175
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TheJims@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Trump wants to Genocide Americans, Americans like you.

[-] thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Plot twist: that poster isn't American.

[-] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Most predictable plot twist of all plot twists ever.

[-] TylerDurdenJunior@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

It really is peak centrist liberal to be satisfied with the least horrible alternative.

Democracy is representative. If Noone represents you, why should you support them?

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

Imagine this scenario.

  • There's 100 people who will decide a winner.
  • 60 of them share the majority on the left and have varied beliefs (communism, socialism, liberalism, progressivism, etc.)
  • 40 share the minority on the right and have largely monolithic beliefs (religion, tradition, control, etc.)
  • Candidate C is a Centrist.
  • Candidate F is a Fascist.
  • There are 10 other candidates, Q-Z, with varying platforms across the political spectrum.

35 of the minority are guaranteed to vote for F. 1 votes for Q. 2 vote for R. 2 vote for S.

But that means the 60 have an easy 25 point lead. 3 vote for Q. 2 vote for R. 5 vote for T. 6 vote for X. 10 abstain on moral grounds and don't vote for anyone.

  • Candidate C gets 34 votes.
  • Candidate F gets 35 votes.
  • Candidate Q gets 1 vote.
  • Candidate R gets 4 votes.
  • Candidate S gets 2 votes.
  • Candidate T gets 5 votes.
  • Candidate X gets 6 votes.

Congratulations, the fascist won, because you thought you had the privilege to vote for your favorite, or maybe you didn't vote at all. Either way, the fascist took your human rights away, along with everybody else's. But you go to sleep at night knowing you stood your ground like a good idealogue.

[-] TylerDurdenJunior@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Imagine this scenario.

You have a representative democratic system that degrades itself completely decade after decade while the culprits stuff their pockets and make careers out no longer representing the people that voted for them.

After so many decades of automating and accommodating financial interests, to the point where lobbies and corporate interests basically write the laws the politicians sign, the system is now completely broken and is no longer, in any way shape or form something that represents the interests of the people.

It is not privilege, but necessity to abstain from voting for actors in that system, unless they want to change it.

And I haven't even covered how the system you are voting for are using war, death and terror to further, spread the domination of the same financial interests, and even destabilize and meddle in other democratic processes all over the world.

If there was a candidate that atleast pretended to want real change, I would absolutely encourage everyone to vote. But there isn't. Not even the slightest.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It is not privilege, but necessity to abstain from voting for actors in that system, unless they want to change it.

You are advocating for being the 10 who abstain. The scenario I presented is how it works now (minus the political chess that is the Electoral College). What does abstention do to prevent the rise of fascism? How would you convince the other 90 to join you en masse? How would you prevent just one person from keeping such a system alive?

I know you can't answer these questions, because none of the people who think like you can. This system sucks. I'm with you on that. But there isn't another option, therefore choosing not to participate doesn't do anything but give a leg up to the fascists.

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
175 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19356 readers
1458 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS