Again, I believe tips are not the answer.

[-] guyrocket@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

I agree. Pre tipping is not a good idea.

I also tip in cash whenever I can. Less chance of middlemen stealing it and "server" can decide to declare it as income or not.

this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
461 points (100.0% liked)

News

23387 readers
1994 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS